G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER

2024

Why buy it

✅Costs $200 less on MSRP ($799 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
✅Delivers 27.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 39.8 vs 31.3 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023).
✅Draws 285W instead of 355W, a 70W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 16 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

Radeon RX 7900 XTX

2022

Why buy it

✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 16 GB).

Trade-offs

❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
❌
25% HIGHER MSRP
$999 MSRPvs$799 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 31.3 vs 39.8 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
❌24.6% higher power demand at 355W vs 285W.

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER

2024

Radeon RX 7900 XTX

2022

Why buy it

✅Costs $200 less on MSRP ($799 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
✅Delivers 27.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 39.8 vs 31.3 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023).
✅Draws 285W instead of 355W, a 70W reduction.

Why buy it

✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 16 GB).

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 16 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

Trade-offs

❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
❌
25% HIGHER MSRP
$999 MSRPvs$799 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 31.3 vs 39.8 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
❌24.6% higher power demand at 355W vs 285W.

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER better than Radeon RX 7900 XTX?

Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 31,828 vs 31,285 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is the overall package: you are getting a newer generation, DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, plus much lower power draw (285W vs 355W).

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2024 generation instead of 2022 and the stronger feature stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation instead of FSR 3 + AFMF. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER can still make sense if you find it at the right price, especially around $799 MSRP. GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is still the smarter buy for most people, though, because the raw performance is close while the overall package is cleaner. GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is about $200 cheaper on MSRP at $799 MSRP versus $999 MSRP, and you are getting 1.7% higher G3D Mark. Moving to $799 MSRP gets you newer hardware, lower power draw (285W vs 355W), and DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation.

Is Radeon RX 7900 XTX still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. Radeon RX 7900 XTX is still a strong gaming card in 2026: it is excellent for 1080p and 1440p maxed-out gaming, and still very capable for 4K in many titles. Price is really the swing factor here. If you find it at or below $999 MSRP, it remains a very sensible buy. GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is still the safer recommendation for most fresh builds because it offers a cleaner overall package with newer hardware and DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER Benchmark Check

Radeon RX 7900 XTX Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER	Radeon RX 7900 XTX
1080p
low	282 FPS	325 FPS
medium	271 FPS	310 FPS
high	234 FPS	265 FPS
ultra	193 FPS	209 FPS
1440p
low	252 FPS	307 FPS
medium	214 FPS	258 FPS
high	175 FPS	208 FPS
ultra	148 FPS	168 FPS
4K
low	147 FPS	188 FPS
medium	123 FPS	156 FPS
high	99 FPS	119 FPS
ultra	92 FPS	106 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER Open Radeon RX 7900 XTX

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER	Radeon RX 7900 XTX
1080p
low	719 FPS	881 FPS
medium	580 FPS	690 FPS
high	435 FPS	534 FPS
ultra	383 FPS	472 FPS
1440p
low	529 FPS	678 FPS
medium	430 FPS	545 FPS
high	339 FPS	432 FPS
ultra	277 FPS	362 FPS
4K
low	255 FPS	375 FPS
medium	214 FPS	308 FPS
high	193 FPS	276 FPS
ultra	163 FPS	237 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER Open Radeon RX 7900 XTX

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER	Radeon RX 7900 XTX
1080p
low	999 FPS	999 FPS
medium	999 FPS	999 FPS
high	955 FPS	939 FPS
ultra	716 FPS	704 FPS
1440p
low	976 FPS	964 FPS
medium	859 FPS	845 FPS
high	716 FPS	704 FPS
ultra	537 FPS	528 FPS
4K
low	573 FPS	580 FPS
medium	489 FPS	504 FPS
high	430 FPS	438 FPS
ultra	358 FPS	352 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER Open Radeon RX 7900 XTX

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER	Radeon RX 7900 XTX
1080p
low	962 FPS	999 FPS
medium	817 FPS	884 FPS
high	726 FPS	779 FPS
ultra	651 FPS	672 FPS
1440p
low	753 FPS	772 FPS
medium	630 FPS	655 FPS
high	548 FPS	563 FPS
ultra	483 FPS	483 FPS
4K
low	509 FPS	547 FPS
medium	438 FPS	475 FPS
high	389 FPS	415 FPS
ultra	341 FPS	352 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER Open Radeon RX 7900 XTX

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER and Radeon RX 7900 XTX

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER

The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 8 2024. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2340 MHz to 2610 MHz. It has 8448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 285W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 66 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 31,828 points. Launch price was $799.

Radeon RX 7900 XTX

The Radeon RX 7900 XTX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 3 2022. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1929 MHz to 2498 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 355W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 96 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 31,285 points. Launch price was $999.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER scores 31,828 and the Radeon RX 7900 XTX reaches 31,285 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon RX 7900 XTX uses RDNA 3.0, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 8,448 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER) vs 6,144 (Radeon RX 7900 XTX). Raw compute: 44.1 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER) vs 61.39 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7900 XTX). Boost clocks: 2610 MHz vs 2498 MHz. Ray tracing: 66 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER) vs 96 (Radeon RX 7900 XTX) with 264 Tensor cores.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER	Radeon RX 7900 XTX
G3D Mark Score	31,828+2%	31,285
Architecture	Ada Lovelace	RDNA 3.0
Process Node	5 nm	5 nm
Shading Units	8448+38%	6144
Compute (TFLOPS)	44.1 TFLOPS	61.39 TFLOPS+39%
Boost Clock	2610 MHz+4%	2498 MHz
ROPs	96	192+100%
TMUs	264	384+45%
L1 Cache	8.3 MB+177%	3 MB
L2 Cache	48 MB+700%	6 MB
Ray Tracing Cores	66	96+45%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Both GPUs support Frame Generation technologies, but they achieve it differently. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER uses DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, while the Radeon RX 7900 XTX relies on FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. Both can significantly boost FPS in supported titles, but they are not on the same feature stack.The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 7900 XTX relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER	Radeon RX 7900 XTX
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution	FSR 3
Frame Generation	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation	FSR Frame Generation + AFMF
Ray Reconstruction	Yes (DLSS 3.5)	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER comes with 16 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 7900 XTX has 24 GB. The Radeon RX 7900 XTX offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 672 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER) vs 960 GB/s (Radeon RX 7900 XTX) — a 42.9% advantage for the Radeon RX 7900 XTX. Bus width: 256-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 48 MB (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER) vs 6 MB (Radeon RX 7900 XTX) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER	Radeon RX 7900 XTX
VRAM Capacity	16 GB	24 GB+50%
Memory Type	GDDR6X	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	672 GB/s	960 GB/s+43%
Bus Width	256-bit	384-bit+50%
L2 Cache	48 MB+700%	6 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER) vs 12 Ultimate (Radeon RX 7900 XTX). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER	Radeon RX 7900 XTX
DirectX	12 Ultimate	12 Ultimate
Vulkan	1.3	1.4+8%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 8th gen (Dual) (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER) vs AMD Dual Media Engine (Radeon RX 7900 XTX). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs AMD Dual Media Engine. Supported codecs: AV1,H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (Radeon RX 7900 XTX).

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER	Radeon RX 7900 XTX
Encoder	NVENC 8th gen (Dual)	AMD Dual Media Engine
Decoder	NVDEC 5th gen	AMD Dual Media Engine
Codecs	AV1,H.264,H.265/HEVC	H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER draws 285W versus the Radeon RX 7900 XTX's 355W — a 21.9% difference. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 750W (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER) vs 800W (Radeon RX 7900 XTX). Power connectors: 16-pin (12VHPWR) vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 310mm vs 287mm, occupying 3 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 72°C vs 68°C.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER	Radeon RX 7900 XTX
TDP	285W-20%	355W
Recommended PSU	750W-6%	800W
Power Connector	16-pin (12VHPWR)	2x 8-pin
Length	310mm	287mm
Height	111mm	110mm
Slots	3	2-33%
Temp (Load)	72°C	68°C-6%
Perf/Watt	111.7+27%	88.1

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER launched at $799 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 7900 XTX launched at $999. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER costs 20% less ($200 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 39.8 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER) vs 31.3 (Radeon RX 7900 XTX) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER offers 27.2% better value. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2022).