
GeForce RTX 4060
Popular choices:

RTX 4000 Ada Generation
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4060
2023Why buy it
- ✅6.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $1,700 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 443.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 12.0 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅Measures 240mm instead of 267mm, a 27mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (19,548 vs 24,046).
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (96 vs 192), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌64.3% higher power demand at 115W vs 70W.
RTX 4000 Ada Generation
2023Why buy it
- ✅+23% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅100% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (192 vs 96).
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 115W, a 45W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌568.6% HIGHER MSRP$1,999 MSRPvs$299 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 12.0 vs 65.4 G3D/$ ($1,999 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ❌11.3% longer card at 267mm vs 240mm.
GeForce RTX 4060
2023RTX 4000 Ada Generation
2023Why buy it
- ✅6.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $1,700 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 443.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 12.0 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅Measures 240mm instead of 267mm, a 27mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅+23% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅100% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (192 vs 96).
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 115W, a 45W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (19,548 vs 24,046).
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (96 vs 192), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌64.3% higher power demand at 115W vs 70W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌568.6% HIGHER MSRP$1,999 MSRPvs$299 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 12.0 vs 65.4 G3D/$ ($1,999 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ❌11.3% longer card at 267mm vs 240mm.
Quick Answers
So, is RTX 4000 Ada Generation better than GeForce RTX 4060?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce RTX 4060 make more sense than RTX 4000 Ada Generation?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | RTX 4000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 167 FPS | 123 FPS |
| medium | 152 FPS | 115 FPS |
| high | 134 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 115 FPS | 83 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 137 FPS | 102 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 89 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 72 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 63 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 86 FPS | 56 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 50 FPS |
| high | 62 FPS | 39 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 36 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | RTX 4000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 392 FPS | 495 FPS |
| medium | 334 FPS | 418 FPS |
| high | 268 FPS | 328 FPS |
| ultra | 211 FPS | 283 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 240 FPS | 338 FPS |
| medium | 209 FPS | 279 FPS |
| high | 169 FPS | 227 FPS |
| ultra | 137 FPS | 190 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 165 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 138 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 63 FPS | 97 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | RTX 4000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 812 FPS | 549 FPS |
| medium | 642 FPS | 468 FPS |
| high | 551 FPS | 396 FPS |
| ultra | 440 FPS | 333 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 434 FPS |
| medium | 443 FPS | 367 FPS |
| high | 379 FPS | 315 FPS |
| ultra | 329 FPS | 260 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 365 FPS | 271 FPS |
| medium | 297 FPS | 225 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 187 FPS |
| ultra | 186 FPS | 149 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | RTX 4000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 746 FPS | 401 FPS |
| medium | 613 FPS | 332 FPS |
| high | 536 FPS | 301 FPS |
| ultra | 440 FPS | 277 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 594 FPS | 313 FPS |
| medium | 486 FPS | 261 FPS |
| high | 421 FPS | 236 FPS |
| ultra | 330 FPS | 214 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 358 FPS | 179 FPS |
| medium | 308 FPS | 156 FPS |
| high | 285 FPS | 142 FPS |
| ultra | 220 FPS | 123 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 and RTX 4000 Ada Generation

GeForce RTX 4060
GeForce RTX 4060
The GeForce RTX 4060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1830 MHz to 2460 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,548 points. Launch price was $299.

RTX 4000 Ada Generation
RTX 4000 Ada Generation
The RTX 4000 Ada Generation is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 9 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 24,046 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 scores 19,548 versus the RTX 4000 Ada Generation's 24,046 — the RTX 4000 Ada Generation leads by 23%. The GeForce RTX 4060 is built on Ada Lovelace while the RTX 4000 Ada Generation uses Ada Lovelace, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 3,072 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 6,144 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation). Raw compute: 15.11 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 26.73 TFLOPS (RTX 4000 Ada Generation). Boost clocks: 2460 MHz vs 1560 MHz. Ray tracing: 24 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 48 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation) with 96 Tensor cores vs 192.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | RTX 4000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 19,548 | 24,046+23% |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 3072 | 6144+100% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 15.11 TFLOPS | 26.73 TFLOPS+77% |
| Boost Clock | 2460 MHz+58% | 1560 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 64+33% |
| TMUs | 96 | 192+100% |
| L1 Cache | 3 MB | 6 MB+100% |
| L2 Cache | 24 MB | 48 MB+100% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 24 | 48+100% |
| Tensor Cores | 96 | 192+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
Both cards support modern Frame Generation technology, allowing them to insert intermediate frames to smooth motion and boost perceived FPS in supported games.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | RTX 4000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4060 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the RTX 4000 Ada Generation has 2 GB. The GeForce RTX 4060 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 272 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 360 GB/s (RTX 4000 Ada Generation) — a 32.4% advantage for the RTX 4000 Ada Generation. Bus width: 128-bit vs 160-bit. L2 Cache: 24 MB (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 48 MB (RTX 4000 Ada Generation) — the RTX 4000 Ada Generation has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | RTX 4000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+300% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 ECC |
| Memory Bandwidth | 272 GB/s | 360 GB/s+32% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 160-bit+25% |
| L2 Cache | 24 MB | 48 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 12.2 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | RTX 4000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 8th Gen NVENC (3x) (RTX 4000 Ada Generation). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | RTX 4000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 8th gen | 8th Gen NVENC (3x) |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 draws 115W versus the RTX 4000 Ada Generation's 70W — a 48.6% difference. The RTX 4000 Ada Generation is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 750W (RTX 4000 Ada Generation). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 1x 8-pin. Card length: 240mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 73°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | RTX 4000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 115W | 70W-39% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W-27% | 750W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 1x 8-pin |
| Length | 240mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 73°C-9% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 170.0 | 343.5+102% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4060 launched at $299 MSRP, while the RTX 4000 Ada Generation launched at $1999. The GeForce RTX 4060 costs 85% less ($1700 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 65.4 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 12.0 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation) — the GeForce RTX 4060 offers 445% better value.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | RTX 4000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $299-85% | $1999 |
| Performance per Dollar | 65.4+445% | 12.0 |
| Codename | AD107 | AD104 |
| Release | May 18 2023 | August 9 2023 |
| Ranking | #84 | #47 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












