
GeForce RTX 3090
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 4070
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3090
2020Why buy it
- ✅19.4% more average FPS across 13 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅78.3% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (328 vs 184).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 12 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌150.3% HIGHER MSRP$1,499 MSRPvs$599 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 17.7 vs 44.9 G3D/$ ($1,499 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ❌75% higher power demand at 350W vs 200W.
GeForce RTX 4070
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $900 less on MSRP ($599 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 153.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 17.7 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 200W instead of 350W, a 150W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3090 across 13 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (184 vs 328), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
GeForce RTX 3090
2020GeForce RTX 4070
2023Why buy it
- ✅19.4% more average FPS across 13 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅78.3% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (328 vs 184).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 12 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $900 less on MSRP ($599 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 153.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 17.7 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 200W instead of 350W, a 150W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌150.3% HIGHER MSRP$1,499 MSRPvs$599 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 17.7 vs 44.9 G3D/$ ($1,499 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ❌75% higher power demand at 350W vs 200W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3090 across 13 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (184 vs 328), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4070 better than GeForce RTX 3090?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce RTX 3090 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3090 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 259 FPS | 183 FPS |
| medium | 240 FPS | 167 FPS |
| high | 201 FPS | 151 FPS |
| ultra | 176 FPS | 131 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 249 FPS | 150 FPS |
| medium | 208 FPS | 124 FPS |
| high | 162 FPS | 110 FPS |
| ultra | 145 FPS | 101 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 167 FPS | 92 FPS |
| medium | 138 FPS | 78 FPS |
| high | 98 FPS | 65 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 58 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3090 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 648 FPS | 544 FPS |
| medium | 557 FPS | 454 FPS |
| high | 440 FPS | 353 FPS |
| ultra | 382 FPS | 299 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 475 FPS | 351 FPS |
| medium | 405 FPS | 288 FPS |
| high | 319 FPS | 235 FPS |
| ultra | 263 FPS | 197 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 229 FPS | 172 FPS |
| medium | 193 FPS | 144 FPS |
| high | 161 FPS | 125 FPS |
| ultra | 134 FPS | 101 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3090 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 909 FPS | 884 FPS |
| medium | 745 FPS | 713 FPS |
| high | 664 FPS | 643 FPS |
| ultra | 574 FPS | 569 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 711 FPS | 684 FPS |
| medium | 583 FPS | 549 FPS |
| high | 508 FPS | 483 FPS |
| ultra | 434 FPS | 424 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 489 FPS | 467 FPS |
| medium | 406 FPS | 373 FPS |
| high | 349 FPS | 326 FPS |
| ultra | 289 FPS | 277 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3090 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 821 FPS | 751 FPS |
| medium | 765 FPS | 612 FPS |
| high | 675 FPS | 536 FPS |
| ultra | 598 FPS | 497 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 656 FPS | 615 FPS |
| medium | 609 FPS | 500 FPS |
| high | 534 FPS | 433 FPS |
| ultra | 449 FPS | 395 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 475 FPS | 384 FPS |
| medium | 443 FPS | 324 FPS |
| high | 397 FPS | 301 FPS |
| ultra | 299 FPS | 272 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3090 and GeForce RTX 4070

GeForce RTX 3090
GeForce RTX 3090
The GeForce RTX 3090 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1695 MHz. It has 10496 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 350W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 82 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,594 points. Launch price was $1,499.

GeForce RTX 4070
GeForce RTX 4070
The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 3090 scores 26,594 and the GeForce RTX 4070 reaches 26,919 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 3090 is built on Ampere while the GeForce RTX 4070 uses Ada Lovelace, both on 8 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 10,496 (GeForce RTX 3090) vs 5,888 (GeForce RTX 4070). Raw compute: 35.58 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3090) vs 29.15 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070). Boost clocks: 1695 MHz vs 2475 MHz. Ray tracing: 82 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3090) vs 46 (GeForce RTX 4070) with 328 Tensor cores vs 184.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3090 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 26,594 | 26,919+1% |
| Architecture | Ampere | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 10496+78% | 5888 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 35.58 TFLOPS+22% | 29.15 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1695 MHz | 2475 MHz+46% |
| ROPs | 112+75% | 64 |
| TMUs | 328+78% | 184 |
| L1 Cache | 10.3 MB+78% | 5.8 MB |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB | 36 MB+500% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 82+78% | 46 |
| Tensor Cores | 328+78% | 184 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce RTX 3090 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 supports the newer DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce RTX 3090 is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3090 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3090 comes with 24 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4070 has 12 GB. The GeForce RTX 3090 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 936 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3090) vs 504 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070) — a 85.7% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3090. Bus width: 384-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 6 MB (GeForce RTX 3090) vs 36 MB (GeForce RTX 4070) — the GeForce RTX 4070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3090 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 24 GB+100% | 12 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR6X |
| Memory Bandwidth | 936 GB/s+86% | 504 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+100% | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB | 36 MB+500% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3090) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4070). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3090 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3090) vs 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (GeForce RTX 4070). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 3090) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4070).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3090 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th gen | 8th Gen NVENC (2x) |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3090 draws 350W versus the GeForce RTX 4070's 200W — a 54.5% difference. The GeForce RTX 4070 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 750W (GeForce RTX 3090) vs 650W (GeForce RTX 4070). Power connectors: 2x 8-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 312mm vs 304mm, occupying 3 vs 3 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3090 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 350W | 200W-43% |
| Recommended PSU | 750W | 650W-13% |
| Power Connector | 2x 8-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 312mm | 304mm |
| Height | 140mm | 137mm |
| Slots | 3 | 3 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 80°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 76.0 | 134.6+77% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3090 launched at $1499 MSRP, while the GeForce RTX 4070 launched at $599. The GeForce RTX 4070 costs 60% less ($900 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 17.7 (GeForce RTX 3090) vs 44.9 (GeForce RTX 4070) — the GeForce RTX 4070 offers 153.7% better value. The GeForce RTX 4070 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2020).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3090 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1499 | $599-60% |
| Performance per Dollar | 17.7 | 44.9+154% |
| Codename | GA102 | AD104 |
| Release | September 1 2020 | April 12 2023 |
| Ranking | #37 | #32 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












