G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 4060

2023

Why buy it

✅+62.9% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Costs $1,701 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
✅Delivers 989.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 6.0 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Radeon PRO V710

2024

Why buy it

✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (12,000 vs 19,548).
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌
568.9% HIGHER MSRP
$2,000 MSRPvs$299 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.0 vs 65.4 G3D/$ ($2,000 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 4060

2023

Radeon PRO V710

2024

Why buy it

✅+62.9% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Costs $1,701 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
✅Delivers 989.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 6.0 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Why buy it

✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (12,000 vs 19,548).
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌
568.9% HIGHER MSRP
$2,000 MSRPvs$299 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.0 vs 65.4 G3D/$ ($2,000 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 4060 better than Radeon PRO V710?

Yes. GeForce RTX 4060 is the better GPU overall here. You are getting 62.9% higher PassMark G3D performance and DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. It also comes from 2023 instead of 2024, which helps its case as the more complete modern gaming card.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 4060 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 62.9% more raw performance headroom and better frame-generation support with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023) instead of FSR upscaling. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 4060 is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. GeForce RTX 4060 is about $1,701 cheaper on MSRP at $299 MSRP versus $2,000 MSRP, and you are getting 62.9% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 989.6%. Radeon PRO V710 is the newer 2024 card, so it still has a real case if you care more about newer architecture than about squeezing out the strongest gaming value today.

When does Radeon PRO V710 make more sense than GeForce RTX 4060?

Yes. Radeon PRO V710 is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is very strong for 1080p, good for 1440p, and more limited at 4K. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture and staying closer to $2,000 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of GeForce RTX 4060. The trade-off is that GeForce RTX 4060 currently gives you 62.9% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 989.6%.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 4060 Benchmark Check

Radeon PRO V710 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060	Radeon PRO V710
1080p
low	167 FPS	215 FPS
medium	152 FPS	196 FPS
high	134 FPS	170 FPS
ultra	115 FPS	130 FPS
1440p
low	137 FPS	180 FPS
medium	114 FPS	146 FPS
high	99 FPS	125 FPS
ultra	90 FPS	102 FPS
4K
low	86 FPS	96 FPS
medium	74 FPS	81 FPS
high	62 FPS	64 FPS
ultra	55 FPS	56 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Open Radeon PRO V710

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060	Radeon PRO V710
1080p
low	392 FPS	509 FPS
medium	334 FPS	414 FPS
high	268 FPS	327 FPS
ultra	211 FPS	270 FPS
1440p
low	240 FPS	338 FPS
medium	209 FPS	269 FPS
high	169 FPS	221 FPS
ultra	137 FPS	185 FPS
4K
low	119 FPS	157 FPS
medium	98 FPS	130 FPS
high	82 FPS	108 FPS
ultra	63 FPS	87 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Open Radeon PRO V710

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060	Radeon PRO V710
1080p
low	812 FPS	540 FPS
medium	642 FPS	432 FPS
high	551 FPS	360 FPS
ultra	440 FPS	270 FPS
1440p
low	535 FPS	405 FPS
medium	443 FPS	324 FPS
high	379 FPS	270 FPS
ultra	329 FPS	202 FPS
4K
low	365 FPS	270 FPS
medium	297 FPS	216 FPS
high	234 FPS	180 FPS
ultra	186 FPS	135 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Open Radeon PRO V710

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060	Radeon PRO V710
1080p
low	746 FPS	540 FPS
medium	613 FPS	432 FPS
high	536 FPS	360 FPS
ultra	440 FPS	270 FPS
1440p
low	594 FPS	405 FPS
medium	486 FPS	324 FPS
high	421 FPS	270 FPS
ultra	330 FPS	202 FPS
4K
low	358 FPS	270 FPS
medium	308 FPS	216 FPS
high	285 FPS	180 FPS
ultra	220 FPS	135 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Open Radeon PRO V710

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 and Radeon PRO V710

GeForce RTX 4060

The GeForce RTX 4060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1830 MHz to 2460 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,548 points. Launch price was $299.

Radeon PRO V710

The Radeon PRO V710 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 3 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1900 MHz to 2000 MHz. It has 3456 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 158W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 54 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,000 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 scores 19,548 versus the Radeon PRO V710's 12,000 — the GeForce RTX 4060 leads by 62.9%. The GeForce RTX 4060 is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon PRO V710 uses RDNA 3.0, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 3,072 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 3,456 (Radeon PRO V710). Raw compute: 15.11 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 27.65 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO V710). Boost clocks: 2460 MHz vs 2000 MHz. Ray tracing: 24 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 54 (Radeon PRO V710) with 96 Tensor cores.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060	Radeon PRO V710
G3D Mark Score	19,548+63%	12,000
Architecture	Ada Lovelace	RDNA 3.0
Process Node	5 nm	5 nm
Shading Units	3072	3456+13%
Compute (TFLOPS)	15.11 TFLOPS	27.65 TFLOPS+83%
Boost Clock	2460 MHz+23%	2000 MHz
ROPs	48	96+100%
TMUs	96	216+125%
L1 Cache	3 MB+300%	0.75 MB
L2 Cache	24 MB+1100%	2 MB
Ray Tracing Cores	24	54+125%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon PRO V710 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon PRO V710 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060	Radeon PRO V710
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	Yes (DLSS 3.5)	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 24 MB (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 2 MB (Radeon PRO V710) — the GeForce RTX 4060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060	Radeon PRO V710
VRAM Capacity	8 GB	8 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	128-bit	256-bit+100%
L2 Cache	24 MB+1100%	2 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO V710). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060	Radeon PRO V710
DirectX	12 Ultimate	12.2+2%
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	0

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4060) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO V710). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO V710).

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060	Radeon PRO V710
Encoder	NVENC 8th gen	VCN 4.0
Decoder	NVDEC 5th gen	VCN 4.0
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4060 draws 115W versus the Radeon PRO V710's 158W — a 31.5% difference. The GeForce RTX 4060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 500W (Radeon PRO V710). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 240mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 73°C vs 80°C.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060	Radeon PRO V710
TDP	115W-27%	158W
Recommended PSU	550W	500W-9%
Power Connector	8-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	240mm	267mm
Height	111mm	111mm
Slots	2	1-50%
Temp (Load)	73°C-9%	80°C
Perf/Watt	170.0+124%	75.9

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 4060 launched at $299 MSRP, while the Radeon PRO V710 launched at $2000. The GeForce RTX 4060 costs 85% less ($1701 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 65.4 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 6.0 (Radeon PRO V710) — the GeForce RTX 4060 offers 990% better value. The Radeon PRO V710 is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2023).