GeForce RTX 4060 vs RTX 6000 Ada Generation

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 4060

2023Core: 1830 MHzBoost: 2460 MHz

Popular choices:

VS
NVIDIA

RTX 6000 Ada Generation

2022Core: 915 MHzBoost: 2505 MHz

Popular choices:

RTX 4060

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 4060

2023

Why buy it

  • Costs $6,500 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $6,799 MSRP).
  • Delivers 1462.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 4.2 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $6,799 MSRP).
  • Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
  • More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
  • Draws 115W instead of 300W, a 185W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than RTX 6000 Ada Generation across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 48 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (96 vs 568), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.

RTX 6000 Ada Generation

2022

Why buy it

  • 64.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 491.7% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (568 vs 96).
  • 500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (48 GB vs 8 GB).

Trade-offs

  • No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
  • Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
  • 2173.9% HIGHER MSRP
    $6,799 MSRPvs$299 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 4.2 vs 65.4 G3D/$ ($6,799 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
  • 160.9% higher power demand at 300W vs 115W.

Quick Answers

So, is RTX 6000 Ada Generation better than GeForce RTX 4060?
Yes. RTX 6000 Ada Generation is the better GPU overall here. You are getting 64.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data, 45.6% higher PassMark G3D performance, 568 vs 96 Tensor cores, and 48 GB vs 8 GB of VRAM. It also comes from 2022 instead of 2023, which helps its case as the more complete modern gaming card.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce RTX 4060 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2023 generation instead of 2022 and better upscaling support with DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack and better frame-generation support with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
RTX 6000 Ada Generation is about 2173.9% more expensive on MSRP at $6,799 MSRP versus $299 MSRP, and you are getting 64.9% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and 45.6% higher G3D Mark. GeForce RTX 4060 still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium. If you are comfortable paying the premium for the stronger gaming result, RTX 6000 Ada Generation is the one to buy. If staying closer to budget matters more, GeForce RTX 4060 still makes more sense on price alone and remains capable enough for modern gaming.
When does GeForce RTX 4060 make more sense than RTX 6000 Ada Generation?
Yes. GeForce RTX 4060 is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is very strong for 1080p, good for 1440p, and more limited at 4K. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (115W vs 300W), future-proofing, and staying closer to $299 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of RTX 6000 Ada Generation. The trade-off is that RTX 6000 Ada Generation currently gives you 45.6% higher G3D Mark and 64.9% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. GeForce RTX 4060 still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetGeForce RTX 4060RTX 6000 Ada Generation
1080p
low167 FPS223 FPS
medium152 FPS195 FPS
high134 FPS161 FPS
ultra115 FPS113 FPS
1440p
low137 FPS200 FPS
medium114 FPS166 FPS
high99 FPS121 FPS
ultra90 FPS84 FPS
4K
low86 FPS106 FPS
medium74 FPS88 FPS
high62 FPS60 FPS
ultra55 FPS52 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetGeForce RTX 4060RTX 6000 Ada Generation
1080p
low392 FPS713 FPS
medium334 FPS578 FPS
high268 FPS438 FPS
ultra211 FPS368 FPS
1440p
low240 FPS607 FPS
medium209 FPS507 FPS
high169 FPS393 FPS
ultra137 FPS306 FPS
4K
low119 FPS325 FPS
medium98 FPS269 FPS
high82 FPS240 FPS
ultra63 FPS194 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetGeForce RTX 4060RTX 6000 Ada Generation
1080p
low812 FPS921 FPS
medium642 FPS755 FPS
high551 FPS683 FPS
ultra440 FPS589 FPS
1440p
low535 FPS714 FPS
medium443 FPS583 FPS
high379 FPS515 FPS
ultra329 FPS439 FPS
4K
low365 FPS489 FPS
medium297 FPS404 FPS
high234 FPS349 FPS
ultra186 FPS288 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetGeForce RTX 4060RTX 6000 Ada Generation
1080p
low746 FPS389 FPS
medium613 FPS340 FPS
high536 FPS296 FPS
ultra440 FPS246 FPS
1440p
low594 FPS283 FPS
medium486 FPS253 FPS
high421 FPS217 FPS
ultra330 FPS180 FPS
4K
low358 FPS193 FPS
medium308 FPS165 FPS
high285 FPS128 FPS
ultra220 FPS102 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 and RTX 6000 Ada Generation

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 4060

The GeForce RTX 4060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1830 MHz to 2460 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,548 points. Launch price was $299.

NVIDIA

RTX 6000 Ada Generation

The RTX 6000 Ada Generation is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 3 2022. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 915 MHz to 2505 MHz. It has 18176 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 142 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 28,454 points. Launch price was $6,799.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 scores 19,548 versus the RTX 6000 Ada Generation's 28,454 — the RTX 6000 Ada Generation leads by 45.6%. The GeForce RTX 4060 is built on Ada Lovelace while the RTX 6000 Ada Generation uses Ada Lovelace, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 3,072 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 18,176 (RTX 6000 Ada Generation). Raw compute: 15.11 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 91.06 TFLOPS (RTX 6000 Ada Generation). Boost clocks: 2460 MHz vs 2505 MHz. Ray tracing: 24 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 142 (RTX 6000 Ada Generation) with 96 Tensor cores vs 568.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060RTX 6000 Ada Generation
G3D Mark Score
19,548
28,454+46%
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
Ada Lovelace
Process Node
5 nm
5 nm
Shading Units
3072
18176+492%
Compute (TFLOPS)
15.11 TFLOPS
91.06 TFLOPS+503%
Boost Clock
2460 MHz
2505 MHz+2%
ROPs
48
192+300%
TMUs
96
568+492%
L1 Cache
3 MB
17.8 MB+493%
L2 Cache
24 MB
96 MB+300%
Ray Tracing Cores
24
142+492%
Tensor Cores
96
568+492%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The RTX 6000 Ada Generation lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The RTX 6000 Ada Generation supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 4060 is capped at DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060RTX 6000 Ada Generation
Upscaling Tech
DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
Yes (DLSS 3.5)
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 4060 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the RTX 6000 Ada Generation has 48 GB. The RTX 6000 Ada Generation offers 500% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 272 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 960 GB/s (RTX 6000 Ada Generation) — a 252.9% advantage for the RTX 6000 Ada Generation. Bus width: 128-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 24 MB (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 96 MB (RTX 6000 Ada Generation) — the RTX 6000 Ada Generation has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060RTX 6000 Ada Generation
VRAM Capacity
8 GB
48 GB+500%
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth
272 GB/s
960 GB/s+253%
Bus Width
128-bit
384-bit+200%
L2 Cache
24 MB
96 MB+300%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 12.2 (RTX 6000 Ada Generation). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060RTX 6000 Ada Generation
DirectX
12 Ultimate
12.2+2%
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4060) vs NVENC 8th Gen (RTX 6000 Ada Generation). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs NVDEC 5th Gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs AV1,HEVC,H.264,VP9 (RTX 6000 Ada Generation).

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060RTX 6000 Ada Generation
Encoder
NVENC 8th gen
NVENC 8th Gen
Decoder
NVDEC 5th gen
NVDEC 5th Gen
Codecs
H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1
AV1,HEVC,H.264,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4060 draws 115W versus the RTX 6000 Ada Generation's 300W — a 89.2% difference. The GeForce RTX 4060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 500W (RTX 6000 Ada Generation). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 16-pin. Card length: 240mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 73°C vs 80°C.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060RTX 6000 Ada Generation
TDP
115W-62%
300W
Recommended PSU
550W
500W-9%
Power Connector
8-pin
16-pin
Length
240mm
267mm
Height
111mm
112mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
73°C-9%
80°C
Perf/Watt
170.0+79%
94.8
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 4060 launched at $299 MSRP, while the RTX 6000 Ada Generation launched at $6799. The GeForce RTX 4060 costs 95.6% less ($6500 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 65.4 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 4.2 (RTX 6000 Ada Generation) — the GeForce RTX 4060 offers 1457.1% better value. The GeForce RTX 4060 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2022).

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060RTX 6000 Ada Generation
MSRP
$299-96%
$6799
Performance per Dollar
65.4+1457%
4.2
Codename
AD107
AD102
Release
May 18 2023
December 3 2022
Ranking
#84
#24