Radeon 760M vs Radeon Pro WX 5100

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Radeon 760M

2024

Why buy it

✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 15W instead of 75W, a 60W reduction.
✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 11.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $499 MSRP).

Radeon Pro WX 5100

2016

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 11.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅97.6% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).

Trade-offs

❌Very weak future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌400% higher power demand at 75W vs 15W.

Radeon 760M

2024

Radeon Pro WX 5100

2016

Why buy it

✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 15W instead of 75W, a 60W reduction.
✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 11.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅97.6% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 11.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $499 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Very weak future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌400% higher power demand at 75W vs 15W.

Quick Answers

So, is Radeon Pro WX 5100 better than Radeon 760M?

Yes. Radeon Pro WX 5100 is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 5,500 vs 5,449 in G3D Mark. On top of that, Radeon Pro WX 5100 is a 2016 card with FSR upscaling, while Radeon 760M is a 2024 model from an older generation with FSR upscaling. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon 760M is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2024 generation instead of 2016, 100.0% more ray-tracing hardware, and a 4nm process instead of 14nm. That makes it the safer long-run choice for modern games.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

Radeon Pro WX 5100 can still make sense if you find it at the right price, especially around $499 MSRP. Radeon Pro WX 5100 is still the smarter buy for most people, though, because the raw performance is close while the overall package is cleaner. Radeon Pro WX 5100 is priced in an unclear MSRP range at $499 MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 0.9% higher G3D Mark. Radeon 760M is the newer 2024 card, so it still has a real case if you care more about newer architecture, lower power draw (15W vs 75W), and future-proofing than about squeezing out the strongest gaming value today.

When does Radeon 760M make more sense than Radeon Pro WX 5100?

Yes. Radeon 760M is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (15W vs 75W), future-proofing, and staying closer to an unclear MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of Radeon Pro WX 5100. The trade-off is that Radeon Pro WX 5100 currently gives you 0.9% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 100+%.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Radeon 760M Benchmark Check

Radeon Pro WX 5100 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Radeon 760M	Radeon Pro WX 5100
1080p
low	46 FPS	101 FPS
medium	29 FPS	85 FPS
high	21 FPS	71 FPS
ultra	12 FPS	47 FPS
1440p
low	32 FPS	87 FPS
medium	19 FPS	73 FPS
high	11 FPS	53 FPS
ultra	6 FPS	35 FPS
4K
low	12 FPS	35 FPS
medium	8 FPS	32 FPS
high	5 FPS	19 FPS
ultra	3 FPS	16 FPS

Open Radeon 760M Open Radeon Pro WX 5100

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Radeon 760M	Radeon Pro WX 5100
1080p
low	87 FPS	111 FPS
medium	61 FPS	85 FPS
high	42 FPS	63 FPS
ultra	29 FPS	45 FPS
1440p
low	56 FPS	79 FPS
medium	36 FPS	58 FPS
high	28 FPS	45 FPS
ultra	20 FPS	33 FPS
4K
low	29 FPS	41 FPS
medium	21 FPS	32 FPS
high	16 FPS	25 FPS
ultra	11 FPS	18 FPS

Open Radeon 760M Open Radeon Pro WX 5100

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Radeon 760M	Radeon Pro WX 5100
1080p
low	245 FPS	248 FPS
medium	196 FPS	198 FPS
high	163 FPS	165 FPS
ultra	123 FPS	124 FPS
1440p
low	184 FPS	186 FPS
medium	147 FPS	148 FPS
high	123 FPS	124 FPS
ultra	92 FPS	93 FPS
4K
low	123 FPS	124 FPS
medium	98 FPS	99 FPS
high	77 FPS	82 FPS
ultra	53 FPS	62 FPS

Open Radeon 760M Open Radeon Pro WX 5100

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Radeon 760M	Radeon Pro WX 5100
1080p
low	154 FPS	225 FPS
medium	120 FPS	193 FPS
high	103 FPS	157 FPS
ultra	81 FPS	124 FPS
1440p
low	109 FPS	174 FPS
medium	87 FPS	148 FPS
high	74 FPS	119 FPS
ultra	58 FPS	93 FPS
4K
low	65 FPS	97 FPS
medium	52 FPS	77 FPS
high	42 FPS	61 FPS
ultra	30 FPS	48 FPS

Open Radeon 760M Open Radeon Pro WX 5100

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon 760M and Radeon Pro WX 5100

Radeon 760M

The Radeon 760M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 31 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 800 MHz to 2599 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 8 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,449 points.

Radeon Pro WX 5100

The Radeon Pro WX 5100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 18 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 713 MHz to 1086 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,500 points. Launch price was $499.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon 760M scores 5,449 and the Radeon Pro WX 5100 reaches 5,500 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon 760M is built on RDNA 3.0 while the Radeon Pro WX 5100 uses GCN 4.0, both on 4 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 512 (Radeon 760M) vs 1,792 (Radeon Pro WX 5100). Raw compute: 5.323 TFLOPS (Radeon 760M) vs 3.892 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 5100). Boost clocks: 2599 MHz vs 1086 MHz.

Feature	Radeon 760M	Radeon Pro WX 5100
G3D Mark Score	5,449	5,500
Architecture	RDNA 3.0	GCN 4.0
Process Node	4 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	512	1792+250%
Compute (TFLOPS)	5.323 TFLOPS+37%	3.892 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2599 MHz+139%	1086 MHz
ROPs	16	32+100%
TMUs	32	112+250%
L1 Cache	128 KB	448 KB+250%
L2 Cache	2 MB	2 MB
Frame Generation	FSR upscaling + RSR	FSR upscaling

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon 760M	Radeon Pro WX 5100
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon 760M comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro WX 5100 has 8 GB. The Radeon Pro WX 5100 offers 97.6% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 128-bit.

Feature	Radeon 760M	Radeon Pro WX 5100
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	7.906 GB+98%
Memory Type	Shared	GDDR6
Bus Width	System	128-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB	2 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_2) (Radeon 760M) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon Pro WX 5100). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	Radeon 760M	Radeon Pro WX 5100
DirectX	12 (12_2)	12 (12_0)
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCN 4.0 (Radeon 760M) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon Pro WX 5100). Decoder: VCN 4.0 vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 (Radeon 760M) vs H.264,HEVC (Radeon Pro WX 5100).

Feature	Radeon 760M	Radeon Pro WX 5100
Encoder	VCN 4.0	VCE 3.4
Decoder	VCN 4.0	UVD 6.3
Codecs	H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9	H.264,HEVC

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon 760M draws 15W versus the Radeon Pro WX 5100's 75W — a 133.3% difference. The Radeon 760M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon 760M) vs 350W (Radeon Pro WX 5100). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 82°C.

Feature	Radeon 760M	Radeon Pro WX 5100
TDP	15W-80%	75W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	None	PCIe-powered
Length	—	173mm
Height	—	69mm
Slots	0-100%	1
Temp (Load)	80°C-2%	82°C
Perf/Watt	363.3+396%	73.3