
Radeon 760M
Popular choices:

Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon 760M
2024Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 50W, a 35W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 37.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire
2011Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 37.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2011-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌233.3% higher power demand at 50W vs 15W.
Radeon 760M
2024Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire
2011Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 50W, a 35W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 37.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 37.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2011-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌233.3% higher power demand at 50W vs 15W.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire better than Radeon 760M?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon 760M make more sense than Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon 760M | Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 46 FPS | 39 FPS |
| medium | 29 FPS | 33 FPS |
| high | 21 FPS | 23 FPS |
| ultra | 12 FPS | 15 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 32 FPS | 32 FPS |
| medium | 19 FPS | 24 FPS |
| high | 11 FPS | 15 FPS |
| ultra | 6 FPS | 10 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 12 FPS | 11 FPS |
| medium | 8 FPS | 10 FPS |
| high | 5 FPS | 6 FPS |
| ultra | 3 FPS | 5 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon 760M | Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 87 FPS | 61 FPS |
| medium | 61 FPS | 40 FPS |
| high | 42 FPS | 30 FPS |
| ultra | 29 FPS | 19 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 56 FPS | 35 FPS |
| medium | 36 FPS | 20 FPS |
| high | 28 FPS | 14 FPS |
| ultra | 20 FPS | 10 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 29 FPS | 12 FPS |
| medium | 21 FPS | 7 FPS |
| high | 16 FPS | 6 FPS |
| ultra | 11 FPS | 4 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon 760M | Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 245 FPS | 254 FPS |
| medium | 196 FPS | 203 FPS |
| high | 163 FPS | 169 FPS |
| ultra | 123 FPS | 127 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 184 FPS | 190 FPS |
| medium | 147 FPS | 152 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 127 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 95 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 123 FPS | 127 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 101 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 85 FPS |
| ultra | 53 FPS | 61 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon 760M | Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 154 FPS | 109 FPS |
| medium | 120 FPS | 85 FPS |
| high | 103 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 81 FPS | 38 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 109 FPS | 67 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 49 FPS |
| high | 74 FPS | 36 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 25 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 65 FPS | 35 FPS |
| medium | 52 FPS | 25 FPS |
| high | 42 FPS | 19 FPS |
| ultra | 30 FPS | 13 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon 760M and Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire

Radeon 760M
Radeon 760M
The Radeon 760M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 31 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 800 MHz to 2599 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 8 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,449 points.

Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire
Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire
The Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 6 2011. It features the Terascale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 680 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,637 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon 760M scores 5,449 and the Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire reaches 5,637 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon 760M is built on RDNA 3.0 while the Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire uses Terascale 2, both on 4 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 512 (Radeon 760M) vs 1,920 (Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire).
| Feature | Radeon 760M | Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,449 | 5,637+3% |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | Terascale 2 |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 512 | 1920+275% |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling + RSR | FSR upscaling |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon 760M | Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: System vs 256-bit x2.
| Feature | Radeon 760M | Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | 115.2 GB/s x2 |
| Bus Width | System | 256-bit x2 |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_2) (Radeon 760M) vs 11_0 (Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | Radeon 760M | Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_2)+9% | 11_0 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 4.0 (Radeon 760M) vs UVD 3 (Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire). Decoder: VCN 4.0 vs UVD 3.
| Feature | Radeon 760M | Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 4.0 | UVD 3 |
| Decoder | VCN 4.0 | UVD 3 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon 760M draws 15W versus the Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire's 50W — a 107.7% difference. The Radeon 760M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon 760M) vs 350W (Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire). Power connectors: None vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | Radeon 760M | Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-70% | 50W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | — | 1mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 363.3+222% | 112.7 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon 760M is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2011).
| Feature | Radeon 760M | Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $150 |
| Codename | Phoenix | Blackcomb XT |
| Release | January 31 2024 | January 6 2011 |
| Ranking | #421 | #537 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













