
Radeon RX 7800M
Popular choices:

RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon RX 7800M
2024Why buy it
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
- ❌56.5% higher power demand at 180W vs 115W.
RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
2023Why buy it
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Draws 115W instead of 180W, a 65W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
Radeon RX 7800M
2024RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
2023Why buy it
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Draws 115W instead of 180W, a 65W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
- ❌56.5% higher power demand at 180W vs 115W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon RX 7800M better than RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon RX 7800M | RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 215 FPS | 167 FPS |
| medium | 196 FPS | 153 FPS |
| high | 172 FPS | 132 FPS |
| ultra | 133 FPS | 116 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 180 FPS | 139 FPS |
| medium | 147 FPS | 116 FPS |
| high | 128 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 90 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 94 FPS | 90 FPS |
| medium | 78 FPS | 76 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 60 FPS |
| ultra | 51 FPS | 54 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon RX 7800M | RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 452 FPS | 393 FPS |
| medium | 384 FPS | 339 FPS |
| high | 313 FPS | 275 FPS |
| ultra | 276 FPS | 227 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 344 FPS | 259 FPS |
| medium | 286 FPS | 214 FPS |
| high | 230 FPS | 181 FPS |
| ultra | 191 FPS | 148 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 169 FPS | 123 FPS |
| medium | 141 FPS | 106 FPS |
| high | 116 FPS | 89 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 68 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon RX 7800M | RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 719 FPS | 713 FPS |
| medium | 575 FPS | 571 FPS |
| high | 480 FPS | 475 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 357 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 539 FPS | 535 FPS |
| medium | 432 FPS | 428 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 357 FPS |
| ultra | 270 FPS | 267 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 357 FPS |
| medium | 288 FPS | 285 FPS |
| high | 240 FPS | 238 FPS |
| ultra | 180 FPS | 178 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon RX 7800M | RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 687 FPS | 644 FPS |
| medium | 575 FPS | 552 FPS |
| high | 480 FPS | 475 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 357 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 525 FPS | 535 FPS |
| medium | 432 FPS | 428 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 357 FPS |
| ultra | 270 FPS | 267 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 330 FPS |
| medium | 288 FPS | 285 FPS |
| high | 240 FPS | 238 FPS |
| ultra | 180 FPS | 178 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 7800M and RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

Radeon RX 7800M
Radeon RX 7800M
The Radeon RX 7800M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in September 11 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1295 MHz to 2335 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,984 points.

RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
The RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 21 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 2000 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 36 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,848 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon RX 7800M scores 15,984 and the RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU reaches 15,848 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 7800M is built on RDNA 3.0 while the RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU uses Ada Lovelace, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 3,840 (Radeon RX 7800M) vs 4,608 (RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU). Raw compute: 35.87 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7800M) vs 15.62 TFLOPS (RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU). Boost clocks: 2335 MHz vs 2000 MHz. Ray tracing: 60 RT cores (Radeon RX 7800M) vs 36 (RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) vs 144.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7800M | RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 15,984 | 15,848 |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 3840 | 4608+20% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 35.87 TFLOPS+130% | 15.62 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2335 MHz+17% | 2000 MHz |
| ROPs | 96+100% | 48 |
| TMUs | 240+67% | 144 |
| L1 Cache | 0.75 MB | 4.5 MB+500% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 32 MB+700% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 60+67% | 36 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 7800M is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 7800M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7800M | RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 3 | DLSS 2 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon RX 7800M comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU has 8 GB. The Radeon RX 7800M offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 432 GB/s (Radeon RX 7800M) vs 256 GB/s (RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) — a 68.8% advantage for the Radeon RX 7800M. Bus width: 192-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon RX 7800M) vs 32 MB (RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) — the RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7800M | RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB+50% | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 432 GB/s+69% | 256 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+50% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 32 MB+700% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon RX 7800M) vs 12.2 (RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7800M | RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 7800M) vs 8th Gen NVENC (RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU). Decoder: VCN 4.0 vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 7800M) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU).
| Feature | Radeon RX 7800M | RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 4.0 | 8th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | VCN 4.0 | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 7800M draws 180W versus the RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU's 115W — a 44.1% difference. The RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Radeon RX 7800M) vs 650W (RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7800M | RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W | 115W-36% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 650W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 0mm |
| Height | 0mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 80°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 88.8 | 137.8+55% |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













