
GeForce RTX 3090
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 4060
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3090
2020Why buy it
- ✅+36% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅241.7% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (328 vs 96).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌401.3% HIGHER MSRP$1,499 MSRPvs$299 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 17.7 vs 65.4 G3D/$ ($1,499 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ❌204.3% higher power demand at 350W vs 115W.
GeForce RTX 4060
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,200 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 268.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 17.7 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 115W instead of 350W, a 235W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (19,548 vs 26,594).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (96 vs 328), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
GeForce RTX 3090
2020GeForce RTX 4060
2023Why buy it
- ✅+36% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅241.7% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (328 vs 96).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 8 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,200 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 268.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 17.7 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 115W instead of 350W, a 235W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌401.3% HIGHER MSRP$1,499 MSRPvs$299 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 17.7 vs 65.4 G3D/$ ($1,499 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ❌204.3% higher power demand at 350W vs 115W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (19,548 vs 26,594).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (96 vs 328), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3090 better than GeForce RTX 4060?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce RTX 4060 make more sense than GeForce RTX 3090?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3090 | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 328 FPS | 167 FPS |
| medium | 313 FPS | 152 FPS |
| high | 259 FPS | 134 FPS |
| ultra | 203 FPS | 115 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 313 FPS | 137 FPS |
| medium | 262 FPS | 114 FPS |
| high | 202 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 161 FPS | 90 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 181 FPS | 86 FPS |
| medium | 149 FPS | 74 FPS |
| high | 106 FPS | 62 FPS |
| ultra | 94 FPS | 55 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3090 | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 702 FPS | 392 FPS |
| medium | 599 FPS | 334 FPS |
| high | 472 FPS | 268 FPS |
| ultra | 413 FPS | 211 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 500 FPS | 240 FPS |
| medium | 420 FPS | 209 FPS |
| high | 331 FPS | 169 FPS |
| ultra | 276 FPS | 137 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 242 FPS | 119 FPS |
| medium | 201 FPS | 98 FPS |
| high | 167 FPS | 82 FPS |
| ultra | 141 FPS | 63 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3090 | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 999 FPS | 812 FPS |
| medium | 957 FPS | 642 FPS |
| high | 798 FPS | 551 FPS |
| ultra | 598 FPS | 440 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 898 FPS | 535 FPS |
| medium | 718 FPS | 443 FPS |
| high | 598 FPS | 379 FPS |
| ultra | 449 FPS | 329 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 569 FPS | 365 FPS |
| medium | 479 FPS | 297 FPS |
| high | 399 FPS | 234 FPS |
| ultra | 299 FPS | 186 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3090 | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 904 FPS | 746 FPS |
| medium | 841 FPS | 613 FPS |
| high | 733 FPS | 536 FPS |
| ultra | 598 FPS | 440 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 707 FPS | 594 FPS |
| medium | 658 FPS | 486 FPS |
| high | 570 FPS | 421 FPS |
| ultra | 449 FPS | 330 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 513 FPS | 358 FPS |
| medium | 479 FPS | 308 FPS |
| high | 399 FPS | 285 FPS |
| ultra | 299 FPS | 220 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3090 and GeForce RTX 4060

GeForce RTX 3090
GeForce RTX 3090
The GeForce RTX 3090 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1695 MHz. It has 10496 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 350W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 82 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,594 points. Launch price was $1,499.

GeForce RTX 4060
GeForce RTX 4060
The GeForce RTX 4060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1830 MHz to 2460 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,548 points. Launch price was $299.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3090 scores 26,594 versus the GeForce RTX 4060's 19,548 — the GeForce RTX 3090 leads by 36%. The GeForce RTX 3090 is built on Ampere while the GeForce RTX 4060 uses Ada Lovelace, both on 8 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 10,496 (GeForce RTX 3090) vs 3,072 (GeForce RTX 4060). Raw compute: 35.58 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3090) vs 15.11 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060). Boost clocks: 1695 MHz vs 2460 MHz. Ray tracing: 82 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3090) vs 24 (GeForce RTX 4060) with 328 Tensor cores vs 96.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3090 | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 26,594+36% | 19,548 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 10496+242% | 3072 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 35.58 TFLOPS+135% | 15.11 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1695 MHz | 2460 MHz+45% |
| ROPs | 112+133% | 48 |
| TMUs | 328+242% | 96 |
| L1 Cache | 10.3 MB+243% | 3 MB |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB | 24 MB+300% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 82+242% | 24 |
| Tensor Cores | 328+242% | 96 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce RTX 3090 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 supports the newer DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce RTX 3090 is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3090 | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3090 comes with 24 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4060 has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 3090 offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 936 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3090) vs 272 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060) — a 244.1% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3090. Bus width: 384-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 6 MB (GeForce RTX 3090) vs 24 MB (GeForce RTX 4060) — the GeForce RTX 4060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3090 | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 24 GB+200% | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 936 GB/s+244% | 272 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+200% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB | 24 MB+300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3090) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3090 | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3090) vs NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4060). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs NVDEC 5th gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 3090) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3090 | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th gen | NVENC 8th gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | NVDEC 5th gen |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3090 draws 350W versus the GeForce RTX 4060's 115W — a 101.1% difference. The GeForce RTX 4060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 750W (GeForce RTX 3090) vs 550W (GeForce RTX 4060). Power connectors: 2x 8-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 312mm vs 240mm, occupying 3 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 73°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3090 | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 350W | 115W-67% |
| Recommended PSU | 750W | 550W-27% |
| Power Connector | 2x 8-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 312mm | 240mm |
| Height | 140mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 3 | 2-33% |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 73°C-14% |
| Perf/Watt | 76.0 | 170.0+124% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3090 launched at $1499 MSRP, while the GeForce RTX 4060 launched at $299. The GeForce RTX 4060 costs 80.1% less ($1200 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 17.7 (GeForce RTX 3090) vs 65.4 (GeForce RTX 4060) — the GeForce RTX 4060 offers 269.5% better value. The GeForce RTX 4060 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2020).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3090 | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1499 | $299-80% |
| Performance per Dollar | 17.7 | 65.4+269% |
| Codename | GA102 | AD107 |
| Release | September 1 2020 | May 18 2023 |
| Ranking | #37 | #84 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












