
GeForce RTX 4060
Popular choices:

Quadro RTX 5000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4060
2023Why buy it
- ✅+26.6% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $2,000 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $2,299 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 873.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 6.7 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $2,299 MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 115W instead of 230W, a 115W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro RTX 5000 across 36 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (96 vs 384), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
Quadro RTX 5000
2018Why buy it
- ✅11.2% more average FPS across 36 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅300% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (384 vs 96).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (15,443 vs 19,548).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌668.9% HIGHER MSRP$2,299 MSRPvs$299 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.7 vs 65.4 G3D/$ ($2,299 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ❌100% higher power demand at 230W vs 115W.
GeForce RTX 4060
2023Quadro RTX 5000
2018Why buy it
- ✅+26.6% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $2,000 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $2,299 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 873.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 6.7 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $2,299 MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 115W instead of 230W, a 115W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅11.2% more average FPS across 36 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅300% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (384 vs 96).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro RTX 5000 across 36 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (96 vs 384), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (15,443 vs 19,548).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌668.9% HIGHER MSRP$2,299 MSRPvs$299 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.7 vs 65.4 G3D/$ ($2,299 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ❌100% higher power demand at 230W vs 115W.
Quick Answers
So, is Quadro RTX 5000 better than GeForce RTX 4060?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce RTX 4060 make more sense than Quadro RTX 5000?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | Quadro RTX 5000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 167 FPS | 214 FPS |
| medium | 152 FPS | 196 FPS |
| high | 134 FPS | 173 FPS |
| ultra | 115 FPS | 156 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 137 FPS | 193 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 161 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 135 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 126 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 86 FPS | 126 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 106 FPS |
| high | 62 FPS | 85 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 78 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | Quadro RTX 5000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 392 FPS | 455 FPS |
| medium | 334 FPS | 393 FPS |
| high | 268 FPS | 320 FPS |
| ultra | 211 FPS | 271 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 240 FPS | 282 FPS |
| medium | 209 FPS | 236 FPS |
| high | 169 FPS | 207 FPS |
| ultra | 137 FPS | 171 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 128 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 110 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 93 FPS |
| ultra | 63 FPS | 73 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | Quadro RTX 5000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 812 FPS | 695 FPS |
| medium | 642 FPS | 556 FPS |
| high | 551 FPS | 463 FPS |
| ultra | 440 FPS | 347 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 521 FPS |
| medium | 443 FPS | 417 FPS |
| high | 379 FPS | 347 FPS |
| ultra | 329 FPS | 261 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 365 FPS | 347 FPS |
| medium | 297 FPS | 278 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 232 FPS |
| ultra | 186 FPS | 174 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | Quadro RTX 5000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 746 FPS | 546 FPS |
| medium | 613 FPS | 466 FPS |
| high | 536 FPS | 399 FPS |
| ultra | 440 FPS | 330 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 594 FPS | 447 FPS |
| medium | 486 FPS | 384 FPS |
| high | 421 FPS | 310 FPS |
| ultra | 330 FPS | 255 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 358 FPS | 278 FPS |
| medium | 308 FPS | 260 FPS |
| high | 285 FPS | 227 FPS |
| ultra | 220 FPS | 174 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 and Quadro RTX 5000

GeForce RTX 4060
GeForce RTX 4060
The GeForce RTX 4060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1830 MHz to 2460 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,548 points. Launch price was $299.

Quadro RTX 5000
Quadro RTX 5000
The Quadro RTX 5000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 13 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1620 MHz to 1815 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,443 points. Launch price was $2,299.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 scores 19,548 versus the Quadro RTX 5000's 15,443 — the GeForce RTX 4060 leads by 26.6%. The GeForce RTX 4060 is built on Ada Lovelace while the Quadro RTX 5000 uses Turing, both on 5 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 3,072 (Quadro RTX 5000). Raw compute: 15.11 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 11.15 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 5000). Boost clocks: 2460 MHz vs 1815 MHz. Ray tracing: 24 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 48 (Quadro RTX 5000) with 96 Tensor cores vs 384.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Quadro RTX 5000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 19,548+27% | 15,443 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Turing |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 3072 | 3072 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 15.11 TFLOPS+36% | 11.15 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2460 MHz+36% | 1815 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 64+33% |
| TMUs | 96 | 192+100% |
| L1 Cache | 3 MB | 3 MB |
| L2 Cache | 24 MB+500% | 4 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 24 | 48+100% |
| Tensor Cores | 96 | 384+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
Both cards support Frame Generation, but the Quadro RTX 5000 is on a newer tier with DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation, while the GeForce RTX 4060 tops out at DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation.The Quadro RTX 5000 supports the newer DLSS 4 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce RTX 4060 is capped at DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Quadro RTX 5000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | DLSS 4 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation+14% |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | Yes (DLSS 4)+14% |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4060 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro RTX 5000 has 16 GB. The Quadro RTX 5000 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 272 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 448 GB/s (Quadro RTX 5000) — a 64.7% advantage for the Quadro RTX 5000. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 24 MB (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 4 MB (Quadro RTX 5000) — the GeForce RTX 4060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Quadro RTX 5000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 16 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 272 GB/s | 448 GB/s+65% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 24 MB+500% | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 12 Ultimate (Quadro RTX 5000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Quadro RTX 5000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4060) vs NVENC (7th Gen) (Quadro RTX 5000). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs NVDEC (4th Gen). Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode),VP9 (Quadro RTX 5000).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Quadro RTX 5000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 8th gen | NVENC (7th Gen) |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | NVDEC (4th Gen) |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 | H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode),VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 draws 115W versus the Quadro RTX 5000's 230W — a 66.7% difference. The GeForce RTX 4060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 650W (Quadro RTX 5000). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 73°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Quadro RTX 5000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 115W-50% | 230W |
| Recommended PSU | 550W-15% | 650W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 240mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 73°C-3% | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 170.0+153% | 67.1 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4060 launched at $299 MSRP, while the Quadro RTX 5000 launched at $2299. The GeForce RTX 4060 costs 87% less ($2000 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 65.4 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 6.7 (Quadro RTX 5000) — the GeForce RTX 4060 offers 876.1% better value. The GeForce RTX 4060 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2018).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Quadro RTX 5000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $299-87% | $2299 |
| Performance per Dollar | 65.4+876% | 6.7 |
| Codename | AD107 | TU104 |
| Release | May 18 2023 | August 13 2018 |
| Ranking | #84 | #143 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












