
GeForce RTX 4060
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro W5700X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4060
2023Why buy it
- ✅24.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $700 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 271.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 17.6 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Radeon Pro W5700X
2019Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌234.1% HIGHER MSRP$999 MSRPvs$299 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 17.6 vs 65.4 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 4060
2023Radeon Pro W5700X
2019Why buy it
- ✅24.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $700 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 271.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 17.6 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌234.1% HIGHER MSRP$999 MSRPvs$299 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 17.6 vs 65.4 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4060 better than Radeon Pro W5700X?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon Pro W5700X still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon Pro W5700X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 167 FPS | 198 FPS |
| medium | 152 FPS | 182 FPS |
| high | 134 FPS | 157 FPS |
| ultra | 115 FPS | 139 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 137 FPS | 183 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 153 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 124 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 110 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 86 FPS | 115 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 62 FPS | 72 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 66 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon Pro W5700X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 392 FPS | 254 FPS |
| medium | 334 FPS | 213 FPS |
| high | 268 FPS | 156 FPS |
| ultra | 211 FPS | 116 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 240 FPS | 164 FPS |
| medium | 209 FPS | 139 FPS |
| high | 169 FPS | 109 FPS |
| ultra | 137 FPS | 82 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 81 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 69 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 57 FPS |
| ultra | 63 FPS | 42 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon Pro W5700X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 812 FPS | 778 FPS |
| medium | 642 FPS | 624 FPS |
| high | 551 FPS | 528 FPS |
| ultra | 440 FPS | 396 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 594 FPS |
| medium | 443 FPS | 475 FPS |
| high | 379 FPS | 396 FPS |
| ultra | 329 FPS | 297 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 365 FPS | 396 FPS |
| medium | 297 FPS | 314 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 249 FPS |
| ultra | 186 FPS | 198 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon Pro W5700X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 746 FPS | 390 FPS |
| medium | 613 FPS | 341 FPS |
| high | 536 FPS | 292 FPS |
| ultra | 440 FPS | 234 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 594 FPS | 316 FPS |
| medium | 486 FPS | 276 FPS |
| high | 421 FPS | 226 FPS |
| ultra | 330 FPS | 179 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 358 FPS | 197 FPS |
| medium | 308 FPS | 182 FPS |
| high | 285 FPS | 150 FPS |
| ultra | 220 FPS | 125 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 and Radeon Pro W5700X

GeForce RTX 4060
GeForce RTX 4060
The GeForce RTX 4060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1830 MHz to 2460 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,548 points. Launch price was $299.

Radeon Pro W5700X
Radeon Pro W5700X
The Radeon Pro W5700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 11 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1243 MHz to 2040 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 205W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 17,591 points. Launch price was $999.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 scores 19,548 versus the Radeon Pro W5700X's 17,591 — the GeForce RTX 4060 leads by 11.1%. The GeForce RTX 4060 is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon Pro W5700X uses RDNA 1.0, both on 5 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 2,304 (Radeon Pro W5700X). Raw compute: 15.11 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 9.4 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro W5700X). Boost clocks: 2460 MHz vs 2040 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon Pro W5700X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 19,548+11% | 17,591 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 3072+33% | 2304 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 15.11 TFLOPS+61% | 9.4 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2460 MHz+21% | 2040 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 64+33% |
| TMUs | 96 | 144+50% |
| L2 Cache | 24 MB+500% | 4 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon Pro W5700X lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro W5700X relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon Pro W5700X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4060 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro W5700X has 16 GB. The Radeon Pro W5700X offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 24 MB (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro W5700X) — the GeForce RTX 4060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon Pro W5700X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 16 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 24 MB+500% | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 12.0 (Radeon Pro W5700X). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon Pro W5700X |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 6+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4060) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro W5700X). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs HEVC,H.264 (Radeon Pro W5700X).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon Pro W5700X |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 8th gen | VCN 2.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | VCN 2.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 | HEVC,H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 draws 115W versus the Radeon Pro W5700X's 205W — a 56.3% difference. The GeForce RTX 4060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 650W (Radeon Pro W5700X). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 240mm vs 305mm, occupying 2 vs 4 slots. Typical load temperature: 73°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon Pro W5700X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 115W-44% | 205W |
| Recommended PSU | 550W-15% | 650W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 240mm | 305mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2-50% | 4 |
| Temp (Load) | 73°C-14% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 170.0+98% | 85.8 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4060 launched at $299 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro W5700X launched at $999. The GeForce RTX 4060 costs 70.1% less ($700 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 65.4 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 17.6 (Radeon Pro W5700X) — the GeForce RTX 4060 offers 271.6% better value. The GeForce RTX 4060 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon Pro W5700X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $299-70% | $999 |
| Performance per Dollar | 65.4+272% | 17.6 |
| Codename | AD107 | Navi 10 |
| Release | May 18 2023 | December 11 2019 |
| Ranking | #84 | #130 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












