
GeForce RTX 4060
Popular choices:

RTX 6000 Ada Generation
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4060
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $6,500 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $6,799 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1462.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 4.2 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $6,799 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 115W instead of 300W, a 185W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX 6000 Ada Generation across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 48 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (96 vs 568), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
RTX 6000 Ada Generation
2022Why buy it
- ✅64.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅491.7% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (568 vs 96).
- ✅500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (48 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌2173.9% HIGHER MSRP$6,799 MSRPvs$299 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 4.2 vs 65.4 G3D/$ ($6,799 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ❌160.9% higher power demand at 300W vs 115W.
GeForce RTX 4060
2023RTX 6000 Ada Generation
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $6,500 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $6,799 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1462.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 4.2 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $6,799 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 115W instead of 300W, a 185W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅64.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅491.7% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (568 vs 96).
- ✅500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (48 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX 6000 Ada Generation across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 48 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (96 vs 568), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌2173.9% HIGHER MSRP$6,799 MSRPvs$299 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 4.2 vs 65.4 G3D/$ ($6,799 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ❌160.9% higher power demand at 300W vs 115W.
Quick Answers
So, is RTX 6000 Ada Generation better than GeForce RTX 4060?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce RTX 4060 make more sense than RTX 6000 Ada Generation?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | RTX 6000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 167 FPS | 223 FPS |
| medium | 152 FPS | 195 FPS |
| high | 134 FPS | 161 FPS |
| ultra | 115 FPS | 113 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 137 FPS | 200 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 166 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 121 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 84 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 86 FPS | 106 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 88 FPS |
| high | 62 FPS | 60 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 52 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | RTX 6000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 392 FPS | 713 FPS |
| medium | 334 FPS | 578 FPS |
| high | 268 FPS | 438 FPS |
| ultra | 211 FPS | 368 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 240 FPS | 607 FPS |
| medium | 209 FPS | 507 FPS |
| high | 169 FPS | 393 FPS |
| ultra | 137 FPS | 306 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 325 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 269 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 240 FPS |
| ultra | 63 FPS | 194 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | RTX 6000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 812 FPS | 921 FPS |
| medium | 642 FPS | 755 FPS |
| high | 551 FPS | 683 FPS |
| ultra | 440 FPS | 589 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 714 FPS |
| medium | 443 FPS | 583 FPS |
| high | 379 FPS | 515 FPS |
| ultra | 329 FPS | 439 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 365 FPS | 489 FPS |
| medium | 297 FPS | 404 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 349 FPS |
| ultra | 186 FPS | 288 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | RTX 6000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 746 FPS | 389 FPS |
| medium | 613 FPS | 340 FPS |
| high | 536 FPS | 296 FPS |
| ultra | 440 FPS | 246 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 594 FPS | 283 FPS |
| medium | 486 FPS | 253 FPS |
| high | 421 FPS | 217 FPS |
| ultra | 330 FPS | 180 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 358 FPS | 193 FPS |
| medium | 308 FPS | 165 FPS |
| high | 285 FPS | 128 FPS |
| ultra | 220 FPS | 102 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 and RTX 6000 Ada Generation

GeForce RTX 4060
GeForce RTX 4060
The GeForce RTX 4060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1830 MHz to 2460 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,548 points. Launch price was $299.

RTX 6000 Ada Generation
RTX 6000 Ada Generation
The RTX 6000 Ada Generation is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 3 2022. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 915 MHz to 2505 MHz. It has 18176 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 142 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 28,454 points. Launch price was $6,799.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 scores 19,548 versus the RTX 6000 Ada Generation's 28,454 — the RTX 6000 Ada Generation leads by 45.6%. The GeForce RTX 4060 is built on Ada Lovelace while the RTX 6000 Ada Generation uses Ada Lovelace, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 3,072 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 18,176 (RTX 6000 Ada Generation). Raw compute: 15.11 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 91.06 TFLOPS (RTX 6000 Ada Generation). Boost clocks: 2460 MHz vs 2505 MHz. Ray tracing: 24 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 142 (RTX 6000 Ada Generation) with 96 Tensor cores vs 568.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | RTX 6000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 19,548 | 28,454+46% |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 3072 | 18176+492% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 15.11 TFLOPS | 91.06 TFLOPS+503% |
| Boost Clock | 2460 MHz | 2505 MHz+2% |
| ROPs | 48 | 192+300% |
| TMUs | 96 | 568+492% |
| L1 Cache | 3 MB | 17.8 MB+493% |
| L2 Cache | 24 MB | 96 MB+300% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 24 | 142+492% |
| Tensor Cores | 96 | 568+492% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The RTX 6000 Ada Generation lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The RTX 6000 Ada Generation supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 4060 is capped at DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | RTX 6000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4060 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the RTX 6000 Ada Generation has 48 GB. The RTX 6000 Ada Generation offers 500% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 272 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 960 GB/s (RTX 6000 Ada Generation) — a 252.9% advantage for the RTX 6000 Ada Generation. Bus width: 128-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 24 MB (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 96 MB (RTX 6000 Ada Generation) — the RTX 6000 Ada Generation has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | RTX 6000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 48 GB+500% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 272 GB/s | 960 GB/s+253% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 384-bit+200% |
| L2 Cache | 24 MB | 96 MB+300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 12.2 (RTX 6000 Ada Generation). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | RTX 6000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4060) vs NVENC 8th Gen (RTX 6000 Ada Generation). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs NVDEC 5th Gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs AV1,HEVC,H.264,VP9 (RTX 6000 Ada Generation).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | RTX 6000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 8th gen | NVENC 8th Gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | NVDEC 5th Gen |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 | AV1,HEVC,H.264,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 draws 115W versus the RTX 6000 Ada Generation's 300W — a 89.2% difference. The GeForce RTX 4060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 500W (RTX 6000 Ada Generation). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 16-pin. Card length: 240mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 73°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | RTX 6000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 115W-62% | 300W |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 500W-9% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 16-pin |
| Length | 240mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 73°C-9% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 170.0+79% | 94.8 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4060 launched at $299 MSRP, while the RTX 6000 Ada Generation launched at $6799. The GeForce RTX 4060 costs 95.6% less ($6500 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 65.4 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 4.2 (RTX 6000 Ada Generation) — the GeForce RTX 4060 offers 1457.1% better value. The GeForce RTX 4060 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2022).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | RTX 6000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $299-96% | $6799 |
| Performance per Dollar | 65.4+1457% | 4.2 |
| Codename | AD107 | AD102 |
| Release | May 18 2023 | December 3 2022 |
| Ranking | #84 | #24 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












