
GeForce RTX 4060
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 6500M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4060
2023Why buy it
- ✅+162.6% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌130% higher power demand at 115W vs 50W.
Radeon RX 6500M
2022Why buy it
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 115W, a 65W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (7,443 vs 19,548).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 65.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 4060
2023Radeon RX 6500M
2022Why buy it
- ✅+162.6% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 115W, a 65W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌130% higher power demand at 115W vs 50W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (7,443 vs 19,548).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 65.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4060 better than Radeon RX 6500M?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon RX 6500M still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon RX 6500M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 167 FPS | 129 FPS |
| medium | 152 FPS | 115 FPS |
| high | 134 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 115 FPS | 73 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 137 FPS | 118 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 99 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 83 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 62 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 86 FPS | 52 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 48 FPS |
| high | 62 FPS | 35 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 31 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon RX 6500M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 392 FPS | 179 FPS |
| medium | 334 FPS | 139 FPS |
| high | 268 FPS | 103 FPS |
| ultra | 211 FPS | 66 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 240 FPS | 116 FPS |
| medium | 209 FPS | 89 FPS |
| high | 169 FPS | 67 FPS |
| ultra | 137 FPS | 47 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 57 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 44 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 35 FPS |
| ultra | 63 FPS | 24 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon RX 6500M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 812 FPS | 335 FPS |
| medium | 642 FPS | 268 FPS |
| high | 551 FPS | 223 FPS |
| ultra | 440 FPS | 167 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 251 FPS |
| medium | 443 FPS | 201 FPS |
| high | 379 FPS | 167 FPS |
| ultra | 329 FPS | 126 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 365 FPS | 167 FPS |
| medium | 297 FPS | 134 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 107 FPS |
| ultra | 186 FPS | 74 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon RX 6500M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 746 FPS | 303 FPS |
| medium | 613 FPS | 233 FPS |
| high | 536 FPS | 205 FPS |
| ultra | 440 FPS | 167 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 594 FPS | 222 FPS |
| medium | 486 FPS | 165 FPS |
| high | 421 FPS | 137 FPS |
| ultra | 330 FPS | 109 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 358 FPS | 109 FPS |
| medium | 308 FPS | 82 FPS |
| high | 285 FPS | 71 FPS |
| ultra | 220 FPS | 55 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 and Radeon RX 6500M

GeForce RTX 4060
GeForce RTX 4060
The GeForce RTX 4060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1830 MHz to 2460 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,548 points. Launch price was $299.

Radeon RX 6500M
Radeon RX 6500M
The Radeon RX 6500M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2000 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,443 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 scores 19,548 versus the Radeon RX 6500M's 7,443 — the GeForce RTX 4060 leads by 162.6%. The GeForce RTX 4060 is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon RX 6500M uses RDNA 2.0, both on 5 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 1,024 (Radeon RX 6500M). Raw compute: 15.11 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 4.915 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6500M). Boost clocks: 2460 MHz vs 2400 MHz. Ray tracing: 24 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 16 (Radeon RX 6500M) with 96 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon RX 6500M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 19,548+163% | 7,443 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 3072+200% | 1024 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 15.11 TFLOPS+207% | 4.915 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2460 MHz+3% | 2400 MHz |
| ROPs | 48+50% | 32 |
| TMUs | 96+50% | 64 |
| L1 Cache | 3 MB+1100% | 0.25 MB |
| L2 Cache | 24 MB+2300% | 1 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 24+50% | 16 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
Both GPUs support Frame Generation technologies, but they achieve it differently. The GeForce RTX 4060 uses DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, while the Radeon RX 6500M relies on FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. Both can significantly boost FPS in supported titles, but they are not on the same feature stack.The GeForce RTX 4060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 6500M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon RX 6500M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4060 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 6500M has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 4060 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 272 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 144 GB/s (Radeon RX 6500M) — a 88.9% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 24 MB (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 1 MB (Radeon RX 6500M) — the GeForce RTX 4060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon RX 6500M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 272 GB/s+89% | 144 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 24 MB+2300% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 12 (12_2) (Radeon RX 6500M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon RX 6500M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 (12_2) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+33% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4060) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon RX 6500M). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Decode Only) (Radeon RX 6500M).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon RX 6500M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 8th gen | VCN 3.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | VCN 3.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 | H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Decode Only) |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 draws 115W versus the Radeon RX 6500M's 50W — a 78.8% difference. The Radeon RX 6500M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 350W (Radeon RX 6500M). Power connectors: 8-pin vs Mobile. Typical load temperature: 73°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon RX 6500M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 115W | 50W-57% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 350W-36% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | Mobile |
| Length | 240mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 73°C-14% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 170.0+14% | 148.9 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4060 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2022).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon RX 6500M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $299 | — |
| Codename | AD107 | Navi 24 |
| Release | May 18 2023 | January 4 2022 |
| Ranking | #84 | #341 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












