
GeForce RTX 4060
Popular choices:

RTX A4000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4060
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $812 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $1,111 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 273.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 17.5 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $1,111 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 115W instead of 140W, a 25W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX A4000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (96 vs 192), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
RTX A4000
2021Why buy it
- ✅17.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅100% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (192 vs 96).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌271.6% HIGHER MSRP$1,111 MSRPvs$299 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 17.5 vs 65.4 G3D/$ ($1,111 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ❌21.7% higher power demand at 140W vs 115W.
GeForce RTX 4060
2023RTX A4000
2021Why buy it
- ✅Costs $812 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $1,111 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 273.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 17.5 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $1,111 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 115W instead of 140W, a 25W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅17.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅100% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (192 vs 96).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX A4000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (96 vs 192), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌271.6% HIGHER MSRP$1,111 MSRPvs$299 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 17.5 vs 65.4 G3D/$ ($1,111 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ❌21.7% higher power demand at 140W vs 115W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4060 better than RTX A4000?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is RTX A4000 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | RTX A4000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 167 FPS | 166 FPS |
| medium | 152 FPS | 148 FPS |
| high | 134 FPS | 125 FPS |
| ultra | 115 FPS | 90 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 137 FPS | 146 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 124 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 66 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 86 FPS | 70 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 62 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 38 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | RTX A4000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 392 FPS | 261 FPS |
| medium | 334 FPS | 219 FPS |
| high | 268 FPS | 182 FPS |
| ultra | 211 FPS | 158 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 240 FPS | 187 FPS |
| medium | 209 FPS | 150 FPS |
| high | 169 FPS | 129 FPS |
| ultra | 137 FPS | 107 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 95 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 78 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 68 FPS |
| ultra | 63 FPS | 53 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | RTX A4000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 812 FPS | 873 FPS |
| medium | 642 FPS | 701 FPS |
| high | 551 FPS | 584 FPS |
| ultra | 440 FPS | 438 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 657 FPS |
| medium | 443 FPS | 526 FPS |
| high | 379 FPS | 438 FPS |
| ultra | 329 FPS | 328 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 365 FPS | 438 FPS |
| medium | 297 FPS | 350 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 292 FPS |
| ultra | 186 FPS | 219 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | RTX A4000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 746 FPS | 282 FPS |
| medium | 613 FPS | 246 FPS |
| high | 536 FPS | 201 FPS |
| ultra | 440 FPS | 173 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 594 FPS | 217 FPS |
| medium | 486 FPS | 193 FPS |
| high | 421 FPS | 159 FPS |
| ultra | 330 FPS | 134 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 358 FPS | 132 FPS |
| medium | 308 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 285 FPS | 90 FPS |
| ultra | 220 FPS | 73 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 and RTX A4000

GeForce RTX 4060
GeForce RTX 4060
The GeForce RTX 4060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1830 MHz to 2460 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,548 points. Launch price was $299.

RTX A4000
RTX A4000
The RTX A4000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 735 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 140W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,463 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 4060 scores 19,548 and the RTX A4000 reaches 19,463 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 4060 is built on Ada Lovelace while the RTX A4000 uses Ampere, both on 5 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 6,144 (RTX A4000). Raw compute: 15.11 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 19.17 TFLOPS (RTX A4000). Boost clocks: 2460 MHz vs 1560 MHz. Ray tracing: 24 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 48 (RTX A4000) with 96 Tensor cores vs 192.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | RTX A4000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 19,548 | 19,463 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ampere |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 3072 | 6144+100% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 15.11 TFLOPS | 19.17 TFLOPS+27% |
| Boost Clock | 2460 MHz+58% | 1560 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 96+100% |
| TMUs | 96 | 192+100% |
| L1 Cache | 3 MB | 6 MB+100% |
| L2 Cache | 24 MB+500% | 4 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 24 | 48+100% |
| Tensor Cores | 96 | 192+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The RTX A4000 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The RTX A4000 supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 4060 is capped at DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | RTX A4000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4060 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the RTX A4000 has 16 GB. The RTX A4000 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 272 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 448 GB/s (RTX A4000) — a 64.7% advantage for the RTX A4000. Bus width: 128-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 24 MB (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 4 MB (RTX A4000) — the GeForce RTX 4060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | RTX A4000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 16 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 272 GB/s | 448 GB/s+65% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 192-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 24 MB+500% | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 12.2 (RTX A4000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | RTX A4000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 7th Gen NVENC (RTX A4000). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A4000).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | RTX A4000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 8th gen | 7th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 draws 115W versus the RTX A4000's 140W — a 19.6% difference. The GeForce RTX 4060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 650W (RTX A4000). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 240mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 73°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | RTX A4000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 115W-18% | 140W |
| Recommended PSU | 550W-15% | 650W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 240mm | 241mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 73°C-3% | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 170.0+22% | 139.0 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4060 launched at $299 MSRP, while the RTX A4000 launched at $1111. The GeForce RTX 4060 costs 73.1% less ($812 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 65.4 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 17.5 (RTX A4000) — the GeForce RTX 4060 offers 273.7% better value. The GeForce RTX 4060 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2021).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | RTX A4000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $299-73% | $1111 |
| Performance per Dollar | 65.4+274% | 17.5 |
| Codename | AD107 | GA104 |
| Release | May 18 2023 | April 12 2021 |
| Ranking | #84 | #85 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












