
GeForce GTX 960
Popular choices:

RTX A500 Embedded GPU
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 960
2015Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 30.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌400% higher power demand at 100W vs 20W.
- ❌193.9% longer card at 241mm vs 82mm.
RTX A500 Embedded GPU
2022Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 20W instead of 100W, a 80W reduction.
- ✅Measures 82mm instead of 241mm, a 159mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 30.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
GeForce GTX 960
2015RTX A500 Embedded GPU
2022Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 30.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 20W instead of 100W, a 80W reduction.
- ✅Measures 82mm instead of 241mm, a 159mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌400% higher power demand at 100W vs 20W.
- ❌193.9% longer card at 241mm vs 82mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 30.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is RTX A500 Embedded GPU better than GeForce GTX 960?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 960 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 960 | RTX A500 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 103 FPS | 81 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 70 FPS |
| high | 72 FPS | 57 FPS |
| ultra | 42 FPS | 37 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 90 FPS | 71 FPS |
| medium | 77 FPS | 62 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 32 FPS | 28 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 28 FPS | 26 FPS |
| medium | 26 FPS | 24 FPS |
| high | 18 FPS | 16 FPS |
| ultra | 15 FPS | 14 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 960 | RTX A500 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 139 FPS | 115 FPS |
| medium | 109 FPS | 90 FPS |
| high | 88 FPS | 70 FPS |
| ultra | 53 FPS | 53 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 86 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 64 FPS |
| high | 42 FPS | 52 FPS |
| ultra | 28 FPS | 40 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 27 FPS | 51 FPS |
| medium | 19 FPS | 39 FPS |
| high | 16 FPS | 31 FPS |
| ultra | 11 FPS | 23 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 960 | RTX A500 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 276 FPS | 279 FPS |
| medium | 221 FPS | 223 FPS |
| high | 184 FPS | 186 FPS |
| ultra | 138 FPS | 139 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 207 FPS | 209 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 167 FPS |
| high | 138 FPS | 139 FPS |
| ultra | 103 FPS | 105 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 138 FPS | 139 FPS |
| medium | 110 FPS | 112 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 93 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 70 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 960 | RTX A500 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 168 FPS | 156 FPS |
| medium | 139 FPS | 127 FPS |
| high | 125 FPS | 108 FPS |
| ultra | 101 FPS | 89 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 112 FPS |
| medium | 99 FPS | 93 FPS |
| high | 89 FPS | 80 FPS |
| ultra | 70 FPS | 66 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 68 FPS | 66 FPS |
| medium | 55 FPS | 54 FPS |
| high | 45 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 32 FPS | 32 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 960 and RTX A500 Embedded GPU

GeForce GTX 960
GeForce GTX 960
The GeForce GTX 960 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 22 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1127 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,133 points. Launch price was $199.

RTX A500 Embedded GPU
RTX A500 Embedded GPU
The RTX A500 Embedded GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 30 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 435 MHz to 1335 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 20W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,197 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 960 scores 6,133 and the RTX A500 Embedded GPU reaches 6,197 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 960 is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the RTX A500 Embedded GPU uses Ampere, both on 28 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (GeForce GTX 960) vs 2,048 (RTX A500 Embedded GPU). Raw compute: 2.413 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 960) vs 5.468 TFLOPS (RTX A500 Embedded GPU). Boost clocks: 1178 MHz vs 1335 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 960 | RTX A500 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,133 | 6,197+1% |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 1024 | 2048+100% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.413 TFLOPS | 5.468 TFLOPS+127% |
| Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | 1335 MHz+13% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 64 | 64 |
| L1 Cache | 0.38 MB | 2 MB+426% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 960 | RTX A500 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 960) vs 2 MB (RTX A500 Embedded GPU) — the RTX A500 Embedded GPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 960 | RTX A500 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 960) vs 12_2 (RTX A500 Embedded GPU). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 960 | RTX A500 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12_2 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce GTX 960) vs NVENC 7th Gen (RTX A500 Embedded GPU). Decoder: NVDEC (2nd Gen) vs NVDEC 5th Gen.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 960 | RTX A500 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (5th Gen) | NVENC 7th Gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC (2nd Gen) | NVDEC 5th Gen |
| Codecs | HEVC,H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,VP8 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 960 draws 100W versus the RTX A500 Embedded GPU's 20W — a 133.3% difference. The RTX A500 Embedded GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 960) vs 350W (RTX A500 Embedded GPU). Power connectors: 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 241mm vs 82mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 960 | RTX A500 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W | 20W-80% |
| Recommended PSU | 400W | 350W-13% |
| Power Connector | 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 241mm | 82mm |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75 C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 61.3 | 309.9+406% |
Value Analysis
The RTX A500 Embedded GPU is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 960 | RTX A500 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $199 | — |
| Codename | GM206 | GA107S |
| Release | January 22 2015 | March 30 2022 |
| Ranking | #393 | #389 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













