
Radeon R9 280X
Popular choices:

RTX A500 Embedded GPU
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon R9 280X
2013Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 20.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 3 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 3 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌900% higher power demand at 200W vs 20W.
RTX A500 Embedded GPU
2022Why buy it
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 3 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 20W instead of 200W, a 180W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 20.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
Radeon R9 280X
2013RTX A500 Embedded GPU
2022Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 20.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 3 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 20W instead of 200W, a 180W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 3 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 3 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌900% higher power demand at 200W vs 20W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 20.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is RTX A500 Embedded GPU better than Radeon R9 280X?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon R9 280X still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon R9 280X | RTX A500 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 100 FPS | 81 FPS |
| medium | 82 FPS | 70 FPS |
| high | 64 FPS | 57 FPS |
| ultra | 38 FPS | 37 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 83 FPS | 71 FPS |
| medium | 70 FPS | 62 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 28 FPS | 28 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 27 FPS | 26 FPS |
| medium | 26 FPS | 24 FPS |
| high | 16 FPS | 16 FPS |
| ultra | 14 FPS | 14 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon R9 280X | RTX A500 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 151 FPS | 115 FPS |
| medium | 125 FPS | 90 FPS |
| high | 103 FPS | 70 FPS |
| ultra | 76 FPS | 53 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 91 FPS | 86 FPS |
| medium | 67 FPS | 64 FPS |
| high | 50 FPS | 52 FPS |
| ultra | 38 FPS | 40 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 37 FPS | 51 FPS |
| medium | 27 FPS | 39 FPS |
| high | 21 FPS | 31 FPS |
| ultra | 15 FPS | 23 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon R9 280X | RTX A500 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 274 FPS | 279 FPS |
| medium | 220 FPS | 223 FPS |
| high | 183 FPS | 186 FPS |
| ultra | 137 FPS | 139 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 206 FPS | 209 FPS |
| medium | 165 FPS | 167 FPS |
| high | 137 FPS | 139 FPS |
| ultra | 103 FPS | 105 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 137 FPS | 139 FPS |
| medium | 110 FPS | 112 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 93 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 70 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon R9 280X | RTX A500 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 179 FPS | 156 FPS |
| medium | 148 FPS | 127 FPS |
| high | 132 FPS | 108 FPS |
| ultra | 106 FPS | 89 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 126 FPS | 112 FPS |
| medium | 105 FPS | 93 FPS |
| high | 94 FPS | 80 FPS |
| ultra | 70 FPS | 66 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 74 FPS | 66 FPS |
| medium | 59 FPS | 54 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 32 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R9 280X and RTX A500 Embedded GPU

Radeon R9 280X
Radeon R9 280X
The Radeon R9 280X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,100 points. Launch price was $299.

RTX A500 Embedded GPU
RTX A500 Embedded GPU
The RTX A500 Embedded GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 30 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 435 MHz to 1335 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 20W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,197 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R9 280X scores 6,100 and the RTX A500 Embedded GPU reaches 6,197 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 280X is built on GCN 1.0 while the RTX A500 Embedded GPU uses Ampere, both on 28 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (Radeon R9 280X) vs 2,048 (RTX A500 Embedded GPU). Raw compute: 4.096 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 280X) vs 5.468 TFLOPS (RTX A500 Embedded GPU). Boost clocks: 1000 MHz vs 1335 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon R9 280X | RTX A500 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,100 | 6,197+2% |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.096 TFLOPS | 5.468 TFLOPS+33% |
| Boost Clock | 1000 MHz | 1335 MHz+34% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 128+100% | 64 |
| L1 Cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB+300% |
| L2 Cache | 0.75 MB | 2 MB+167% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The RTX A500 Embedded GPU gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon R9 280X relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | Radeon R9 280X | RTX A500 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon R9 280X comes with 3 GB of VRAM, while the RTX A500 Embedded GPU has 4 GB. The RTX A500 Embedded GPU offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 384-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.75 MB (Radeon R9 280X) vs 2 MB (RTX A500 Embedded GPU) — the RTX A500 Embedded GPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon R9 280X | RTX A500 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 3 GB | 4 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+200% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.75 MB | 2 MB+167% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_1) (Radeon R9 280X) vs 12_2 (RTX A500 Embedded GPU). Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 0.
| Feature | Radeon R9 280X | RTX A500 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12_2 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 2.0 (Radeon R9 280X) vs NVENC 7th Gen (RTX A500 Embedded GPU). Decoder: UVD 4.2 vs NVDEC 5th Gen.
| Feature | Radeon R9 280X | RTX A500 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 2.0 | NVENC 7th Gen |
| Decoder | UVD 4.2 | NVDEC 5th Gen |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R9 280X draws 200W versus the RTX A500 Embedded GPU's 20W — a 163.6% difference. The RTX A500 Embedded GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon R9 280X) vs 350W (RTX A500 Embedded GPU). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon R9 280X | RTX A500 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 20W-90% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 350W-30% |
| Power Connector | 6-pin + 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 82mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 30.5 | 309.9+916% |
Value Analysis
The RTX A500 Embedded GPU is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2013).
| Feature | Radeon R9 280X | RTX A500 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $299 | — |
| Codename | Tahiti | GA107S |
| Release | October 8 2013 | March 30 2022 |
| Ranking | #404 | #389 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













