
GeForce RTX 4060
Popular choices:

Tesla M60
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4060
2023Why buy it
- ✅+179.2% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $2,701 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $3,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 2701.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 2.3 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $3,000 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Tesla M60
2015Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (7,002 vs 19,548).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌903.3% HIGHER MSRP$3,000 MSRPvs$299 MSRP
GeForce RTX 4060
2023Tesla M60
2015Why buy it
- ✅+179.2% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $2,701 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $3,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 2701.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 2.3 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $3,000 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (7,002 vs 19,548).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌903.3% HIGHER MSRP$3,000 MSRPvs$299 MSRP
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4060 better than Tesla M60?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Tesla M60 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | Tesla M60 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 167 FPS | 104 FPS |
| medium | 152 FPS | 90 FPS |
| high | 134 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 115 FPS | 44 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 137 FPS | 91 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 80 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 33 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 86 FPS | 29 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 27 FPS |
| high | 62 FPS | 18 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 16 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | Tesla M60 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 392 FPS | 173 FPS |
| medium | 334 FPS | 136 FPS |
| high | 268 FPS | 105 FPS |
| ultra | 211 FPS | 84 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 240 FPS | 125 FPS |
| medium | 209 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 169 FPS | 81 FPS |
| ultra | 137 FPS | 62 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 68 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 52 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 63 FPS | 32 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | Tesla M60 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 812 FPS | 315 FPS |
| medium | 642 FPS | 252 FPS |
| high | 551 FPS | 210 FPS |
| ultra | 440 FPS | 158 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 236 FPS |
| medium | 443 FPS | 189 FPS |
| high | 379 FPS | 158 FPS |
| ultra | 329 FPS | 118 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 365 FPS | 158 FPS |
| medium | 297 FPS | 126 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 105 FPS |
| ultra | 186 FPS | 79 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | Tesla M60 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 746 FPS | 182 FPS |
| medium | 613 FPS | 148 FPS |
| high | 536 FPS | 133 FPS |
| ultra | 440 FPS | 103 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 594 FPS | 132 FPS |
| medium | 486 FPS | 110 FPS |
| high | 421 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 330 FPS | 77 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 358 FPS | 77 FPS |
| medium | 308 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 285 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 220 FPS | 36 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 and Tesla M60

GeForce RTX 4060
GeForce RTX 4060
The GeForce RTX 4060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1830 MHz to 2460 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,548 points. Launch price was $299.

Tesla M60
Tesla M60
The Tesla M60 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,002 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 scores 19,548 versus the Tesla M60's 7,002 — the GeForce RTX 4060 leads by 179.2%. The GeForce RTX 4060 is built on Ada Lovelace while the Tesla M60 uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 5 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 2,048 (Tesla M60). Raw compute: 15.11 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 4.825 TFLOPS ×2 (Tesla M60). Boost clocks: 2460 MHz vs 1178 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Tesla M60 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 19,548+179% | 7,002 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 3072+50% | 2048 ×2 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 15.11 TFLOPS+213% | 4.825 TFLOPS ×2 |
| Boost Clock | 2460 MHz+109% | 1178 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 64 ×2+33% |
| TMUs | 96 | 128 ×2+33% |
| L1 Cache | 3 MB+300% | 0.75 MB |
| L2 Cache | 24 MB+1100% | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Tesla M60 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Tesla M60 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Tesla M60 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4060 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Tesla M60 has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 4060 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 24 MB (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 2 MB (Tesla M60) — the GeForce RTX 4060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Tesla M60 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 24 MB+1100% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 12.1 (Tesla M60). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Tesla M60 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4060) vs NVENC 2.0 (2x) (Tesla M60). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs PureVideo HD VP6 (2x). Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs MPEG-2,H.264 (Tesla M60).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Tesla M60 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 8th gen | NVENC 2.0 (2x) |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | PureVideo HD VP6 (2x) |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 draws 115W versus the Tesla M60's 300W — a 89.2% difference. The GeForce RTX 4060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 350W (Tesla M60). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 240mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Tesla M60 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 115W-62% | 300W |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 350W-36% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 240mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 73°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 170.0+630% | 23.3 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4060 launched at $299 MSRP, while the Tesla M60 launched at $3000. The GeForce RTX 4060 costs 90% less ($2701 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 65.4 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 2.3 (Tesla M60) — the GeForce RTX 4060 offers 2743.5% better value. The GeForce RTX 4060 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Tesla M60 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $299-90% | $3000 |
| Performance per Dollar | 65.4+2743% | 2.3 |
| Codename | AD107 | GM204 |
| Release | May 18 2023 | August 30 2015 |
| Ranking | #84 | #355 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












