
GeForce RTX 4060
Popular choices:

Quadro RTX 8000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4060
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $9,700 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $9,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 3180.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 2.0 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $9,999 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 115W instead of 260W, a 145W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro RTX 8000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 48 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (96 vs 576), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
Quadro RTX 8000
2018Why buy it
- ✅44.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅500% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (576 vs 96).
- ✅500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (48 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 48 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌3244.1% HIGHER MSRP$9,999 MSRPvs$299 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.0 vs 65.4 G3D/$ ($9,999 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ❌126.1% higher power demand at 260W vs 115W.
GeForce RTX 4060
2023Quadro RTX 8000
2018Why buy it
- ✅Costs $9,700 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $9,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 3180.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 2.0 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $9,999 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 115W instead of 260W, a 145W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅44.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅500% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (576 vs 96).
- ✅500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (48 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro RTX 8000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 48 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (96 vs 576), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 48 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌3244.1% HIGHER MSRP$9,999 MSRPvs$299 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.0 vs 65.4 G3D/$ ($9,999 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ❌126.1% higher power demand at 260W vs 115W.
Quick Answers
So, is Quadro RTX 8000 better than GeForce RTX 4060?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce RTX 4060 make more sense than Quadro RTX 8000?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | Quadro RTX 8000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 167 FPS | 205 FPS |
| medium | 152 FPS | 190 FPS |
| high | 134 FPS | 166 FPS |
| ultra | 115 FPS | 151 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 137 FPS | 187 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 158 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 130 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 121 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 86 FPS | 119 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 100 FPS |
| high | 62 FPS | 77 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 70 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | Quadro RTX 8000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 392 FPS | 499 FPS |
| medium | 334 FPS | 442 FPS |
| high | 268 FPS | 343 FPS |
| ultra | 211 FPS | 289 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 240 FPS | 325 FPS |
| medium | 209 FPS | 274 FPS |
| high | 169 FPS | 223 FPS |
| ultra | 137 FPS | 183 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 153 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 135 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 113 FPS |
| ultra | 63 FPS | 90 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | Quadro RTX 8000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 812 FPS | 897 FPS |
| medium | 642 FPS | 717 FPS |
| high | 551 FPS | 598 FPS |
| ultra | 440 FPS | 448 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 673 FPS |
| medium | 443 FPS | 538 FPS |
| high | 379 FPS | 448 FPS |
| ultra | 329 FPS | 336 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 365 FPS | 448 FPS |
| medium | 297 FPS | 359 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 299 FPS |
| ultra | 186 FPS | 224 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | Quadro RTX 8000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 746 FPS | 673 FPS |
| medium | 613 FPS | 605 FPS |
| high | 536 FPS | 515 FPS |
| ultra | 440 FPS | 448 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 594 FPS | 544 FPS |
| medium | 486 FPS | 487 FPS |
| high | 421 FPS | 418 FPS |
| ultra | 330 FPS | 336 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 358 FPS | 355 FPS |
| medium | 308 FPS | 323 FPS |
| high | 285 FPS | 297 FPS |
| ultra | 220 FPS | 224 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 and Quadro RTX 8000

GeForce RTX 4060
GeForce RTX 4060
The GeForce RTX 4060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1830 MHz to 2460 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,548 points. Launch price was $299.

Quadro RTX 8000
Quadro RTX 8000
The Quadro RTX 8000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 13 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1770 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 260W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,927 points. Launch price was $9,999.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 4060 scores 19,548 and the Quadro RTX 8000 reaches 19,927 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 4060 is built on Ada Lovelace while the Quadro RTX 8000 uses Turing, both on 5 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 4,608 (Quadro RTX 8000). Raw compute: 15.11 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 16.31 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 8000). Boost clocks: 2460 MHz vs 1770 MHz. Ray tracing: 24 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 72 (Quadro RTX 8000) with 96 Tensor cores vs 576.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Quadro RTX 8000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 19,548 | 19,927+2% |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Turing |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 3072 | 4608+50% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 15.11 TFLOPS | 16.31 TFLOPS+8% |
| Boost Clock | 2460 MHz+39% | 1770 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 96+100% |
| TMUs | 96 | 288+200% |
| L1 Cache | 3 MB | 4.5 MB+50% |
| L2 Cache | 24 MB+300% | 6 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 24 | 72+200% |
| Tensor Cores | 96 | 576+500% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Quadro RTX 8000 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The Quadro RTX 8000 supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 4060 is capped at DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Quadro RTX 8000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4060 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro RTX 8000 has 48 GB. The Quadro RTX 8000 offers 500% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 272 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 768 GB/s (Quadro RTX 8000) — a 182.4% advantage for the Quadro RTX 8000. Bus width: 128-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 24 MB (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 6 MB (Quadro RTX 8000) — the GeForce RTX 4060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Quadro RTX 8000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 48 GB+500% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 272 GB/s | 768 GB/s+182% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 384-bit+200% |
| L2 Cache | 24 MB+300% | 6 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 12.2 (Quadro RTX 8000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Quadro RTX 8000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4060) vs NVENC 7.0 (Quadro RTX 8000). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs PureVideo HD VP10. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro RTX 8000).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Quadro RTX 8000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 8th gen | NVENC 7.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | PureVideo HD VP10 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 draws 115W versus the Quadro RTX 8000's 260W — a 77.3% difference. The GeForce RTX 4060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 650W (Quadro RTX 8000). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 1x 8-pin + 1x 6-pin. Card length: 240mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 73°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Quadro RTX 8000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 115W-56% | 260W |
| Recommended PSU | 550W-15% | 650W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 1x 8-pin + 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 240mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 73°C-9% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 170.0+122% | 76.6 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4060 launched at $299 MSRP, while the Quadro RTX 8000 launched at $9999. The GeForce RTX 4060 costs 97% less ($9700 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 65.4 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 2.0 (Quadro RTX 8000) — the GeForce RTX 4060 offers 3170% better value. The GeForce RTX 4060 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2018).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Quadro RTX 8000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $299-97% | $9999 |
| Performance per Dollar | 65.4+3170% | 2.0 |
| Codename | AD107 | TU102 |
| Release | May 18 2023 | August 13 2018 |
| Ranking | #84 | #78 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












