
GeForce RTX 4060
Popular choices:

Tesla T10
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4060
2023Why buy it
- ✅+55.7% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $1,701 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 941.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 6.3 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Tesla T10
Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (12,558 vs 19,548).
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌568.9% HIGHER MSRP$2,000 MSRPvs$299 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.3 vs 65.4 G3D/$ ($2,000 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 4060
2023Tesla T10
Why buy it
- ✅+55.7% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $1,701 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 941.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 6.3 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (12,558 vs 19,548).
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌568.9% HIGHER MSRP$2,000 MSRPvs$299 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.3 vs 65.4 G3D/$ ($2,000 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4060 better than Tesla T10?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Tesla T10 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | Tesla T10 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 167 FPS | 155 FPS |
| medium | 152 FPS | 137 FPS |
| high | 134 FPS | 111 FPS |
| ultra | 115 FPS | 70 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 137 FPS | 127 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 106 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 80 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 51 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 86 FPS | 49 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 43 FPS |
| high | 62 FPS | 30 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 25 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | Tesla T10 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 392 FPS | 294 FPS |
| medium | 334 FPS | 247 FPS |
| high | 268 FPS | 171 FPS |
| ultra | 211 FPS | 125 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 240 FPS | 176 FPS |
| medium | 209 FPS | 136 FPS |
| high | 169 FPS | 103 FPS |
| ultra | 137 FPS | 76 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 77 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 61 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 63 FPS | 36 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | Tesla T10 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 812 FPS | 565 FPS |
| medium | 642 FPS | 452 FPS |
| high | 551 FPS | 377 FPS |
| ultra | 440 FPS | 283 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 424 FPS |
| medium | 443 FPS | 339 FPS |
| high | 379 FPS | 283 FPS |
| ultra | 329 FPS | 212 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 365 FPS | 283 FPS |
| medium | 297 FPS | 226 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 188 FPS |
| ultra | 186 FPS | 141 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | Tesla T10 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 746 FPS | 334 FPS |
| medium | 613 FPS | 293 FPS |
| high | 536 FPS | 250 FPS |
| ultra | 440 FPS | 200 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 594 FPS | 254 FPS |
| medium | 486 FPS | 228 FPS |
| high | 421 FPS | 196 FPS |
| ultra | 330 FPS | 154 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 358 FPS | 150 FPS |
| medium | 308 FPS | 129 FPS |
| high | 285 FPS | 108 FPS |
| ultra | 220 FPS | 84 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 and Tesla T10

GeForce RTX 4060
GeForce RTX 4060
The GeForce RTX 4060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1830 MHz to 2460 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,548 points. Launch price was $299.

Tesla T10
Tesla T10
The Tesla T10 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in sem dados. It features the Turing architecture. The boost clock speed is 1560 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 260W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,558 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 scores 19,548 versus the Tesla T10's 12,558 — the GeForce RTX 4060 leads by 55.7%. The GeForce RTX 4060 is built on Ada Lovelace while the Tesla T10 uses Turing, both on 5 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 4,608 (Tesla T10). Raw compute: 15.11 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 14.38 TFLOPS (Tesla T10). Boost clocks: 2460 MHz vs 1560 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Tesla T10 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 19,548+56% | 12,558 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Turing |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 3072 | 4608+50% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 15.11 TFLOPS+5% | 14.38 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2460 MHz+58% | 1560 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 96+100% |
| TMUs | 96 | 288+200% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Tesla T10 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Tesla T10 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Tesla T10 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Tesla T10 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 12.2 (Tesla T10). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Tesla T10 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 7th Gen NVENC (Tesla T10). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Tesla T10).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Tesla T10 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 8th gen | 7th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 draws 115W versus the Tesla T10's 260W — a 77.3% difference. The GeForce RTX 4060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 500W (Tesla T10). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 240mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 73°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Tesla T10 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 115W-56% | 260W |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 500W-9% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 240mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 73°C-14% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 170.0+252% | 48.3 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4060 launched at $299 MSRP, while the Tesla T10 launched at $2000. The GeForce RTX 4060 costs 85% less ($1701 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 65.4 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 6.3 (Tesla T10) — the GeForce RTX 4060 offers 938.1% better value.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Tesla T10 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $299-85% | $2000 |
| Performance per Dollar | 65.4+938% | 6.3 |
| Codename | AD107 | TU102 |
| Release | May 18 2023 | sem dados |
| Ranking | #84 | #213 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












