G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 4060

2023

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (96 vs 232), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.

RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile

2023

Why buy it

✅25.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅141.7% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (232 vs 96).
✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 65.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $299 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 4060

2023

RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile

2023

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Why buy it

✅25.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅141.7% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (232 vs 96).
✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (96 vs 232), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 65.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $299 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile better than GeForce RTX 4060?

Yes. RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile is the better GPU overall here. You are getting 25.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data, 13.4% higher PassMark G3D performance, 232 vs 96 Tensor cores, and 12 GB vs 8 GB of VRAM.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 4060 is the safer long-term GPU choice because it gives you the stronger overall hardware and feature outlook for modern games.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile is priced in an unclear MSRP range at an unclear MSRP versus $299 MSRP, and you are getting 25.5% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and 13.4% higher G3D Mark. GeForce RTX 4060 still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium. If you are comfortable paying the premium for the stronger gaming result, RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile is the one to buy. If staying closer to budget matters more, GeForce RTX 4060 still makes more sense on price alone and remains capable enough for modern gaming.

When does GeForce RTX 4060 make more sense than RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile?

Yes. GeForce RTX 4060 is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is very strong for 1080p, good for 1440p, and more limited at 4K. It makes more sense if your priority is future-proofing and staying closer to $299 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile. The trade-off is that RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile currently gives you 13.4% higher G3D Mark and 25.5% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. GeForce RTX 4060 still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 4060 Benchmark Check

RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060	RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile
1080p
low	167 FPS	163 FPS
medium	152 FPS	150 FPS
high	134 FPS	131 FPS
ultra	115 FPS	115 FPS
1440p
low	137 FPS	138 FPS
medium	114 FPS	115 FPS
high	99 FPS	98 FPS
ultra	90 FPS	87 FPS
4K
low	86 FPS	80 FPS
medium	74 FPS	68 FPS
high	62 FPS	52 FPS
ultra	55 FPS	46 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Open RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060	RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile
1080p
low	392 FPS	422 FPS
medium	334 FPS	365 FPS
high	268 FPS	295 FPS
ultra	211 FPS	259 FPS
1440p
low	240 FPS	326 FPS
medium	209 FPS	272 FPS
high	169 FPS	222 FPS
ultra	137 FPS	186 FPS
4K
low	119 FPS	179 FPS
medium	98 FPS	155 FPS
high	82 FPS	132 FPS
ultra	63 FPS	108 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Open RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060	RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile
1080p
low	812 FPS	870 FPS
medium	642 FPS	712 FPS
high	551 FPS	626 FPS
ultra	440 FPS	499 FPS
1440p
low	535 FPS	691 FPS
medium	443 FPS	561 FPS
high	379 FPS	483 FPS
ultra	329 FPS	374 FPS
4K
low	365 FPS	470 FPS
medium	297 FPS	383 FPS
high	234 FPS	328 FPS
ultra	186 FPS	249 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Open RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060	RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile
1080p
low	746 FPS	459 FPS
medium	613 FPS	408 FPS
high	536 FPS	344 FPS
ultra	440 FPS	302 FPS
1440p
low	594 FPS	381 FPS
medium	486 FPS	340 FPS
high	421 FPS	284 FPS
ultra	330 FPS	244 FPS
4K
low	358 FPS	242 FPS
medium	308 FPS	221 FPS
high	285 FPS	188 FPS
ultra	220 FPS	163 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Open RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 and RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile

GeForce RTX 4060

The GeForce RTX 4060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1830 MHz to 2460 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,548 points. Launch price was $299.

RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile

The RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 21 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1290 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 7424 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 58 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,167 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 scores 19,548 versus the RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile's 22,167 — the RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile leads by 13.4%. The GeForce RTX 4060 is built on Ada Lovelace while the RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile uses Ada Lovelace, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 3,072 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 7,424 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile). Raw compute: 15.11 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 24.72 TFLOPS (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile). Boost clocks: 2460 MHz vs 1665 MHz. Ray tracing: 24 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 58 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile) with 96 Tensor cores vs 232.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060	RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile
G3D Mark Score	19,548	22,167+13%
Architecture	Ada Lovelace	Ada Lovelace
Process Node	5 nm	5 nm
Shading Units	3072	7424+142%
Compute (TFLOPS)	15.11 TFLOPS	24.72 TFLOPS+64%
Boost Clock	2460 MHz+48%	1665 MHz
ROPs	48	80+67%
TMUs	96	232+142%
L1 Cache	3 MB	7.3 MB+143%
L2 Cache	24 MB	48 MB+100%
Ray Tracing Cores	24	58+142%
Tensor Cores	96	232+142%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Both cards support modern Frame Generation technology, allowing them to insert intermediate frames to smooth motion and boost perceived FPS in supported games.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060	RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution
Frame Generation	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation
Ray Reconstruction	Yes (DLSS 3.5)	Yes (DLSS 3.5)
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 4060 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile has 12 GB. The RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 272 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 432 GB/s (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile) — a 58.8% advantage for the RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile. Bus width: 128-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 24 MB (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 48 MB (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile) — the RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060	RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile
VRAM Capacity	8 GB	12 GB+50%
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	272 GB/s	432 GB/s+59%
Bus Width	128-bit	192-bit+50%
L2 Cache	24 MB	48 MB+100%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 12.2 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 1.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060	RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile
DirectX	12 Ultimate	12.2+2%
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4+300%	1

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 8th Gen NVENC (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile).

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060	RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile
Encoder	NVENC 8th gen	8th Gen NVENC
Decoder	NVDEC 5th gen	5th Gen NVDEC
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4060 draws 115W versus the RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile's 110W — a 4.4% difference. The RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 150W (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile). Power connectors: 8-pin vs Mobile. Card length: 240mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 73°C vs 80°C.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060	RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile
TDP	115W	110W-4%
Recommended PSU	550W	150W-73%
Power Connector	8-pin	Mobile
Length	240mm	0mm
Height	111mm	0mm
Slots	2	0-100%
Temp (Load)	73°C-9%	80°C
Perf/Watt	170.0	201.5+19%