
GeForce RTX 4060
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 6700 XT
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4060
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $180 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $479 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 58.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 41.2 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $479 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 115W instead of 230W, a 115W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 6700 XT across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Radeon RX 6700 XT
2021Why buy it
- ✅9.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌60.2% HIGHER MSRP$479 MSRPvs$299 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 41.2 vs 65.4 G3D/$ ($479 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ❌100% higher power demand at 230W vs 115W.
GeForce RTX 4060
2023Radeon RX 6700 XT
2021Why buy it
- ✅Costs $180 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $479 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 58.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 41.2 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $479 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 115W instead of 230W, a 115W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅9.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 6700 XT across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌60.2% HIGHER MSRP$479 MSRPvs$299 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 41.2 vs 65.4 G3D/$ ($479 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ❌100% higher power demand at 230W vs 115W.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon RX 6700 XT better than GeForce RTX 4060?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce RTX 4060 make more sense than Radeon RX 6700 XT?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon RX 6700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 167 FPS | 179 FPS |
| medium | 152 FPS | 159 FPS |
| high | 134 FPS | 145 FPS |
| ultra | 115 FPS | 122 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 137 FPS | 145 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 117 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 108 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 97 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 86 FPS | 87 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 73 FPS |
| high | 62 FPS | 60 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 52 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon RX 6700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 392 FPS | 479 FPS |
| medium | 334 FPS | 405 FPS |
| high | 268 FPS | 326 FPS |
| ultra | 211 FPS | 274 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 240 FPS | 298 FPS |
| medium | 209 FPS | 246 FPS |
| high | 169 FPS | 206 FPS |
| ultra | 137 FPS | 173 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 131 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 112 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 63 FPS | 70 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon RX 6700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 812 FPS | 867 FPS |
| medium | 642 FPS | 705 FPS |
| high | 551 FPS | 593 FPS |
| ultra | 440 FPS | 444 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 663 FPS |
| medium | 443 FPS | 532 FPS |
| high | 379 FPS | 444 FPS |
| ultra | 329 FPS | 333 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 365 FPS | 444 FPS |
| medium | 297 FPS | 356 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 296 FPS |
| ultra | 186 FPS | 222 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon RX 6700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 746 FPS | 703 FPS |
| medium | 613 FPS | 585 FPS |
| high | 536 FPS | 491 FPS |
| ultra | 440 FPS | 412 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 594 FPS | 541 FPS |
| medium | 486 FPS | 451 FPS |
| high | 421 FPS | 367 FPS |
| ultra | 330 FPS | 308 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 358 FPS | 322 FPS |
| medium | 308 FPS | 285 FPS |
| high | 285 FPS | 257 FPS |
| ultra | 220 FPS | 210 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 and Radeon RX 6700 XT

GeForce RTX 4060
GeForce RTX 4060
The GeForce RTX 4060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1830 MHz to 2460 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,548 points. Launch price was $299.

Radeon RX 6700 XT
Radeon RX 6700 XT
The Radeon RX 6700 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 3 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2321 MHz to 2581 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,754 points. Launch price was $479.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 4060 scores 19,548 and the Radeon RX 6700 XT reaches 19,754 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 4060 is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon RX 6700 XT uses RDNA 2.0, both on 5 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 2,560 (Radeon RX 6700 XT). Raw compute: 15.11 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 13.21 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6700 XT). Boost clocks: 2460 MHz vs 2581 MHz. Ray tracing: 24 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 40 (Radeon RX 6700 XT) with 96 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon RX 6700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 19,548 | 19,754+1% |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 3072+20% | 2560 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 15.11 TFLOPS+14% | 13.21 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2460 MHz | 2581 MHz+5% |
| ROPs | 48 | 64+33% |
| TMUs | 96 | 160+67% |
| L1 Cache | 3 MB+500% | 0.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 24 MB+700% | 3 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 24 | 40+67% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
Both GPUs support Frame Generation technologies, but they achieve it differently. The GeForce RTX 4060 uses DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, while the Radeon RX 6700 XT relies on FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. Both can significantly boost FPS in supported titles, but they are not on the same feature stack.The GeForce RTX 4060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 6700 XT relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon RX 6700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4060 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 6700 XT has 12 GB. The Radeon RX 6700 XT offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 272 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 384 GB/s (Radeon RX 6700 XT) — a 41.2% advantage for the Radeon RX 6700 XT. Bus width: 128-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 24 MB (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 3 MB (Radeon RX 6700 XT) — the GeForce RTX 4060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon RX 6700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 12 GB+50% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 272 GB/s | 384 GB/s+41% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 192-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 24 MB+700% | 3 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 12 Ultimate (Radeon RX 6700 XT). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon RX 6700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4060) vs VCE (Radeon RX 6700 XT). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs UVD. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (Radeon RX 6700 XT).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon RX 6700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 8th gen | VCE |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | UVD |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 draws 115W versus the Radeon RX 6700 XT's 230W — a 66.7% difference. The GeForce RTX 4060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 650W (Radeon RX 6700 XT). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 6-pin + 8-pin. Card length: 240mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 73°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon RX 6700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 115W-50% | 230W |
| Recommended PSU | 550W-15% | 650W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 6-pin + 8-pin |
| Length | 240mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 110mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 73°C-3% | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 170.0+98% | 85.9 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4060 launched at $299 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 6700 XT launched at $479. The GeForce RTX 4060 costs 37.6% less ($180 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 65.4 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 41.2 (Radeon RX 6700 XT) — the GeForce RTX 4060 offers 58.7% better value. The GeForce RTX 4060 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2021).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon RX 6700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $299-38% | $479 |
| Performance per Dollar | 65.4+59% | 41.2 |
| Codename | AD107 | Navi 22 |
| Release | May 18 2023 | March 3 2021 |
| Ranking | #84 | #80 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












