
Radeon 760M
Popular choices:

Tesla K80
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon 760M
2024Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 300W, a 285W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 1.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $5,000 MSRP).
Tesla K80
2014Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($5,000 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌1900% higher power demand at 300W vs 15W.
Radeon 760M
2024Tesla K80
2014Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 300W, a 285W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($5,000 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 1.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $5,000 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌1900% higher power demand at 300W vs 15W.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon 760M better than Tesla K80?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Tesla K80 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon 760M | Tesla K80 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 46 FPS | 100 FPS |
| medium | 29 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 21 FPS | 69 FPS |
| ultra | 12 FPS | 41 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 32 FPS | 87 FPS |
| medium | 19 FPS | 77 FPS |
| high | 11 FPS | 55 FPS |
| ultra | 6 FPS | 32 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 12 FPS | 28 FPS |
| medium | 8 FPS | 27 FPS |
| high | 5 FPS | 18 FPS |
| ultra | 3 FPS | 15 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon 760M | Tesla K80 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 91 FPS | 153 FPS |
| medium | 64 FPS | 116 FPS |
| high | 44 FPS | 89 FPS |
| ultra | 30 FPS | 69 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 58 FPS | 109 FPS |
| medium | 38 FPS | 79 FPS |
| high | 29 FPS | 65 FPS |
| ultra | 21 FPS | 48 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 30 FPS | 55 FPS |
| medium | 21 FPS | 41 FPS |
| high | 17 FPS | 34 FPS |
| ultra | 11 FPS | 25 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon 760M | Tesla K80 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 245 FPS | 241 FPS |
| medium | 196 FPS | 193 FPS |
| high | 163 FPS | 161 FPS |
| ultra | 123 FPS | 121 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 184 FPS | 181 FPS |
| medium | 147 FPS | 145 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 121 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 91 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 123 FPS | 121 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 97 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 80 FPS |
| ultra | 53 FPS | 60 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon 760M | Tesla K80 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 154 FPS | 180 FPS |
| medium | 120 FPS | 144 FPS |
| high | 103 FPS | 125 FPS |
| ultra | 81 FPS | 94 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 109 FPS | 125 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 102 FPS |
| high | 74 FPS | 90 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 66 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 65 FPS | 74 FPS |
| medium | 52 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 42 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 30 FPS | 31 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon 760M and Tesla K80

Radeon 760M
Radeon 760M
The Radeon 760M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 31 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 800 MHz to 2599 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 8 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,449 points.

Tesla K80
Tesla K80
The Tesla K80 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 17 2014. It features the Kepler 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 562 MHz to 824 MHz. It has 2496 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,363 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon 760M scores 5,449 and the Tesla K80 reaches 5,363 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon 760M is built on RDNA 3.0 while the Tesla K80 uses Kepler 2.0, both on 4 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 512 (Radeon 760M) vs 2,496 (Tesla K80). Raw compute: 5.323 TFLOPS (Radeon 760M) vs 4.113 TFLOPS ×2 (Tesla K80). Boost clocks: 2599 MHz vs 824 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon 760M | Tesla K80 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,449+2% | 5,363 |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | Kepler 2.0 |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 512 | 2496 ×2+388% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.323 TFLOPS+29% | 4.113 TFLOPS ×2 |
| Boost Clock | 2599 MHz+215% | 824 MHz |
| ROPs | 16 | 48 ×2+200% |
| TMUs | 32 | 208 ×2+550% |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | 208 KB+63% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+33% | 1.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon 760M | Tesla K80 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: System vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon 760M) vs 1.5 MB (Tesla K80) — the Radeon 760M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon 760M | Tesla K80 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | System | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+33% | 1.5 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon 760M draws 15W versus the Tesla K80's 300W — a 181% difference. The Radeon 760M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon 760M) vs 350W (Tesla K80). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon 760M | Tesla K80 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-95% | 300W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 363.3+1930% | 17.9 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon 760M is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2014).
| Feature | Radeon 760M | Tesla K80 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $5000 |
| Codename | Phoenix | GK210 |
| Release | January 31 2024 | November 17 2014 |
| Ranking | #421 | #419 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













