
GeForce RTX 4060
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 5080
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4060
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $700 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 81.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 36.0 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 115W instead of 360W, a 245W reduction.
- ✅Measures 240mm instead of 304mm, a 64mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 5080 across 14 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (96 vs 336), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 5080 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
GeForce RTX 5080
2025Why buy it
- ✅76.2% more average FPS across 14 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅250% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (336 vs 96).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌234.1% HIGHER MSRP$999 MSRPvs$299 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 36.0 vs 65.4 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ❌213% higher power demand at 360W vs 115W.
- ❌26.7% longer card at 304mm vs 240mm.
GeForce RTX 4060
2023GeForce RTX 5080
2025Why buy it
- ✅Costs $700 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 81.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 36.0 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 115W instead of 360W, a 245W reduction.
- ✅Measures 240mm instead of 304mm, a 64mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅76.2% more average FPS across 14 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅250% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (336 vs 96).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 5080 across 14 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (96 vs 336), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 5080 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
Trade-offs
- ❌234.1% HIGHER MSRP$999 MSRPvs$299 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 36.0 vs 65.4 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ❌213% higher power demand at 360W vs 115W.
- ❌26.7% longer card at 304mm vs 240mm.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 5080 better than GeForce RTX 4060?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce RTX 4060 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | GeForce RTX 5080 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 167 FPS | 350 FPS |
| medium | 152 FPS | 334 FPS |
| high | 134 FPS | 280 FPS |
| ultra | 115 FPS | 221 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 137 FPS | 326 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 274 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 215 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 173 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 86 FPS | 194 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 160 FPS |
| high | 62 FPS | 121 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 108 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | GeForce RTX 5080 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 392 FPS | 822 FPS |
| medium | 334 FPS | 651 FPS |
| high | 268 FPS | 511 FPS |
| ultra | 211 FPS | 447 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 240 FPS | 651 FPS |
| medium | 209 FPS | 536 FPS |
| high | 169 FPS | 434 FPS |
| ultra | 137 FPS | 360 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 360 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 306 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 277 FPS |
| ultra | 63 FPS | 234 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | GeForce RTX 5080 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 812 FPS | 944 FPS |
| medium | 642 FPS | 772 FPS |
| high | 551 FPS | 699 FPS |
| ultra | 440 FPS | 604 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 731 FPS |
| medium | 443 FPS | 598 FPS |
| high | 379 FPS | 529 FPS |
| ultra | 329 FPS | 452 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 365 FPS | 506 FPS |
| medium | 297 FPS | 419 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 377 FPS |
| ultra | 186 FPS | 317 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | GeForce RTX 5080 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 746 FPS | 999 FPS |
| medium | 613 FPS | 944 FPS |
| high | 536 FPS | 831 FPS |
| ultra | 440 FPS | 742 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 594 FPS | 800 FPS |
| medium | 486 FPS | 698 FPS |
| high | 421 FPS | 614 FPS |
| ultra | 330 FPS | 537 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 358 FPS | 581 FPS |
| medium | 308 FPS | 513 FPS |
| high | 285 FPS | 457 FPS |
| ultra | 220 FPS | 400 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 and GeForce RTX 5080

GeForce RTX 4060
GeForce RTX 4060
The GeForce RTX 4060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1830 MHz to 2460 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,548 points. Launch price was $299.

GeForce RTX 5080
GeForce RTX 5080
The GeForce RTX 5080 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 30 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2295 MHz to 2617 MHz. It has 10752 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 360W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 84 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 35,924 points. Launch price was $999.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 scores 19,548 versus the GeForce RTX 5080's 35,924 — the GeForce RTX 5080 leads by 83.8%. The GeForce RTX 4060 is built on Ada Lovelace while the GeForce RTX 5080 uses Blackwell 2.0, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 3,072 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 10,752 (GeForce RTX 5080). Raw compute: 15.11 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 56.28 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 5080). Boost clocks: 2460 MHz vs 2617 MHz. Ray tracing: 24 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 84 (GeForce RTX 5080) with 96 Tensor cores vs 336.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | GeForce RTX 5080 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 19,548 | 35,924+84% |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Blackwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 3072 | 10752+250% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 15.11 TFLOPS | 56.28 TFLOPS+272% |
| Boost Clock | 2460 MHz | 2617 MHz+6% |
| ROPs | 48 | 112+133% |
| TMUs | 96 | 336+250% |
| L1 Cache | 3 MB | 10.5 MB+250% |
| L2 Cache | 24 MB | 64 MB+167% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 24 | 84+250% |
| Tensor Cores | 96 | 336+250% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
Both cards support Frame Generation, but the GeForce RTX 5080 is on a newer tier with DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation, while the GeForce RTX 4060 tops out at DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation.The GeForce RTX 5080 supports the newer DLSS 4 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce RTX 4060 is capped at DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | GeForce RTX 5080 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | DLSS 4 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation+14% |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | Yes (DLSS 4)+14% |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4060 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 5080 has 16 GB. The GeForce RTX 5080 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 272 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 1024 GB/s (GeForce RTX 5080) — a 276.5% advantage for the GeForce RTX 5080. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 24 MB (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 64 MB (GeForce RTX 5080) — the GeForce RTX 5080 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | GeForce RTX 5080 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 16 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR7 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 272 GB/s | 1024 GB/s+276% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 24 MB | 64 MB+167% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 5080). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | GeForce RTX 5080 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 9th Gen NVENC (2x) (GeForce RTX 5080). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs 6th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 5080).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | GeForce RTX 5080 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 8th gen | 9th Gen NVENC (2x) |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | 6th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 draws 115W versus the GeForce RTX 5080's 360W — a 103.2% difference. The GeForce RTX 4060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 850W (GeForce RTX 5080). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 16-pin (12VHPWR). Card length: 240mm vs 304mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 73°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | GeForce RTX 5080 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 115W-68% | 360W |
| Recommended PSU | 550W-35% | 850W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 16-pin (12VHPWR) |
| Length | 240mm | 304mm |
| Height | 111mm | 137mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 73°C-9% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 170.0+70% | 99.8 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4060 launched at $299 MSRP, while the GeForce RTX 5080 launched at $999. The GeForce RTX 4060 costs 70.1% less ($700 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 65.4 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 36.0 (GeForce RTX 5080) — the GeForce RTX 4060 offers 81.7% better value. The GeForce RTX 5080 is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2023).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | GeForce RTX 5080 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $299-70% | $999 |
| Performance per Dollar | 65.4+82% | 36.0 |
| Codename | AD107 | GB203 |
| Release | May 18 2023 | January 30 2025 |
| Ranking | #84 | #5 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












