
RTX A4500
Popular choices:

RTX A5500
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
RTX A4500
2021Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,901 less on MSRP ($1,699 MSRP vs $3,600 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 111.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 12.4 vs 5.9 G3D/$ ($1,699 MSRP vs $3,600 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 200W instead of 230W, a 30W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX A5500 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (224 vs 320), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
RTX A5500
2022Why buy it
- ✅54.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅42.9% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (320 vs 224).
- ✅1100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 2 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌111.9% HIGHER MSRP$3,600 MSRPvs$1,699 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.9 vs 12.4 G3D/$ ($3,600 MSRP vs $1,699 MSRP).
- ❌15% higher power demand at 230W vs 200W.
RTX A4500
2021RTX A5500
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,901 less on MSRP ($1,699 MSRP vs $3,600 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 111.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 12.4 vs 5.9 G3D/$ ($1,699 MSRP vs $3,600 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 200W instead of 230W, a 30W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅54.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅42.9% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (320 vs 224).
- ✅1100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 2 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX A5500 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (224 vs 320), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
Trade-offs
- ❌111.9% HIGHER MSRP$3,600 MSRPvs$1,699 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.9 vs 12.4 G3D/$ ($3,600 MSRP vs $1,699 MSRP).
- ❌15% higher power demand at 230W vs 200W.
Quick Answers
So, is RTX A5500 better than RTX A4500?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does RTX A4500 make more sense than RTX A5500?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | RTX A4500 | RTX A5500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 104 FPS | 213 FPS |
| medium | 88 FPS | 188 FPS |
| high | 73 FPS | 157 FPS |
| ultra | 51 FPS | 110 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 82 FPS | 193 FPS |
| medium | 68 FPS | 162 FPS |
| high | 51 FPS | 117 FPS |
| ultra | 35 FPS | 81 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 34 FPS | 98 FPS |
| medium | 31 FPS | 83 FPS |
| high | 23 FPS | 56 FPS |
| ultra | 20 FPS | 48 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | RTX A4500 | RTX A5500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 441 FPS | 524 FPS |
| medium | 377 FPS | 458 FPS |
| high | 299 FPS | 358 FPS |
| ultra | 260 FPS | 314 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 332 FPS | 409 FPS |
| medium | 276 FPS | 349 FPS |
| high | 221 FPS | 270 FPS |
| ultra | 184 FPS | 226 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 166 FPS | 213 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 181 FPS |
| high | 120 FPS | 150 FPS |
| ultra | 96 FPS | 124 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | RTX A4500 | RTX A5500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 564 FPS | 894 FPS |
| medium | 477 FPS | 726 FPS |
| high | 407 FPS | 631 FPS |
| ultra | 339 FPS | 475 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 700 FPS |
| medium | 372 FPS | 564 FPS |
| high | 323 FPS | 475 FPS |
| ultra | 260 FPS | 356 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 287 FPS | 475 FPS |
| medium | 237 FPS | 380 FPS |
| high | 190 FPS | 317 FPS |
| ultra | 149 FPS | 237 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | RTX A4500 | RTX A5500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 174 FPS | 354 FPS |
| medium | 144 FPS | 316 FPS |
| high | 125 FPS | 278 FPS |
| ultra | 109 FPS | 238 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 128 FPS | 270 FPS |
| medium | 109 FPS | 247 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 213 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 179 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 75 FPS | 176 FPS |
| medium | 63 FPS | 154 FPS |
| high | 49 FPS | 118 FPS |
| ultra | 39 FPS | 95 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RTX A4500 and RTX A5500

RTX A4500
RTX A4500
The RTX A4500 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 23 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1050 MHz to 1650 MHz. It has 7168 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 56 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 21,094 points.

RTX A5500
RTX A5500
The RTX A5500 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1080 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 10240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 80 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 21,108 points.
Graphics Performance
The RTX A4500 scores 21,094 and the RTX A5500 reaches 21,108 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RTX A4500 is built on Ampere while the RTX A5500 uses Ampere, both on a 8 nm process. Shader units: 7,168 (RTX A4500) vs 10,240 (RTX A5500). Raw compute: 23.65 TFLOPS (RTX A4500) vs 34.1 TFLOPS (RTX A5500). Boost clocks: 1650 MHz vs 1665 MHz. Ray tracing: 56 RT cores (RTX A4500) vs 80 (RTX A5500) with 224 Tensor cores vs 320.
| Feature | RTX A4500 | RTX A5500 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 21,094 | 21,108 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Ampere |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 7168 | 10240+43% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 23.65 TFLOPS | 34.1 TFLOPS+44% |
| Boost Clock | 1650 MHz | 1665 MHz |
| ROPs | 96 | 96 |
| TMUs | 224 | 320+43% |
| L1 Cache | 7 MB | 10 MB+43% |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB | 6 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 56 | 80+43% |
| Tensor Cores | 224 | 320+43% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RTX A4500 | RTX A5500 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RTX A4500 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the RTX A5500 has 24 GB. The RTX A5500 offers 1100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 448 GB/s (RTX A4500) vs 768 GB/s (RTX A5500) — a 71.4% advantage for the RTX A5500. Bus width: 192-bit vs 384-bit.
| Feature | RTX A4500 | RTX A5500 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 24 GB+1100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 768 GB/s+71% |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 384-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB | 6 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (RTX A4500) vs 12.1 (RTX A5500). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | RTX A4500 | RTX A5500 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 7th Gen NVENC (2x) (RTX A4500) vs 7th Gen NVENC (2x) (RTX A5500). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A4500) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A5500).
| Feature | RTX A4500 | RTX A5500 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 7th Gen NVENC (2x) | 7th Gen NVENC (2x) |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The RTX A4500 draws 200W versus the RTX A5500's 230W — a 14% difference. The RTX A4500 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (RTX A4500) vs 450W (RTX A5500). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | RTX A4500 | RTX A5500 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W-13% | 230W |
| Recommended PSU | 450W | 450W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 105.5+15% | 91.8 |
Value Analysis
The RTX A4500 launched at $1699 MSRP, while the RTX A5500 launched at $3600. The RTX A4500 costs 52.8% less ($1901 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 12.4 (RTX A4500) vs 5.9 (RTX A5500) — the RTX A4500 offers 110.2% better value. The RTX A5500 is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2021).
| Feature | RTX A4500 | RTX A5500 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1699-53% | $3600 |
| Performance per Dollar | 12.4+110% | 5.9 |
| Codename | GA102 | GA102 |
| Release | November 23 2021 | March 22 2022 |
| Ranking | #68 | #67 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












