
GeForce RTX 4060
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 5500M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4060
2023Why buy it
- ✅+228.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌35.3% higher power demand at 115W vs 85W.
Radeon RX 5500M
2019Why buy it
- ✅Draws 85W instead of 115W, a 30W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (5,954 vs 19,548).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 65.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 4060
2023Radeon RX 5500M
2019Why buy it
- ✅+228.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 85W instead of 115W, a 30W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌35.3% higher power demand at 115W vs 85W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (5,954 vs 19,548).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 65.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4060 better than Radeon RX 5500M?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon RX 5500M still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon RX 5500M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 167 FPS | 117 FPS |
| medium | 152 FPS | 105 FPS |
| high | 134 FPS | 85 FPS |
| ultra | 115 FPS | 63 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 137 FPS | 109 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 94 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 55 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 86 FPS | 46 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 43 FPS |
| high | 62 FPS | 30 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 26 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon RX 5500M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 392 FPS | 132 FPS |
| medium | 334 FPS | 98 FPS |
| high | 268 FPS | 70 FPS |
| ultra | 211 FPS | 46 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 240 FPS | 86 FPS |
| medium | 209 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 169 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 137 FPS | 32 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 39 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 28 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 23 FPS |
| ultra | 63 FPS | 17 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon RX 5500M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 812 FPS | 268 FPS |
| medium | 642 FPS | 214 FPS |
| high | 551 FPS | 179 FPS |
| ultra | 440 FPS | 134 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 201 FPS |
| medium | 443 FPS | 161 FPS |
| high | 379 FPS | 134 FPS |
| ultra | 329 FPS | 100 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 365 FPS | 134 FPS |
| medium | 297 FPS | 107 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 89 FPS |
| ultra | 186 FPS | 67 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon RX 5500M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 746 FPS | 268 FPS |
| medium | 613 FPS | 214 FPS |
| high | 536 FPS | 179 FPS |
| ultra | 440 FPS | 134 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 594 FPS | 201 FPS |
| medium | 486 FPS | 161 FPS |
| high | 421 FPS | 134 FPS |
| ultra | 330 FPS | 100 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 358 FPS | 103 FPS |
| medium | 308 FPS | 80 FPS |
| high | 285 FPS | 70 FPS |
| ultra | 220 FPS | 56 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 and Radeon RX 5500M

GeForce RTX 4060
GeForce RTX 4060
The GeForce RTX 4060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1830 MHz to 2460 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,548 points. Launch price was $299.

Radeon RX 5500M
Radeon RX 5500M
The Radeon RX 5500M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 7 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1375 MHz to 1645 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 85W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,954 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 scores 19,548 versus the Radeon RX 5500M's 5,954 — the GeForce RTX 4060 leads by 228.3%. The GeForce RTX 4060 is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon RX 5500M uses RDNA 1.0, both on 5 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 1,408 (Radeon RX 5500M). Raw compute: 15.11 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 4.632 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 5500M). Boost clocks: 2460 MHz vs 1645 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon RX 5500M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 19,548+228% | 5,954 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 3072+118% | 1408 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 15.11 TFLOPS+226% | 4.632 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2460 MHz+50% | 1645 MHz |
| ROPs | 48+50% | 32 |
| TMUs | 96+9% | 88 |
| L2 Cache | 24 MB+1100% | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
Both GPUs support Frame Generation technologies, but they achieve it differently. The GeForce RTX 4060 uses DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, while the Radeon RX 5500M relies on FSR Frame Generation. Both can significantly boost FPS in supported titles, but they are not on the same feature stack.The GeForce RTX 4060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 5500M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon RX 5500M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | FSR Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4060 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 5500M has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 4060 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 272 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 224 GB/s (Radeon RX 5500M) — a 21.4% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 24 MB (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 2 MB (Radeon RX 5500M) — the GeForce RTX 4060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon RX 5500M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 272 GB/s+21% | 224 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 24 MB+1100% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 12 (Radeon RX 5500M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon RX 5500M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+33% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4060) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon RX 5500M). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 5500M).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon RX 5500M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 8th gen | VCN 2.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | VCN 2.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 draws 115W versus the Radeon RX 5500M's 85W — a 30% difference. The Radeon RX 5500M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 350W (Radeon RX 5500M). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 240mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 73°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon RX 5500M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 115W | 85W-26% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 350W-36% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 240mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 73°C-3% | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 170.0+143% | 70.0 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4060 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon RX 5500M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $299 | — |
| Codename | AD107 | Navi 14 |
| Release | May 18 2023 | October 7 2019 |
| Ranking | #84 | #400 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












