
GeForce RTX 4060
Popular choices:

RTX A5500
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4060
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $3,301 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $3,600 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1015% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 5.9 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $3,600 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 115W instead of 230W, a 115W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX A5500 across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (96 vs 320), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
RTX A5500
2022Why buy it
- ✅41.3% more average FPS across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅233.3% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (320 vs 96).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌1104% HIGHER MSRP$3,600 MSRPvs$299 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.9 vs 65.4 G3D/$ ($3,600 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ❌100% higher power demand at 230W vs 115W.
GeForce RTX 4060
2023RTX A5500
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $3,301 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $3,600 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1015% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 5.9 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $3,600 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 115W instead of 230W, a 115W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅41.3% more average FPS across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅233.3% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (320 vs 96).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX A5500 across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (96 vs 320), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌1104% HIGHER MSRP$3,600 MSRPvs$299 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.9 vs 65.4 G3D/$ ($3,600 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ❌100% higher power demand at 230W vs 115W.
Quick Answers
So, is RTX A5500 better than GeForce RTX 4060?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce RTX 4060 make more sense than RTX A5500?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | RTX A5500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 167 FPS | 213 FPS |
| medium | 152 FPS | 188 FPS |
| high | 134 FPS | 157 FPS |
| ultra | 115 FPS | 110 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 137 FPS | 193 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 162 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 117 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 81 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 86 FPS | 98 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 83 FPS |
| high | 62 FPS | 56 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 48 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | RTX A5500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 392 FPS | 524 FPS |
| medium | 334 FPS | 458 FPS |
| high | 268 FPS | 358 FPS |
| ultra | 211 FPS | 314 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 240 FPS | 409 FPS |
| medium | 209 FPS | 349 FPS |
| high | 169 FPS | 270 FPS |
| ultra | 137 FPS | 226 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 213 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 181 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 150 FPS |
| ultra | 63 FPS | 124 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | RTX A5500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 812 FPS | 894 FPS |
| medium | 642 FPS | 726 FPS |
| high | 551 FPS | 631 FPS |
| ultra | 440 FPS | 475 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 700 FPS |
| medium | 443 FPS | 564 FPS |
| high | 379 FPS | 475 FPS |
| ultra | 329 FPS | 356 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 365 FPS | 475 FPS |
| medium | 297 FPS | 380 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 317 FPS |
| ultra | 186 FPS | 237 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | RTX A5500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 746 FPS | 354 FPS |
| medium | 613 FPS | 316 FPS |
| high | 536 FPS | 278 FPS |
| ultra | 440 FPS | 238 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 594 FPS | 270 FPS |
| medium | 486 FPS | 247 FPS |
| high | 421 FPS | 213 FPS |
| ultra | 330 FPS | 179 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 358 FPS | 176 FPS |
| medium | 308 FPS | 154 FPS |
| high | 285 FPS | 118 FPS |
| ultra | 220 FPS | 95 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 and RTX A5500

GeForce RTX 4060
GeForce RTX 4060
The GeForce RTX 4060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1830 MHz to 2460 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,548 points. Launch price was $299.

RTX A5500
RTX A5500
The RTX A5500 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1080 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 10240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 80 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 21,108 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 scores 19,548 versus the RTX A5500's 21,108 — the RTX A5500 leads by 8%. The GeForce RTX 4060 is built on Ada Lovelace while the RTX A5500 uses Ampere, both on 5 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 10,240 (RTX A5500). Raw compute: 15.11 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 34.1 TFLOPS (RTX A5500). Boost clocks: 2460 MHz vs 1665 MHz. Ray tracing: 24 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 80 (RTX A5500) with 96 Tensor cores vs 320.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | RTX A5500 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 19,548 | 21,108+8% |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ampere |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 3072 | 10240+233% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 15.11 TFLOPS | 34.1 TFLOPS+126% |
| Boost Clock | 2460 MHz+48% | 1665 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 96+100% |
| TMUs | 96 | 320+233% |
| L1 Cache | 3 MB | 10 MB+233% |
| L2 Cache | 24 MB+300% | 6 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 24 | 80+233% |
| Tensor Cores | 96 | 320+233% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The RTX A5500 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The RTX A5500 supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 4060 is capped at DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | RTX A5500 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4060 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the RTX A5500 has 24 GB. The RTX A5500 offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 272 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 768 GB/s (RTX A5500) — a 182.4% advantage for the RTX A5500. Bus width: 128-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 24 MB (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 6 MB (RTX A5500) — the GeForce RTX 4060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | RTX A5500 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 24 GB+200% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 272 GB/s | 768 GB/s+182% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 384-bit+200% |
| L2 Cache | 24 MB+300% | 6 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 12.1 (RTX A5500). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | RTX A5500 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 7th Gen NVENC (2x) (RTX A5500). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A5500).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | RTX A5500 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 8th gen | 7th Gen NVENC (2x) |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 draws 115W versus the RTX A5500's 230W — a 66.7% difference. The GeForce RTX 4060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 450W (RTX A5500). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 240mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 73°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | RTX A5500 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 115W-50% | 230W |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 450W-18% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 240mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 73°C-9% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 170.0+85% | 91.8 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4060 launched at $299 MSRP, while the RTX A5500 launched at $3600. The GeForce RTX 4060 costs 91.7% less ($3301 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 65.4 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 5.9 (RTX A5500) — the GeForce RTX 4060 offers 1008.5% better value. The GeForce RTX 4060 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2022).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | RTX A5500 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $299-92% | $3600 |
| Performance per Dollar | 65.4+1008% | 5.9 |
| Codename | AD107 | GA102 |
| Release | May 18 2023 | March 22 2022 |
| Ranking | #84 | #67 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












