
GeForce RTX 4060
Popular choices:

RTX A4500 Mobile
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4060
2023Why buy it
- ✅+17.7% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 115W instead of 140W, a 25W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX A4500 Mobile across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (96 vs 184), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
RTX A4500 Mobile
2022Why buy it
- ✅10.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅91.7% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (184 vs 96).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (16,613 vs 19,548).
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 65.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ❌21.7% higher power demand at 140W vs 115W.
GeForce RTX 4060
2023RTX A4500 Mobile
2022Why buy it
- ✅+17.7% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 115W instead of 140W, a 25W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅10.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅91.7% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (184 vs 96).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX A4500 Mobile across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (96 vs 184), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (16,613 vs 19,548).
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 65.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ❌21.7% higher power demand at 140W vs 115W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4060 better than RTX A4500 Mobile?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is RTX A4500 Mobile still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | RTX A4500 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 167 FPS | 166 FPS |
| medium | 152 FPS | 148 FPS |
| high | 134 FPS | 125 FPS |
| ultra | 115 FPS | 90 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 137 FPS | 146 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 124 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 66 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 86 FPS | 70 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 62 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 38 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | RTX A4500 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 392 FPS | 354 FPS |
| medium | 334 FPS | 306 FPS |
| high | 268 FPS | 251 FPS |
| ultra | 211 FPS | 209 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 240 FPS | 250 FPS |
| medium | 209 FPS | 206 FPS |
| high | 169 FPS | 179 FPS |
| ultra | 137 FPS | 145 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 127 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 108 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 94 FPS |
| ultra | 63 FPS | 72 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | RTX A4500 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 812 FPS | 748 FPS |
| medium | 642 FPS | 598 FPS |
| high | 551 FPS | 498 FPS |
| ultra | 440 FPS | 374 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 561 FPS |
| medium | 443 FPS | 449 FPS |
| high | 379 FPS | 374 FPS |
| ultra | 329 FPS | 280 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 365 FPS | 374 FPS |
| medium | 297 FPS | 299 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 249 FPS |
| ultra | 186 FPS | 187 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | RTX A4500 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 746 FPS | 282 FPS |
| medium | 613 FPS | 246 FPS |
| high | 536 FPS | 201 FPS |
| ultra | 440 FPS | 173 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 594 FPS | 216 FPS |
| medium | 486 FPS | 193 FPS |
| high | 421 FPS | 159 FPS |
| ultra | 330 FPS | 133 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 358 FPS | 131 FPS |
| medium | 308 FPS | 112 FPS |
| high | 285 FPS | 90 FPS |
| ultra | 220 FPS | 72 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 and RTX A4500 Mobile

GeForce RTX 4060
GeForce RTX 4060
The GeForce RTX 4060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1830 MHz to 2460 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,548 points. Launch price was $299.

RTX A4500 Mobile
RTX A4500 Mobile
The RTX A4500 Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 930 MHz to 1500 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 140W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,613 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 scores 19,548 versus the RTX A4500 Mobile's 16,613 — the GeForce RTX 4060 leads by 17.7%. The GeForce RTX 4060 is built on Ada Lovelace while the RTX A4500 Mobile uses Ampere, both on 5 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 5,888 (RTX A4500 Mobile). Raw compute: 15.11 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 17.66 TFLOPS (RTX A4500 Mobile). Boost clocks: 2460 MHz vs 1500 MHz. Ray tracing: 24 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 46 (RTX A4500 Mobile) with 96 Tensor cores vs 184.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | RTX A4500 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 19,548+18% | 16,613 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ampere |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 3072 | 5888+92% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 15.11 TFLOPS | 17.66 TFLOPS+17% |
| Boost Clock | 2460 MHz+64% | 1500 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 96+100% |
| TMUs | 96 | 184+92% |
| L1 Cache | 3 MB | 5.8 MB+93% |
| L2 Cache | 24 MB+500% | 4 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 24 | 46+92% |
| Tensor Cores | 96 | 184+92% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The RTX A4500 Mobile lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The RTX A4500 Mobile supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 4060 is capped at DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | RTX A4500 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4060 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the RTX A4500 Mobile has 16 GB. The RTX A4500 Mobile offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 24 MB (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 4 MB (RTX A4500 Mobile) — the GeForce RTX 4060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | RTX A4500 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 16 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 24 MB+500% | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 12.2 (RTX A4500 Mobile). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 1.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | RTX A4500 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+300% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 7th Gen NVENC (RTX A4500 Mobile). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (RTX A4500 Mobile).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | RTX A4500 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 8th gen | 7th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 draws 115W versus the RTX A4500 Mobile's 140W — a 19.6% difference. The GeForce RTX 4060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 650W (RTX A4500 Mobile). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 240mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 73°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | RTX A4500 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 115W-18% | 140W |
| Recommended PSU | 550W-15% | 650W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 240mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 73°C-9% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 170.0+43% | 118.7 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4060 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2022).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | RTX A4500 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $299 | — |
| Codename | AD107 | GA104 |
| Release | May 18 2023 | March 22 2022 |
| Ranking | #84 | #119 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












