
GeForce RTX 4060
Popular choices:

RTX 2000 Ada Generation
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4060
2023Why buy it
- ✅+14% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $326 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $625 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 138.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 27.4 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $625 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌64.3% higher power demand at 115W vs 70W.
- ❌43.7% longer card at 240mm vs 167mm.
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
2024Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 115W, a 45W reduction.
- ✅Measures 167mm instead of 240mm, a 73mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (17,147 vs 19,548).
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌109% HIGHER MSRP$625 MSRPvs$299 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 27.4 vs 65.4 G3D/$ ($625 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 4060
2023RTX 2000 Ada Generation
2024Why buy it
- ✅+14% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $326 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $625 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 138.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 27.4 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $625 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 115W, a 45W reduction.
- ✅Measures 167mm instead of 240mm, a 73mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌64.3% higher power demand at 115W vs 70W.
- ❌43.7% longer card at 240mm vs 167mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (17,147 vs 19,548).
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌109% HIGHER MSRP$625 MSRPvs$299 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 27.4 vs 65.4 G3D/$ ($625 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4060 better than RTX 2000 Ada Generation?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does RTX 2000 Ada Generation make more sense than GeForce RTX 4060?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | RTX 2000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 167 FPS | 199 FPS |
| medium | 152 FPS | 184 FPS |
| high | 134 FPS | 163 FPS |
| ultra | 115 FPS | 144 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 137 FPS | 180 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 155 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 130 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 119 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 86 FPS | 113 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 99 FPS |
| high | 62 FPS | 75 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 68 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | RTX 2000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 392 FPS | 342 FPS |
| medium | 334 FPS | 284 FPS |
| high | 268 FPS | 218 FPS |
| ultra | 211 FPS | 169 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 240 FPS | 208 FPS |
| medium | 209 FPS | 175 FPS |
| high | 169 FPS | 145 FPS |
| ultra | 137 FPS | 115 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 106 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 86 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 72 FPS |
| ultra | 63 FPS | 56 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | RTX 2000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 812 FPS | 772 FPS |
| medium | 642 FPS | 617 FPS |
| high | 551 FPS | 514 FPS |
| ultra | 440 FPS | 386 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 579 FPS |
| medium | 443 FPS | 463 FPS |
| high | 379 FPS | 386 FPS |
| ultra | 329 FPS | 289 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 365 FPS | 386 FPS |
| medium | 297 FPS | 309 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 257 FPS |
| ultra | 186 FPS | 193 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | RTX 2000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 746 FPS | 682 FPS |
| medium | 613 FPS | 589 FPS |
| high | 536 FPS | 489 FPS |
| ultra | 440 FPS | 386 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 594 FPS | 553 FPS |
| medium | 486 FPS | 463 FPS |
| high | 421 FPS | 386 FPS |
| ultra | 330 FPS | 289 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 358 FPS | 339 FPS |
| medium | 308 FPS | 305 FPS |
| high | 285 FPS | 257 FPS |
| ultra | 220 FPS | 193 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 and RTX 2000 Ada Generation

GeForce RTX 4060
GeForce RTX 4060
The GeForce RTX 4060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1830 MHz to 2460 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,548 points. Launch price was $299.

RTX 2000 Ada Generation
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
The RTX 2000 Ada Generation is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 12 2024. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1620 MHz to 2130 MHz. It has 2816 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 22 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 17,147 points. Launch price was $649.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 scores 19,548 versus the RTX 2000 Ada Generation's 17,147 — the GeForce RTX 4060 leads by 14%. The GeForce RTX 4060 is built on Ada Lovelace while the RTX 2000 Ada Generation uses Ada Lovelace, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 3,072 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 2,816 (RTX 2000 Ada Generation). Raw compute: 15.11 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 12 TFLOPS (RTX 2000 Ada Generation). Boost clocks: 2460 MHz vs 2130 MHz. Ray tracing: 24 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 22 (RTX 2000 Ada Generation) with 96 Tensor cores vs 88.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | RTX 2000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 19,548+14% | 17,147 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 3072+9% | 2816 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 15.11 TFLOPS+26% | 12 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2460 MHz+15% | 2130 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 48 |
| TMUs | 96+9% | 88 |
| L1 Cache | 3 MB+7% | 2.8 MB |
| L2 Cache | 24 MB+100% | 12 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 24+9% | 22 |
| Tensor Cores | 96+9% | 88 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The RTX 2000 Ada Generation lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The RTX 2000 Ada Generation supports the newer DLSS 2 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce RTX 4060 is capped at DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | RTX 2000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | DLSS 2 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4060 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the RTX 2000 Ada Generation has 16 GB. The RTX 2000 Ada Generation offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 272 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 256 GB/s (RTX 2000 Ada Generation) — a 6.3% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 24 MB (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 12 MB (RTX 2000 Ada Generation) — the GeForce RTX 4060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | RTX 2000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 16 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 272 GB/s+6% | 256 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 24 MB+100% | 12 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 12.2 (RTX 2000 Ada Generation). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | RTX 2000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 8th Gen NVENC (RTX 2000 Ada Generation). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX 2000 Ada Generation).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | RTX 2000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 8th gen | 8th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 draws 115W versus the RTX 2000 Ada Generation's 70W — a 48.6% difference. The RTX 2000 Ada Generation is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 650W (RTX 2000 Ada Generation). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 240mm vs 167mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 73°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | RTX 2000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 115W | 70W-39% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W-15% | 650W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 240mm | 167mm |
| Height | 111mm | 68mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 73°C-3% | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 170.0 | 245.0+44% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4060 launched at $299 MSRP, while the RTX 2000 Ada Generation launched at $625. The GeForce RTX 4060 costs 52.2% less ($326 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 65.4 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 27.4 (RTX 2000 Ada Generation) — the GeForce RTX 4060 offers 138.7% better value. The RTX 2000 Ada Generation is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2023).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | RTX 2000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $299-52% | $625 |
| Performance per Dollar | 65.4+139% | 27.4 |
| Codename | AD107 | AD107 |
| Release | May 18 2023 | February 12 2024 |
| Ranking | #84 | #107 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












