
GeForce RTX 4060
Popular choices:

RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4060
2023Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (96 vs 160), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌15% higher power demand at 115W vs 100W.
RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
2023Why buy it
- ✅9.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅66.7% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (160 vs 96).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 115W, a 15W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 65.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 4060
2023RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
2023Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅9.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅66.7% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (160 vs 96).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 115W, a 15W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (96 vs 160), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌15% higher power demand at 115W vs 100W.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 65.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU better than GeForce RTX 4060?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce RTX 4060 make more sense than RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 167 FPS | 143 FPS |
| medium | 152 FPS | 124 FPS |
| high | 134 FPS | 109 FPS |
| ultra | 115 FPS | 77 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 137 FPS | 114 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 95 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 76 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 53 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 86 FPS | 51 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 44 FPS |
| high | 62 FPS | 33 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 28 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 392 FPS | 379 FPS |
| medium | 334 FPS | 327 FPS |
| high | 268 FPS | 265 FPS |
| ultra | 211 FPS | 230 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 240 FPS | 282 FPS |
| medium | 209 FPS | 236 FPS |
| high | 169 FPS | 190 FPS |
| ultra | 137 FPS | 156 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 132 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 95 FPS |
| ultra | 63 FPS | 72 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 812 FPS | 826 FPS |
| medium | 642 FPS | 680 FPS |
| high | 551 FPS | 590 FPS |
| ultra | 440 FPS | 442 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 628 FPS |
| medium | 443 FPS | 510 FPS |
| high | 379 FPS | 442 FPS |
| ultra | 329 FPS | 332 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 365 FPS | 406 FPS |
| medium | 297 FPS | 324 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 268 FPS |
| ultra | 186 FPS | 212 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 746 FPS | 301 FPS |
| medium | 613 FPS | 260 FPS |
| high | 536 FPS | 217 FPS |
| ultra | 440 FPS | 190 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 594 FPS | 239 FPS |
| medium | 486 FPS | 211 FPS |
| high | 421 FPS | 177 FPS |
| ultra | 330 FPS | 151 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 358 FPS | 142 FPS |
| medium | 308 FPS | 121 FPS |
| high | 285 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 220 FPS | 79 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 and RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

GeForce RTX 4060
GeForce RTX 4060
The GeForce RTX 4060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1830 MHz to 2460 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,548 points. Launch price was $299.

RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
The RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 21 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1110 MHz to 1545 MHz. It has 5120 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,656 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 4060 scores 19,548 and the RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU reaches 19,656 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 4060 is built on Ada Lovelace while the RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU uses Ada Lovelace, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 3,072 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 5,120 (RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU). Raw compute: 15.11 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 15.82 TFLOPS (RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU). Boost clocks: 2460 MHz vs 1545 MHz. Ray tracing: 24 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 40 (RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) with 96 Tensor cores vs 160.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 19,548 | 19,656 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 3072 | 5120+67% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 15.11 TFLOPS | 15.82 TFLOPS+5% |
| Boost Clock | 2460 MHz+59% | 1545 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 64+33% |
| TMUs | 96 | 160+67% |
| L1 Cache | 3 MB | 5 MB+67% |
| L2 Cache | 24 MB | 48 MB+100% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 24 | 40+67% |
| Tensor Cores | 96 | 160+67% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 4060 is capped at DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4060 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU has 12 GB. The RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 272 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 432 GB/s (RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) — a 58.8% advantage for the RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU. Bus width: 128-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 24 MB (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 48 MB (RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) — the RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 12 GB+50% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 272 GB/s | 432 GB/s+59% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 192-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 24 MB | 48 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 12 Ultimate (RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4060) vs NVENC 8th gen (RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs NVDEC 5th gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 8th gen | NVENC 8th gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | NVDEC 5th gen |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 draws 115W versus the RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU's 100W — a 14% difference. The RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 150W (RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU). Power connectors: 8-pin vs Mobile. Typical load temperature: 73°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 115W | 100W-13% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 150W-73% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | Mobile |
| Length | 240mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 73°C-9% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 170.0 | 196.6+16% |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












