
GeForce RTX 4060
Popular choices:

GRID RTX6000-1Q
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4060
2023Why buy it
- ✅+54.9% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $6,000 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $6,299 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 3164% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 2.0 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $6,299 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
GRID RTX6000-1Q
2015Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (12,617 vs 19,548).
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌2006.7% HIGHER MSRP$6,299 MSRPvs$299 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.0 vs 65.4 G3D/$ ($6,299 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 4060
2023GRID RTX6000-1Q
2015Why buy it
- ✅+54.9% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $6,000 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $6,299 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 3164% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 2.0 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $6,299 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (12,617 vs 19,548).
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌2006.7% HIGHER MSRP$6,299 MSRPvs$299 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.0 vs 65.4 G3D/$ ($6,299 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4060 better than GRID RTX6000-1Q?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GRID RTX6000-1Q still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | GRID RTX6000-1Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 167 FPS | 137 FPS |
| medium | 152 FPS | 116 FPS |
| high | 134 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 115 FPS | 58 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 137 FPS | 115 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 97 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 72 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 43 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 86 FPS | 40 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 36 FPS |
| high | 62 FPS | 23 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 19 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | GRID RTX6000-1Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 392 FPS | 165 FPS |
| medium | 334 FPS | 134 FPS |
| high | 268 FPS | 100 FPS |
| ultra | 211 FPS | 78 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 240 FPS | 119 FPS |
| medium | 209 FPS | 95 FPS |
| high | 169 FPS | 76 FPS |
| ultra | 137 FPS | 58 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 68 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 54 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 63 FPS | 33 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | GRID RTX6000-1Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 812 FPS | 568 FPS |
| medium | 642 FPS | 454 FPS |
| high | 551 FPS | 379 FPS |
| ultra | 440 FPS | 284 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 426 FPS |
| medium | 443 FPS | 341 FPS |
| high | 379 FPS | 284 FPS |
| ultra | 329 FPS | 213 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 365 FPS | 284 FPS |
| medium | 297 FPS | 227 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 189 FPS |
| ultra | 186 FPS | 142 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | GRID RTX6000-1Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 746 FPS | 274 FPS |
| medium | 613 FPS | 235 FPS |
| high | 536 FPS | 192 FPS |
| ultra | 440 FPS | 153 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 594 FPS | 210 FPS |
| medium | 486 FPS | 184 FPS |
| high | 421 FPS | 146 FPS |
| ultra | 330 FPS | 114 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 358 FPS | 114 FPS |
| medium | 308 FPS | 90 FPS |
| high | 285 FPS | 74 FPS |
| ultra | 220 FPS | 57 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 and GRID RTX6000-1Q

GeForce RTX 4060
GeForce RTX 4060
The GeForce RTX 4060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1830 MHz to 2460 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,548 points. Launch price was $299.

GRID RTX6000-1Q
GRID RTX6000-1Q
The GRID RTX6000-1Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,617 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 scores 19,548 versus the GRID RTX6000-1Q's 12,617 — the GeForce RTX 4060 leads by 54.9%. The GeForce RTX 4060 is built on Ada Lovelace while the GRID RTX6000-1Q uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 5 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 2,048 (GRID RTX6000-1Q). Raw compute: 15.11 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID RTX6000-1Q). Boost clocks: 2460 MHz vs 1178 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | GRID RTX6000-1Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 19,548+55% | 12,617 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 3072+50% | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 15.11 TFLOPS+213% | 4.825 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2460 MHz+109% | 1178 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 64+33% |
| TMUs | 96 | 128+33% |
| L1 Cache | 3 MB+300% | 0.75 MB |
| L2 Cache | 24 MB+1100% | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GRID RTX6000-1Q lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GRID RTX6000-1Q supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 4060 is capped at DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | GRID RTX6000-1Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 24 MB (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 2 MB (GRID RTX6000-1Q) — the GeForce RTX 4060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | GRID RTX6000-1Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 24 MB+1100% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 12.2 (GRID RTX6000-1Q). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | GRID RTX6000-1Q |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 7th Gen NVENC (GRID RTX6000-1Q). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (GRID RTX6000-1Q).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | GRID RTX6000-1Q |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 8th gen | 7th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 draws 115W versus the GRID RTX6000-1Q's 225W — a 64.7% difference. The GeForce RTX 4060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 500W (GRID RTX6000-1Q). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 240mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 73°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | GRID RTX6000-1Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 115W-49% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 500W-9% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 240mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 73°C-14% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 170.0+203% | 56.1 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4060 launched at $299 MSRP, while the GRID RTX6000-1Q launched at $6299. The GeForce RTX 4060 costs 95.3% less ($6000 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 65.4 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 2.0 (GRID RTX6000-1Q) — the GeForce RTX 4060 offers 3170% better value. The GeForce RTX 4060 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | GRID RTX6000-1Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $299-95% | $6299 |
| Performance per Dollar | 65.4+3170% | 2.0 |
| Codename | AD107 | GM204 |
| Release | May 18 2023 | August 30 2015 |
| Ranking | #84 | #525 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












