
GeForce GTX 960
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 3060
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 960
2015Why buy it
- ✅Costs $130 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 170W, a 70W reduction.
- ✅Measures 241mm instead of 242mm, a 1mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (6,133 vs 16,995).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 30.8 vs 51.7 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3060
2021Why buy it
- ✅+177.1% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 67.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 51.7 vs 30.8 G3D/$ ($329 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌70% higher power demand at 170W vs 100W.
GeForce GTX 960
2015GeForce RTX 3060
2021Why buy it
- ✅Costs $130 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 170W, a 70W reduction.
- ✅Measures 241mm instead of 242mm, a 1mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅+177.1% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 67.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 51.7 vs 30.8 G3D/$ ($329 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (6,133 vs 16,995).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 30.8 vs 51.7 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌70% higher power demand at 170W vs 100W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3060 better than GeForce GTX 960?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 960 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 960 | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 103 FPS | 149 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 72 FPS | 118 FPS |
| ultra | 42 FPS | 99 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 90 FPS | 126 FPS |
| medium | 77 FPS | 104 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 32 FPS | 80 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 28 FPS | 67 FPS |
| medium | 26 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 18 FPS | 39 FPS |
| ultra | 15 FPS | 32 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 960 | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 139 FPS | 354 FPS |
| medium | 109 FPS | 310 FPS |
| high | 88 FPS | 249 FPS |
| ultra | 53 FPS | 195 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 222 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 196 FPS |
| high | 42 FPS | 160 FPS |
| ultra | 28 FPS | 128 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 27 FPS | 110 FPS |
| medium | 19 FPS | 94 FPS |
| high | 16 FPS | 77 FPS |
| ultra | 11 FPS | 60 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 960 | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 276 FPS | 765 FPS |
| medium | 221 FPS | 612 FPS |
| high | 184 FPS | 510 FPS |
| ultra | 138 FPS | 382 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 207 FPS | 535 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 432 FPS |
| high | 138 FPS | 366 FPS |
| ultra | 103 FPS | 287 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 138 FPS | 367 FPS |
| medium | 110 FPS | 298 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 221 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 176 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 960 | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 168 FPS | 523 FPS |
| medium | 139 FPS | 452 FPS |
| high | 125 FPS | 383 FPS |
| ultra | 101 FPS | 319 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 428 FPS |
| medium | 99 FPS | 371 FPS |
| high | 89 FPS | 298 FPS |
| ultra | 70 FPS | 245 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 68 FPS | 279 FPS |
| medium | 55 FPS | 259 FPS |
| high | 45 FPS | 225 FPS |
| ultra | 32 FPS | 186 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 960 and GeForce RTX 3060

GeForce GTX 960
GeForce GTX 960
The GeForce GTX 960 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 22 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1127 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,133 points. Launch price was $199.

GeForce RTX 3060
GeForce RTX 3060
The GeForce RTX 3060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1320 MHz to 1777 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,995 points. Launch price was $329.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 960 scores 6,133 versus the GeForce RTX 3060's 16,995 — the GeForce RTX 3060 leads by 177.1%. The GeForce GTX 960 is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the GeForce RTX 3060 uses Ampere, both on 28 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (GeForce GTX 960) vs 3,584 (GeForce RTX 3060). Raw compute: 2.413 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 960) vs 12.74 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060). Boost clocks: 1178 MHz vs 1777 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 960 | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,133 | 16,995+177% |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 1024 | 3584+250% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.413 TFLOPS | 12.74 TFLOPS+428% |
| Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | 1777 MHz+51% |
| ROPs | 32 | 48+50% |
| TMUs | 64 | 112+75% |
| L1 Cache | 0.38 MB | 3.5 MB+821% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 3 MB+200% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3060 supports the newer DLSS 2 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce GTX 960 is capped at Upscaling support.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 960 | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 2 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 960 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3060 has 12 GB. The GeForce RTX 3060 offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 112 GB/s (GeForce GTX 960) vs 360 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3060) — a 221.4% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3060. Bus width: 128-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 960) vs 3 MB (GeForce RTX 3060) — the GeForce RTX 3060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 960 | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 12 GB+200% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 112 GB/s | 360 GB/s+221% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 192-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 3 MB+200% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 960) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3060). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 960 | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce GTX 960) vs NVENC 7th Gen (GeForce RTX 3060). Decoder: NVDEC (2nd Gen) vs NVDEC 5th Gen. Supported codecs: HEVC,H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,VP8 (GeForce GTX 960) vs AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3060).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 960 | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (5th Gen) | NVENC 7th Gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC (2nd Gen) | NVDEC 5th Gen |
| Codecs | HEVC,H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,VP8 | AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 960 draws 100W versus the GeForce RTX 3060's 170W — a 51.9% difference. The GeForce GTX 960 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 960) vs 550W (GeForce RTX 3060). Power connectors: 6-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 241mm vs 242mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 C vs 75.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 960 | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W-41% | 170W |
| Recommended PSU | 400W-27% | 550W |
| Power Connector | 6-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 241mm | 242mm |
| Height | 111mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75 C | 75 |
| Perf/Watt | 61.3 | 100.0+63% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 960 launched at $199 MSRP, while the GeForce RTX 3060 launched at $329. The GeForce GTX 960 costs 39.5% less ($130 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 30.8 (GeForce GTX 960) vs 51.7 (GeForce RTX 3060) — the GeForce RTX 3060 offers 67.9% better value. The GeForce RTX 3060 is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 960 | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $199-40% | $329 |
| Performance per Dollar | 30.8 | 51.7+68% |
| Codename | GM206 | GA106 |
| Release | January 22 2015 | January 12 2021 |
| Ranking | #393 | #114 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













