
GeForce RTX 4060
Popular choices:

TITAN RTX
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4060
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,200 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 713% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 8.0 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 115W instead of 280W, a 165W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than TITAN RTX across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (96 vs 576), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
TITAN RTX
2018Why buy it
- ✅43.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅500% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (576 vs 96).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 24 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌735.8% HIGHER MSRP$2,499 MSRPvs$299 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 8.0 vs 65.4 G3D/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ❌143.5% higher power demand at 280W vs 115W.
GeForce RTX 4060
2023TITAN RTX
2018Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,200 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 713% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 8.0 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 115W instead of 280W, a 165W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅43.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅500% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (576 vs 96).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than TITAN RTX across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (96 vs 576), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 24 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌735.8% HIGHER MSRP$2,499 MSRPvs$299 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 8.0 vs 65.4 G3D/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ❌143.5% higher power demand at 280W vs 115W.
Quick Answers
So, is TITAN RTX better than GeForce RTX 4060?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce RTX 4060 make more sense than TITAN RTX?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 167 FPS | 199 FPS |
| medium | 152 FPS | 185 FPS |
| high | 134 FPS | 161 FPS |
| ultra | 115 FPS | 145 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 137 FPS | 182 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 154 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 126 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 115 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 86 FPS | 115 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 95 FPS |
| high | 62 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 66 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 392 FPS | 509 FPS |
| medium | 334 FPS | 438 FPS |
| high | 268 FPS | 358 FPS |
| ultra | 211 FPS | 307 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 240 FPS | 334 FPS |
| medium | 209 FPS | 275 FPS |
| high | 169 FPS | 228 FPS |
| ultra | 137 FPS | 186 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 151 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 130 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 108 FPS |
| ultra | 63 FPS | 86 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 812 FPS | 904 FPS |
| medium | 642 FPS | 723 FPS |
| high | 551 FPS | 603 FPS |
| ultra | 440 FPS | 452 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 678 FPS |
| medium | 443 FPS | 543 FPS |
| high | 379 FPS | 452 FPS |
| ultra | 329 FPS | 339 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 365 FPS | 452 FPS |
| medium | 297 FPS | 362 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 301 FPS |
| ultra | 186 FPS | 226 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 746 FPS | 632 FPS |
| medium | 613 FPS | 555 FPS |
| high | 536 FPS | 478 FPS |
| ultra | 440 FPS | 439 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 594 FPS | 525 FPS |
| medium | 486 FPS | 459 FPS |
| high | 421 FPS | 396 FPS |
| ultra | 330 FPS | 339 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 358 FPS | 337 FPS |
| medium | 308 FPS | 303 FPS |
| high | 285 FPS | 282 FPS |
| ultra | 220 FPS | 226 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 and TITAN RTX

GeForce RTX 4060
GeForce RTX 4060
The GeForce RTX 4060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1830 MHz to 2460 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,548 points. Launch price was $299.

TITAN RTX
TITAN RTX
The TITAN RTX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 18 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1350 MHz to 1770 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 280W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,095 points. Launch price was $2,499.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 4060 scores 19,548 and the TITAN RTX reaches 20,095 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 4060 is built on Ada Lovelace while the TITAN RTX uses Turing, both on 5 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 4,608 (TITAN RTX). Raw compute: 15.11 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 16.31 TFLOPS (TITAN RTX). Boost clocks: 2460 MHz vs 1770 MHz. Ray tracing: 24 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 72 (TITAN RTX) with 96 Tensor cores vs 576.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 19,548 | 20,095+3% |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Turing |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 3072 | 4608+50% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 15.11 TFLOPS | 16.31 TFLOPS+8% |
| Boost Clock | 2460 MHz+39% | 1770 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 96+100% |
| TMUs | 96 | 288+200% |
| L1 Cache | 3 MB | 4.5 MB+50% |
| L2 Cache | 24 MB+300% | 6 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 24 | 72+200% |
| Tensor Cores | 96 | 576+500% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The TITAN RTX lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The TITAN RTX supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 4060 is capped at DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4060 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the TITAN RTX has 24 GB. The TITAN RTX offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 272 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 672 GB/s (TITAN RTX) — a 147.1% advantage for the TITAN RTX. Bus width: 128-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 24 MB (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 6 MB (TITAN RTX) — the GeForce RTX 4060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 24 GB+200% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 272 GB/s | 672 GB/s+147% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 384-bit+200% |
| L2 Cache | 24 MB+300% | 6 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 12 Ultimate (TITAN RTX). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4060) vs NVENC (7th Gen) (TITAN RTX). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs NVDEC (4th Gen). Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (TITAN RTX).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 8th gen | NVENC (7th Gen) |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | NVDEC (4th Gen) |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 draws 115W versus the TITAN RTX's 280W — a 83.5% difference. The GeForce RTX 4060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 650W (TITAN RTX). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 240mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 73°C vs 80.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 115W-59% | 280W |
| Recommended PSU | 550W-15% | 650W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | 240mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 116mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 73°C-9% | 80 |
| Perf/Watt | 170.0+137% | 71.8 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4060 launched at $299 MSRP, while the TITAN RTX launched at $2499. The GeForce RTX 4060 costs 88% less ($2200 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 65.4 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 8.0 (TITAN RTX) — the GeForce RTX 4060 offers 717.5% better value. The GeForce RTX 4060 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2018).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $299-88% | $2499 |
| Performance per Dollar | 65.4+718% | 8.0 |
| Codename | AD107 | TU102 |
| Release | May 18 2023 | December 18 2018 |
| Ranking | #84 | #91 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












