
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
Popular choices:

RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
2024Why buy it
- ✅19.0% more average FPS across 38 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $1,200 less on MSRP ($799 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 165.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 39.8 vs 15.0 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 16 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (264 vs 280), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌307.1% higher power demand at 285W vs 70W.
- ❌85.6% longer card at 310mm vs 167mm.
RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition
2025Why buy it
- ✅6.1% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (280 vs 264).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 16 GB).
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 285W, a 215W reduction.
- ✅Measures 167mm instead of 310mm, a 143mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER across 38 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌150.2% HIGHER MSRP$1,999 MSRPvs$799 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 15.0 vs 39.8 G3D/$ ($1,999 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
2024RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition
2025Why buy it
- ✅19.0% more average FPS across 38 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $1,200 less on MSRP ($799 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 165.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 39.8 vs 15.0 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
Why buy it
- ✅6.1% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (280 vs 264).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 16 GB).
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 285W, a 215W reduction.
- ✅Measures 167mm instead of 310mm, a 143mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 16 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (264 vs 280), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌307.1% higher power demand at 285W vs 70W.
- ❌85.6% longer card at 310mm vs 167mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER across 38 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌150.2% HIGHER MSRP$1,999 MSRPvs$799 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 15.0 vs 39.8 G3D/$ ($1,999 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER better than RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition make more sense than GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 282 FPS | 171 FPS |
| medium | 271 FPS | 153 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 127 FPS |
| ultra | 193 FPS | 93 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 252 FPS | 151 FPS |
| medium | 214 FPS | 129 FPS |
| high | 175 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 148 FPS | 66 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 147 FPS | 75 FPS |
| medium | 123 FPS | 64 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 40 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 719 FPS | 288 FPS |
| medium | 580 FPS | 231 FPS |
| high | 435 FPS | 183 FPS |
| ultra | 383 FPS | 155 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 529 FPS | 223 FPS |
| medium | 430 FPS | 171 FPS |
| high | 339 FPS | 140 FPS |
| ultra | 277 FPS | 114 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 255 FPS | 125 FPS |
| medium | 214 FPS | 100 FPS |
| high | 193 FPS | 87 FPS |
| ultra | 163 FPS | 70 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 999 FPS | 777 FPS |
| medium | 999 FPS | 644 FPS |
| high | 955 FPS | 549 FPS |
| ultra | 716 FPS | 481 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 976 FPS | 571 FPS |
| medium | 859 FPS | 475 FPS |
| high | 716 FPS | 401 FPS |
| ultra | 537 FPS | 341 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 573 FPS | 407 FPS |
| medium | 489 FPS | 336 FPS |
| high | 430 FPS | 274 FPS |
| ultra | 358 FPS | 217 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 962 FPS | 292 FPS |
| medium | 817 FPS | 252 FPS |
| high | 726 FPS | 209 FPS |
| ultra | 651 FPS | 184 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 753 FPS | 230 FPS |
| medium | 630 FPS | 201 FPS |
| high | 548 FPS | 169 FPS |
| ultra | 483 FPS | 145 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 509 FPS | 141 FPS |
| medium | 438 FPS | 119 FPS |
| high | 389 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 341 FPS | 80 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER and RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 8 2024. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2340 MHz to 2610 MHz. It has 8448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 285W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 66 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 31,828 points. Launch price was $799.

RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition
RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition
The RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 11 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 577 MHz to 1432 MHz. It has 8960 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 70 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 30,020 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER scores 31,828 versus the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition's 30,020 — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER leads by 6%. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is built on Ada Lovelace while the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition uses Blackwell 2.0, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 8,448 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER) vs 8,960 (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition). Raw compute: 44.1 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER) vs 25.66 TFLOPS (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition). Boost clocks: 2610 MHz vs 1432 MHz. Ray tracing: 66 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER) vs 70 (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition) with 264 Tensor cores vs 280.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 31,828+6% | 30,020 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Blackwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 8448 | 8960+6% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 44.1 TFLOPS+72% | 25.66 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2610 MHz+82% | 1432 MHz |
| ROPs | 96 | 96 |
| TMUs | 264 | 280+6% |
| L1 Cache | 8.3 MB | 8.8 MB+6% |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB | 48 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 66 | 70+6% |
| Tensor Cores | 264 | 280+6% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is capped at DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER comes with 16 GB of VRAM, while the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition has 24 GB. The RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 16 GB | 24 GB+50% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB | 48 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER) vs 12 Ultimate (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 8th gen (Dual) (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER) vs NVENC 9th Gen (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs NVDEC 6th Gen. Supported codecs: AV1,H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER) vs H.264,H.265,AV1 (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 8th gen (Dual) | NVENC 9th Gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | NVDEC 6th Gen |
| Codecs | AV1,H.264,H.265/HEVC | H.264,H.265,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER draws 285W versus the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition's 70W — a 121.1% difference. The RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 750W (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER) vs 650W (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition). Power connectors: 16-pin (12VHPWR) vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 310mm vs 167mm, occupying 3 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 72°C vs 72°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 285W | 70W-75% |
| Recommended PSU | 750W | 650W-13% |
| Power Connector | 16-pin (12VHPWR) | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 310mm | 167mm |
| Height | 111mm | 69mm |
| Slots | 3 | 2-33% |
| Temp (Load) | 72°C | 72°C |
| Perf/Watt | 111.7 | 428.9+284% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER launched at $799 MSRP, while the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition launched at $1999. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER costs 60% less ($1200 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 39.8 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER) vs 15.0 (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER offers 165.3% better value. The RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2024).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $799-60% | $1999 |
| Performance per Dollar | 39.8+165% | 15.0 |
| Codename | AD103 | GB203 |
| Release | January 8 2024 | August 11 2025 |
| Ranking | #10 | #17 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












