
GeForce RTX 4060
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 580
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4060
2023Why buy it
- ✅+122.2% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 70.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 38.4 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $229 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 115W instead of 185W, a 70W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Radeon RX 580
2017Why buy it
- ✅Costs $70 less on MSRP ($229 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (8,799 vs 19,548).
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 38.4 vs 65.4 G3D/$ ($229 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ❌60.9% higher power demand at 185W vs 115W.
GeForce RTX 4060
2023Radeon RX 580
2017Why buy it
- ✅+122.2% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 70.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 38.4 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $229 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 115W instead of 185W, a 70W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $70 less on MSRP ($229 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (8,799 vs 19,548).
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 38.4 vs 65.4 G3D/$ ($229 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ❌60.9% higher power demand at 185W vs 115W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4060 better than Radeon RX 580?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon RX 580 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon RX 580 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 167 FPS | 146 FPS |
| medium | 152 FPS | 129 FPS |
| high | 134 FPS | 110 FPS |
| ultra | 115 FPS | 81 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 137 FPS | 133 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 111 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 86 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 64 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 86 FPS | 59 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 52 FPS |
| high | 62 FPS | 33 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 29 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon RX 580 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 392 FPS | 159 FPS |
| medium | 334 FPS | 137 FPS |
| high | 268 FPS | 119 FPS |
| ultra | 211 FPS | 93 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 240 FPS | 92 FPS |
| medium | 209 FPS | 73 FPS |
| high | 169 FPS | 57 FPS |
| ultra | 137 FPS | 46 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 37 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 29 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 24 FPS |
| ultra | 63 FPS | 19 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon RX 580 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 812 FPS | 396 FPS |
| medium | 642 FPS | 317 FPS |
| high | 551 FPS | 264 FPS |
| ultra | 440 FPS | 198 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 297 FPS |
| medium | 443 FPS | 238 FPS |
| high | 379 FPS | 198 FPS |
| ultra | 329 FPS | 148 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 365 FPS | 198 FPS |
| medium | 297 FPS | 158 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 132 FPS |
| ultra | 186 FPS | 99 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon RX 580 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 746 FPS | 368 FPS |
| medium | 613 FPS | 317 FPS |
| high | 536 FPS | 264 FPS |
| ultra | 440 FPS | 198 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 594 FPS | 290 FPS |
| medium | 486 FPS | 238 FPS |
| high | 421 FPS | 189 FPS |
| ultra | 330 FPS | 145 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 358 FPS | 154 FPS |
| medium | 308 FPS | 120 FPS |
| high | 285 FPS | 105 FPS |
| ultra | 220 FPS | 85 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 and Radeon RX 580

GeForce RTX 4060
GeForce RTX 4060
The GeForce RTX 4060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1830 MHz to 2460 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,548 points. Launch price was $299.

Radeon RX 580
Radeon RX 580
The Radeon RX 580 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 18 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1257 MHz to 1340 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 185W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,799 points. Launch price was $229.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 scores 19,548 versus the Radeon RX 580's 8,799 — the GeForce RTX 4060 leads by 122.2%. The GeForce RTX 4060 is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon RX 580 uses GCN 4.0, both on 5 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 2,304 (Radeon RX 580). Raw compute: 15.11 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 6.175 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 580). Boost clocks: 2460 MHz vs 1340 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon RX 580 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 19,548+122% | 8,799 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 3072+33% | 2304 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 15.11 TFLOPS+145% | 6.175 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2460 MHz+84% | 1340 MHz |
| ROPs | 48+50% | 32 |
| TMUs | 96 | 144+50% |
| L1 Cache | 3 MB+436% | 0.56 MB |
| L2 Cache | 24 MB+1100% | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
Both GPUs support Frame Generation technologies, but they achieve it differently. The GeForce RTX 4060 uses DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, while the Radeon RX 580 relies on FSR Frame Generation. Both can significantly boost FPS in supported titles, but they are not on the same feature stack.The GeForce RTX 4060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 580 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon RX 580 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | FSR Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of video memory. Memory bandwidth: 272 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 256 GB/s (Radeon RX 580) — a 6.3% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 24 MB (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 2 MB (Radeon RX 580) — the GeForce RTX 4060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon RX 580 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 272 GB/s+6% | 256 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 24 MB+1100% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 12 (Radeon RX 580). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon RX 580 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4060) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon RX 580). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 580).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon RX 580 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 8th gen | VCE 3.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 draws 115W versus the Radeon RX 580's 185W — a 46.7% difference. The GeForce RTX 4060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 500W (Radeon RX 580). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 240mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 73°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon RX 580 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 115W-38% | 185W |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 500W-9% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 240mm | 241mm |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 73°C-3% | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 170.0+257% | 47.6 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4060 launched at $299 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 580 launched at $229. The Radeon RX 580 costs 23.4% less ($70 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 65.4 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 38.4 (Radeon RX 580) — the GeForce RTX 4060 offers 70.3% better value. The GeForce RTX 4060 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2017).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon RX 580 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $299 | $229-23% |
| Performance per Dollar | 65.4+70% | 38.4 |
| Codename | AD107 | Polaris 20 |
| Release | May 18 2023 | April 18 2017 |
| Ranking | #84 | #301 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












