
GeForce RTX 4060
Popular choices:

RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4060
2023Why buy it
- ✅+36.1% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $550 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $849 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 286.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 16.9 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $849 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (96 vs 136), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌64.3% higher power demand at 115W vs 70W.
- ❌43.7% longer card at 240mm vs 167mm.
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell
2025Why buy it
- ✅3.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅41.7% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (136 vs 96).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 115W, a 45W reduction.
- ✅Measures 167mm instead of 240mm, a 73mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (14,363 vs 19,548).
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌183.9% HIGHER MSRP$849 MSRPvs$299 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 16.9 vs 65.4 G3D/$ ($849 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 4060
2023RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell
2025Why buy it
- ✅+36.1% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $550 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $849 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 286.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 16.9 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $849 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅3.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅41.7% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (136 vs 96).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 115W, a 45W reduction.
- ✅Measures 167mm instead of 240mm, a 73mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (96 vs 136), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌64.3% higher power demand at 115W vs 70W.
- ❌43.7% longer card at 240mm vs 167mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (14,363 vs 19,548).
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌183.9% HIGHER MSRP$849 MSRPvs$299 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 16.9 vs 65.4 G3D/$ ($849 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4060 better than RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell make more sense than GeForce RTX 4060?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 167 FPS | 181 FPS |
| medium | 152 FPS | 160 FPS |
| high | 134 FPS | 135 FPS |
| ultra | 115 FPS | 99 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 137 FPS | 158 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 133 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 72 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 86 FPS | 80 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 68 FPS |
| high | 62 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 44 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 392 FPS | 294 FPS |
| medium | 334 FPS | 255 FPS |
| high | 268 FPS | 211 FPS |
| ultra | 211 FPS | 170 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 240 FPS | 212 FPS |
| medium | 209 FPS | 181 FPS |
| high | 169 FPS | 152 FPS |
| ultra | 137 FPS | 121 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 99 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 83 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 70 FPS |
| ultra | 63 FPS | 52 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 812 FPS | 646 FPS |
| medium | 642 FPS | 517 FPS |
| high | 551 FPS | 431 FPS |
| ultra | 440 FPS | 323 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 485 FPS |
| medium | 443 FPS | 388 FPS |
| high | 379 FPS | 323 FPS |
| ultra | 329 FPS | 242 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 365 FPS | 323 FPS |
| medium | 297 FPS | 259 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 215 FPS |
| ultra | 186 FPS | 162 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 746 FPS | 290 FPS |
| medium | 613 FPS | 247 FPS |
| high | 536 FPS | 203 FPS |
| ultra | 440 FPS | 177 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 594 FPS | 229 FPS |
| medium | 486 FPS | 198 FPS |
| high | 421 FPS | 165 FPS |
| ultra | 330 FPS | 139 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 358 FPS | 139 FPS |
| medium | 308 FPS | 116 FPS |
| high | 285 FPS | 93 FPS |
| ultra | 220 FPS | 76 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 and RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell

GeForce RTX 4060
GeForce RTX 4060
The GeForce RTX 4060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1830 MHz to 2460 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,548 points. Launch price was $299.

RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell
The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 11 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 982 MHz to 1957 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,363 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 scores 19,548 versus the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell's 14,363 — the GeForce RTX 4060 leads by 36.1%. The GeForce RTX 4060 is built on Ada Lovelace while the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell uses Blackwell 2.0, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 3,072 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 4,352 (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell). Raw compute: 15.11 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 17.03 TFLOPS (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell). Boost clocks: 2460 MHz vs 1957 MHz. Ray tracing: 24 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 34 (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell) with 96 Tensor cores vs 136.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 19,548+36% | 14,363 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Blackwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 3072 | 4352+42% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 15.11 TFLOPS | 17.03 TFLOPS+13% |
| Boost Clock | 2460 MHz+26% | 1957 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 64+33% |
| TMUs | 96 | 136+42% |
| L1 Cache | 3 MB | 4.3 MB+43% |
| L2 Cache | 24 MB | 32 MB+33% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 24 | 34+42% |
| Tensor Cores | 96 | 136+42% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 4060 is capped at DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4060 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell has 16 GB. The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 24 MB (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 32 MB (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell) — the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 16 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 24 MB | 32 MB+33% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 12.0 (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 9th Gen NVENC (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs 6th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 8th gen | 9th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | 6th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 draws 115W versus the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell's 70W — a 48.6% difference. The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 500W (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 240mm vs 167mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 73°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 115W | 70W-39% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 500W-9% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 240mm | 167mm |
| Height | 111mm | 68mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 73°C | 70°C-4% |
| Perf/Watt | 170.0 | 205.2+21% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4060 launched at $299 MSRP, while the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell launched at $849. The GeForce RTX 4060 costs 64.8% less ($550 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 65.4 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 16.9 (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell) — the GeForce RTX 4060 offers 287% better value. The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2023).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $299-65% | $849 |
| Performance per Dollar | 65.4+287% | 16.9 |
| Codename | AD107 | GB206 |
| Release | May 18 2023 | August 11 2025 |
| Ranking | #84 | #165 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












