G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Radeon RX 6750 XT

2022

Why buy it

✅18.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $1,150 less on MSRP ($549 MSRP vs $1,699 MSRP).
✅Delivers 203.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 37.7 vs 12.4 G3D/$ ($549 MSRP vs $1,699 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
✅500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 2 GB).

Trade-offs

❌25% higher power demand at 250W vs 200W.

RTX A4500

2021

Why buy it

✅Draws 200W instead of 250W, a 50W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 6750 XT across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon RX 6750 XT is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌
209.5% HIGHER MSRP
$1,699 MSRPvs$549 MSRP

Radeon RX 6750 XT

2022

RTX A4500

2021

Why buy it

✅18.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $1,150 less on MSRP ($549 MSRP vs $1,699 MSRP).
✅Delivers 203.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 37.7 vs 12.4 G3D/$ ($549 MSRP vs $1,699 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
✅500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 2 GB).

Why buy it

✅Draws 200W instead of 250W, a 50W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌25% higher power demand at 250W vs 200W.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 6750 XT across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon RX 6750 XT is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌
209.5% HIGHER MSRP
$1,699 MSRPvs$549 MSRP

Quick Answers

So, is Radeon RX 6750 XT better than RTX A4500?

Yes. Radeon RX 6750 XT is the better GPU overall here. You are getting 18.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data, 2% higher PassMark G3D performance, and 12 GB vs 2 GB of VRAM. It also comes from 2022 instead of 2021, which helps its case as the more complete modern gaming card.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon RX 6750 XT is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2022 generation instead of 2021, more VRAM at 12 GB instead of 2 GB, better upscaling support with FSR 3 (2023) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack and better frame-generation support with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, and a 7nm process instead of 8nm. That extra memory headroom makes it the safer pick for newer games, heavier textures, and higher settings over time.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

Radeon RX 6750 XT is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. Radeon RX 6750 XT is about $1,150 cheaper on MSRP at $549 MSRP versus $1,699 MSRP, and you are getting 18.5% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and a lower G3D Mark (20,686 vs 21,094). It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 203.5%. That is why the better overall card still comes out as the smarter buy today, not just the faster one.

Is RTX A4500 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. RTX A4500 is still a strong modern gaming GPU: it is excellent for 1080p, very strong for 1440p, and still capable at 4K with sensible settings or upscaling. It remains a good buy when you can get it meaningfully cheaper than the alternative around $1,699 MSRP, even if Radeon RX 6750 XT is still the cleaner recommendation on overall value today.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Radeon RX 6750 XT Benchmark Check

RTX A4500 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Radeon RX 6750 XT	RTX A4500
1080p
low	175 FPS	104 FPS
medium	155 FPS	88 FPS
high	142 FPS	73 FPS
ultra	120 FPS	51 FPS
1440p
low	145 FPS	82 FPS
medium	117 FPS	68 FPS
high	108 FPS	51 FPS
ultra	97 FPS	35 FPS
4K
low	87 FPS	34 FPS
medium	73 FPS	31 FPS
high	60 FPS	23 FPS
ultra	52 FPS	20 FPS

Open Radeon RX 6750 XT Open RTX A4500

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Radeon RX 6750 XT	RTX A4500
1080p
low	475 FPS	441 FPS
medium	404 FPS	377 FPS
high	326 FPS	299 FPS
ultra	274 FPS	260 FPS
1440p
low	298 FPS	332 FPS
medium	247 FPS	276 FPS
high	207 FPS	221 FPS
ultra	174 FPS	184 FPS
4K
low	131 FPS	166 FPS
medium	112 FPS	140 FPS
high	92 FPS	120 FPS
ultra	70 FPS	96 FPS

Open Radeon RX 6750 XT Open RTX A4500

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Radeon RX 6750 XT	RTX A4500
1080p
low	867 FPS	564 FPS
medium	705 FPS	477 FPS
high	621 FPS	407 FPS
ultra	465 FPS	339 FPS
1440p
low	663 FPS	442 FPS
medium	532 FPS	372 FPS
high	459 FPS	323 FPS
ultra	349 FPS	260 FPS
4K
low	454 FPS	287 FPS
medium	363 FPS	237 FPS
high	310 FPS	190 FPS
ultra	233 FPS	149 FPS

Open Radeon RX 6750 XT Open RTX A4500

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Radeon RX 6750 XT	RTX A4500
1080p
low	706 FPS	174 FPS
medium	587 FPS	144 FPS
high	493 FPS	125 FPS
ultra	414 FPS	109 FPS
1440p
low	542 FPS	128 FPS
medium	453 FPS	109 FPS
high	368 FPS	96 FPS
ultra	310 FPS	83 FPS
4K
low	323 FPS	75 FPS
medium	286 FPS	63 FPS
high	258 FPS	49 FPS
ultra	211 FPS	39 FPS

Open Radeon RX 6750 XT Open RTX A4500

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 6750 XT and RTX A4500

Radeon RX 6750 XT

The Radeon RX 6750 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 3 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2150 MHz to 2600 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,686 points. Launch price was $549.

RTX A4500

The RTX A4500 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 23 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1050 MHz to 1650 MHz. It has 7168 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 56 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 21,094 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon RX 6750 XT scores 20,686 and the RTX A4500 reaches 21,094 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 6750 XT is built on RDNA 2.0 while the RTX A4500 uses Ampere, both on 7 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (Radeon RX 6750 XT) vs 7,168 (RTX A4500). Raw compute: 13.31 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6750 XT) vs 23.65 TFLOPS (RTX A4500). Boost clocks: 2600 MHz vs 1650 MHz. Ray tracing: 40 RT cores (Radeon RX 6750 XT) vs 56 (RTX A4500) vs 224.

Feature	Radeon RX 6750 XT	RTX A4500
G3D Mark Score	20,686	21,094+2%
Architecture	RDNA 2.0	Ampere
Process Node	7 nm	8 nm
Shading Units	2560	7168+180%
Compute (TFLOPS)	13.31 TFLOPS	23.65 TFLOPS+78%
Boost Clock	2600 MHz+58%	1650 MHz
ROPs	64	96+50%
TMUs	160	224+40%
L1 Cache	0.5 MB	7 MB+1300%
L2 Cache	3 MB	6 MB+100%
Ray Tracing Cores	40	56+40%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 6750 XT is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The RTX A4500 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The RTX A4500 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 6750 XT relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	Radeon RX 6750 XT	RTX A4500
Upscaling Tech	FSR 3	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	FSR Frame Generation + AFMF	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon RX 6750 XT comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the RTX A4500 has 2 GB. The Radeon RX 6750 XT offers 500% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 432 GB/s (Radeon RX 6750 XT) vs 448 GB/s (RTX A4500) — a 3.7% advantage for the RTX A4500. Bus width: 192-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (Radeon RX 6750 XT) vs 6 MB (RTX A4500) — the RTX A4500 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon RX 6750 XT	RTX A4500
VRAM Capacity	12 GB+500%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	432 GB/s	448 GB/s+4%
Bus Width	192-bit	192-bit
L2 Cache	3 MB	6 MB+100%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Radeon RX 6750 XT) vs 12.1 (RTX A4500). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	Radeon RX 6750 XT	RTX A4500
DirectX	12 Ultimate	12.1
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCN 3.0 (Radeon RX 6750 XT) vs 7th Gen NVENC (2x) (RTX A4500). Decoder: VCN 3.0 vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only),VP9 (Radeon RX 6750 XT) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A4500).

Feature	Radeon RX 6750 XT	RTX A4500
Encoder	VCN 3.0	7th Gen NVENC (2x)
Decoder	VCN 3.0	5th Gen NVDEC
Codecs	H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only),VP9	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode)

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon RX 6750 XT draws 250W versus the RTX A4500's 200W — a 22.2% difference. The RTX A4500 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Radeon RX 6750 XT) vs 450W (RTX A4500). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.

Feature	Radeon RX 6750 XT	RTX A4500
TDP	250W	200W-20%
Recommended PSU	650W	450W-31%
Power Connector	6-pin + 8-pin	8-pin
Length	267mm	267mm
Height	—	111mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	80°C	80°C
Perf/Watt	82.7	105.5+28%

💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon RX 6750 XT launched at $549 MSRP, while the RTX A4500 launched at $1699. The Radeon RX 6750 XT costs 67.7% less ($1150 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 37.7 (Radeon RX 6750 XT) vs 12.4 (RTX A4500) — the Radeon RX 6750 XT offers 204% better value. The Radeon RX 6750 XT is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2021).