
GeForce RTX 3090
Popular choices:

RTX 5880 Ada Generation
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3090
2020Why buy it
- ✅2.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $4,501 less on MSRP ($1,499 MSRP vs $6,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 324.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 17.7 vs 4.2 G3D/$ ($1,499 MSRP vs $6,000 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 24 GB vs 48 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (328 vs 440), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: RTX 5880 Ada Generation is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌22.8% higher power demand at 350W vs 285W.
- ❌16.9% longer card at 312mm vs 267mm.
RTX 5880 Ada Generation
2024Why buy it
- ✅34.1% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (440 vs 328).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (48 GB vs 24 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 285W instead of 350W, a 65W reduction.
- ✅Measures 267mm instead of 312mm, a 45mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3090 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌300.3% HIGHER MSRP$6,000 MSRPvs$1,499 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 4.2 vs 17.7 G3D/$ ($6,000 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3090
2020RTX 5880 Ada Generation
2024Why buy it
- ✅2.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $4,501 less on MSRP ($1,499 MSRP vs $6,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 324.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 17.7 vs 4.2 G3D/$ ($1,499 MSRP vs $6,000 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
Why buy it
- ✅34.1% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (440 vs 328).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (48 GB vs 24 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 285W instead of 350W, a 65W reduction.
- ✅Measures 267mm instead of 312mm, a 45mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 24 GB vs 48 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (328 vs 440), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: RTX 5880 Ada Generation is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌22.8% higher power demand at 350W vs 285W.
- ❌16.9% longer card at 312mm vs 267mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3090 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌300.3% HIGHER MSRP$6,000 MSRPvs$1,499 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 4.2 vs 17.7 G3D/$ ($6,000 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3090 better than RTX 5880 Ada Generation?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does RTX 5880 Ada Generation make more sense than GeForce RTX 3090?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3090 | RTX 5880 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 259 FPS | 222 FPS |
| medium | 240 FPS | 194 FPS |
| high | 201 FPS | 161 FPS |
| ultra | 176 FPS | 113 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 249 FPS | 199 FPS |
| medium | 208 FPS | 166 FPS |
| high | 162 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 145 FPS | 83 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 167 FPS | 105 FPS |
| medium | 138 FPS | 88 FPS |
| high | 98 FPS | 59 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 51 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3090 | RTX 5880 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 648 FPS | 605 FPS |
| medium | 557 FPS | 491 FPS |
| high | 440 FPS | 384 FPS |
| ultra | 382 FPS | 329 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 475 FPS | 504 FPS |
| medium | 405 FPS | 423 FPS |
| high | 319 FPS | 337 FPS |
| ultra | 263 FPS | 261 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 229 FPS | 280 FPS |
| medium | 193 FPS | 238 FPS |
| high | 161 FPS | 212 FPS |
| ultra | 134 FPS | 173 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3090 | RTX 5880 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 909 FPS | 915 FPS |
| medium | 745 FPS | 750 FPS |
| high | 664 FPS | 676 FPS |
| ultra | 574 FPS | 565 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 711 FPS | 709 FPS |
| medium | 583 FPS | 580 FPS |
| high | 508 FPS | 510 FPS |
| ultra | 434 FPS | 423 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 489 FPS | 486 FPS |
| medium | 406 FPS | 402 FPS |
| high | 349 FPS | 346 FPS |
| ultra | 289 FPS | 282 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3090 | RTX 5880 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 821 FPS | 377 FPS |
| medium | 765 FPS | 330 FPS |
| high | 675 FPS | 287 FPS |
| ultra | 598 FPS | 242 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 656 FPS | 277 FPS |
| medium | 609 FPS | 248 FPS |
| high | 534 FPS | 213 FPS |
| ultra | 449 FPS | 178 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 475 FPS | 189 FPS |
| medium | 443 FPS | 162 FPS |
| high | 397 FPS | 125 FPS |
| ultra | 299 FPS | 101 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3090 and RTX 5880 Ada Generation

GeForce RTX 3090
GeForce RTX 3090
The GeForce RTX 3090 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1695 MHz. It has 10496 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 350W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 82 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,594 points. Launch price was $1,499.

RTX 5880 Ada Generation
RTX 5880 Ada Generation
The RTX 5880 Ada Generation is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 5 2024. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 975 MHz to 2460 MHz. It has 14080 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 285W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 110 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 25,096 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3090 scores 26,594 versus the RTX 5880 Ada Generation's 25,096 — the GeForce RTX 3090 leads by 6%. The GeForce RTX 3090 is built on Ampere while the RTX 5880 Ada Generation uses Ada Lovelace, both on 8 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 10,496 (GeForce RTX 3090) vs 14,080 (RTX 5880 Ada Generation). Raw compute: 35.58 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3090) vs 69.27 TFLOPS (RTX 5880 Ada Generation). Boost clocks: 1695 MHz vs 2460 MHz. Ray tracing: 82 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3090) vs 110 (RTX 5880 Ada Generation) with 328 Tensor cores vs 440.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3090 | RTX 5880 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 26,594+6% | 25,096 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 10496 | 14080+34% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 35.58 TFLOPS | 69.27 TFLOPS+95% |
| Boost Clock | 1695 MHz | 2460 MHz+45% |
| ROPs | 112 | 176+57% |
| TMUs | 328 | 440+34% |
| L1 Cache | 10.3 MB | 13.8 MB+34% |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB | 72 MB+1100% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 82 | 110+34% |
| Tensor Cores | 328 | 440+34% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The RTX 5880 Ada Generation supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 3090 is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3090 | RTX 5880 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3090 comes with 24 GB of VRAM, while the RTX 5880 Ada Generation has 48 GB. The RTX 5880 Ada Generation offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 936 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3090) vs 768 GB/s (RTX 5880 Ada Generation) — a 21.9% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3090. Bus width: 384-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 6 MB (GeForce RTX 3090) vs 72 MB (RTX 5880 Ada Generation) — the RTX 5880 Ada Generation has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3090 | RTX 5880 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 24 GB | 48 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 936 GB/s+22% | 768 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 384-bit | 384-bit |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB | 72 MB+1100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3090) vs 12 Ultimate (RTX 5880 Ada Generation). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3090 | RTX 5880 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3090) vs NVENC 8th gen (RTX 5880 Ada Generation). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs NVDEC 5th gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 3090) vs MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP8,VP9 (RTX 5880 Ada Generation).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3090 | RTX 5880 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th gen | NVENC 8th gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | NVDEC 5th gen |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 | MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP8,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3090 draws 350W versus the RTX 5880 Ada Generation's 285W — a 20.5% difference. The RTX 5880 Ada Generation is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 750W (GeForce RTX 3090) vs 650W (RTX 5880 Ada Generation). Power connectors: 2x 8-pin vs 16-pin. Card length: 312mm vs 267mm, occupying 3 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3090 | RTX 5880 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 350W | 285W-19% |
| Recommended PSU | 750W | 650W-13% |
| Power Connector | 2x 8-pin | 16-pin |
| Length | 312mm | 267mm |
| Height | 140mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 3 | 2-33% |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 80°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 76.0 | 88.1+16% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3090 launched at $1499 MSRP, while the RTX 5880 Ada Generation launched at $6000. The GeForce RTX 3090 costs 75% less ($4501 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 17.7 (GeForce RTX 3090) vs 4.2 (RTX 5880 Ada Generation) — the GeForce RTX 3090 offers 321.4% better value. The RTX 5880 Ada Generation is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2020).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3090 | RTX 5880 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1499-75% | $6000 |
| Performance per Dollar | 17.7+321% | 4.2 |
| Codename | GA102 | AD102 |
| Release | September 1 2020 | January 5 2024 |
| Ranking | #37 | #40 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












