
GeForce RTX 4060
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 7900M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4060
2023Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023).
- ✅Draws 115W instead of 180W, a 65W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 7900M across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Radeon RX 7900M
2023Why buy it
- ✅44.9% more average FPS across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 65.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ❌56.5% higher power demand at 180W vs 115W.
GeForce RTX 4060
2023Radeon RX 7900M
2023Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023).
- ✅Draws 115W instead of 180W, a 65W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅44.9% more average FPS across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 7900M across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 65.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ❌56.5% higher power demand at 180W vs 115W.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon RX 7900M better than GeForce RTX 4060?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce RTX 4060 make more sense than Radeon RX 7900M?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon RX 7900M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 167 FPS | 223 FPS |
| medium | 152 FPS | 207 FPS |
| high | 134 FPS | 182 FPS |
| ultra | 115 FPS | 166 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 137 FPS | 202 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 171 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 141 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 133 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 86 FPS | 137 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 115 FPS |
| high | 62 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 86 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon RX 7900M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 392 FPS | 576 FPS |
| medium | 334 FPS | 480 FPS |
| high | 268 FPS | 368 FPS |
| ultra | 211 FPS | 314 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 240 FPS | 393 FPS |
| medium | 209 FPS | 326 FPS |
| high | 169 FPS | 257 FPS |
| ultra | 137 FPS | 209 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 194 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 164 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 140 FPS |
| ultra | 63 FPS | 113 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon RX 7900M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 812 FPS | 938 FPS |
| medium | 642 FPS | 769 FPS |
| high | 551 FPS | 672 FPS |
| ultra | 440 FPS | 504 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 709 FPS |
| medium | 443 FPS | 583 FPS |
| high | 379 FPS | 504 FPS |
| ultra | 329 FPS | 378 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 365 FPS | 495 FPS |
| medium | 297 FPS | 403 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 336 FPS |
| ultra | 186 FPS | 252 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon RX 7900M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 746 FPS | 765 FPS |
| medium | 613 FPS | 653 FPS |
| high | 536 FPS | 588 FPS |
| ultra | 440 FPS | 504 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 594 FPS | 640 FPS |
| medium | 486 FPS | 549 FPS |
| high | 421 FPS | 480 FPS |
| ultra | 330 FPS | 378 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 358 FPS | 435 FPS |
| medium | 308 FPS | 379 FPS |
| high | 285 FPS | 336 FPS |
| ultra | 220 FPS | 252 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 and Radeon RX 7900M

GeForce RTX 4060
GeForce RTX 4060
The GeForce RTX 4060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1830 MHz to 2460 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,548 points. Launch price was $299.

Radeon RX 7900M
Radeon RX 7900M
The Radeon RX 7900M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 19 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1825 MHz to 2090 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,385 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 scores 19,548 versus the Radeon RX 7900M's 22,385 — the Radeon RX 7900M leads by 14.5%. The GeForce RTX 4060 is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon RX 7900M uses RDNA 3.0, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 3,072 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 4,608 (Radeon RX 7900M). Raw compute: 15.11 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 38.52 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7900M). Boost clocks: 2460 MHz vs 2090 MHz. Ray tracing: 24 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 72 (Radeon RX 7900M) with 96 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon RX 7900M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 19,548 | 22,385+15% |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 3072 | 4608+50% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 15.11 TFLOPS | 38.52 TFLOPS+155% |
| Boost Clock | 2460 MHz+18% | 2090 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 192+300% |
| TMUs | 96 | 288+200% |
| L1 Cache | 3 MB | 3 MB |
| L2 Cache | 24 MB+300% | 6 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 24 | 72+200% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
Both GPUs support Frame Generation technologies, but they achieve it differently. The GeForce RTX 4060 uses DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, while the Radeon RX 7900M relies on FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. Both can significantly boost FPS in supported titles, but they are not on the same feature stack.The GeForce RTX 4060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 7900M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon RX 7900M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4060 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 7900M has 16 GB. The Radeon RX 7900M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 272 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 576 GB/s (Radeon RX 7900M) — a 111.8% advantage for the Radeon RX 7900M. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 24 MB (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 6 MB (Radeon RX 7900M) — the GeForce RTX 4060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon RX 7900M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 16 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 272 GB/s | 576 GB/s+112% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 24 MB+300% | 6 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 7900M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 1.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon RX 7900M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+300% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4060) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 7900M). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 7900M).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon RX 7900M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 8th gen | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 draws 115W versus the Radeon RX 7900M's 180W — a 44.1% difference. The GeForce RTX 4060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 330W (Radeon RX 7900M). Power connectors: 8-pin vs Mobile. Card length: 240mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 73°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon RX 7900M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 115W-36% | 180W |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 330W-40% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | Mobile |
| Length | 240mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 73°C-14% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 170.0+37% | 124.4 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












