Radeon 760M vs RTX A400

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Radeon 760M

2024

Why buy it

✅Draws 15W instead of 50W, a 35W reduction.
✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (5,449 vs 5,983).
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 44.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $135 MSRP).

RTX A400

2024

Why buy it

✅+9.8% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($135 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌233.3% higher power demand at 50W vs 15W.

Radeon 760M

2024

RTX A400

2024

Why buy it

✅Draws 15W instead of 50W, a 35W reduction.
✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Why buy it

✅+9.8% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($135 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (5,449 vs 5,983).
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 44.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $135 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌233.3% higher power demand at 50W vs 15W.

Quick Answers

So, is RTX A400 better than Radeon 760M?

Yes. RTX A400 is the better GPU overall here. You are getting 9.8% higher PassMark G3D performance.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon 760M is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting better upscaling support with FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack and a 4nm process instead of 8nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

RTX A400 is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. RTX A400 is priced in an unclear MSRP range at $135 MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 9.8% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 100+%. Radeon 760M is the more forward-looking alternative, so it still has a real case if you care more about lower power draw (15W vs 50W) and future-proofing than about squeezing out the strongest gaming value today.

When does Radeon 760M make more sense than RTX A400?

Yes. Radeon 760M is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is lower power draw (15W vs 50W), future-proofing, and staying closer to an unclear MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of RTX A400. The trade-off is that RTX A400 currently gives you 9.8% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 100+%.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Radeon 760M Benchmark Check

RTX A400 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Radeon 760M	RTX A400
1080p
low	46 FPS	36 FPS
medium	29 FPS	25 FPS
high	21 FPS	18 FPS
ultra	12 FPS	10 FPS
1440p
low	32 FPS	29 FPS
medium	19 FPS	18 FPS
high	11 FPS	10 FPS
ultra	6 FPS	5 FPS
4K
low	12 FPS	10 FPS
medium	8 FPS	7 FPS
high	5 FPS	4 FPS
ultra	3 FPS	3 FPS

Open Radeon 760M Open RTX A400

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Radeon 760M	RTX A400
1080p
low	91 FPS	73 FPS
medium	64 FPS	48 FPS
high	44 FPS	32 FPS
ultra	30 FPS	22 FPS
1440p
low	58 FPS	46 FPS
medium	38 FPS	25 FPS
high	29 FPS	19 FPS
ultra	21 FPS	14 FPS
4K
low	30 FPS	23 FPS
medium	21 FPS	14 FPS
high	17 FPS	11 FPS
ultra	11 FPS	8 FPS

Open Radeon 760M Open RTX A400

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Radeon 760M	RTX A400
1080p
low	245 FPS	269 FPS
medium	196 FPS	215 FPS
high	163 FPS	179 FPS
ultra	123 FPS	135 FPS
1440p
low	184 FPS	202 FPS
medium	147 FPS	162 FPS
high	123 FPS	135 FPS
ultra	92 FPS	101 FPS
4K
low	123 FPS	126 FPS
medium	98 FPS	108 FPS
high	77 FPS	78 FPS
ultra	53 FPS	55 FPS

Open Radeon 760M Open RTX A400

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Radeon 760M	RTX A400
1080p
low	154 FPS	147 FPS
medium	120 FPS	117 FPS
high	103 FPS	99 FPS
ultra	81 FPS	79 FPS
1440p
low	109 FPS	108 FPS
medium	87 FPS	87 FPS
high	74 FPS	74 FPS
ultra	58 FPS	58 FPS
4K
low	65 FPS	63 FPS
medium	52 FPS	50 FPS
high	42 FPS	40 FPS
ultra	30 FPS	29 FPS

Open Radeon 760M Open RTX A400

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon 760M and RTX A400

Radeon 760M

The Radeon 760M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 31 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 800 MHz to 2599 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 8 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,449 points.

RTX A400

The RTX A400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 16 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 727 MHz to 1762 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 6 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,983 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Radeon 760M scores 5,449 versus the RTX A400's 5,983 — the RTX A400 leads by 9.8%. The Radeon 760M is built on RDNA 3.0 while the RTX A400 uses Ampere, both on 4 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 512 (Radeon 760M) vs 768 (RTX A400). Raw compute: 5.323 TFLOPS (Radeon 760M) vs 2.706 TFLOPS (RTX A400). Boost clocks: 2599 MHz vs 1762 MHz. Ray tracing: 8 RT cores (Radeon 760M) vs 6 (RTX A400) vs 24.

Feature	Radeon 760M	RTX A400
G3D Mark Score	5,449	5,983+10%
Architecture	RDNA 3.0	Ampere
Process Node	4 nm	8 nm
Shading Units	512	768+50%
Compute (TFLOPS)	5.323 TFLOPS+97%	2.706 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2599 MHz+48%	1762 MHz
ROPs	16	16
TMUs	32+33%	24
Ray Tracing Cores	8+33%	6

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The RTX A400 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon 760M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	Radeon 760M	RTX A400
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: System vs 128-bit.

Feature	Radeon 760M	RTX A400
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	Shared	GDDR6
Bus Width	System	128-bit

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon 760M draws 15W versus the RTX A400's 50W — a 107.7% difference. The Radeon 760M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon 760M) vs 350W (RTX A400). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.