Radeon X1650 Pro vs nForce 750a SLI

AMD

Radeon X1650 Pro

Popular choices:

RTX 4060β€’RTX 3060β€’RTX 4060 Tiβ€’RTX 3070β€’GTX 1650β€’RTX 3060 Tiβ€’RTX 4070β€’RTX 3050
VS

nForce 750a SLI

Popular choices:

RTX 4060β€’RTX 3060β€’RTX 4060 Tiβ€’RTX 3070β€’GTX 1650β€’RTX 3060 Tiβ€’RTX 4070β€’RTX 3050

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark Score

85

G3D Mark Score

83

Performance Difference

Radeon X1650 Pro is 2.4% faster than nForce 750a SLI

VRAM & Game Performance

VRAM (Video RAM) is dedicated memory on your graphics card that stores textures, frame buffers, and game assets. Higher VRAM allows for sharper textures at high resolutions (1440p/4K) and prevents stuttering in modern AAA games. 8GB is minimum for 1080p, 12GB+ recommended for 1440p, and 16GB+ for 4K gaming.

Radeon X1650 Pro512 MB
016GB32GB
1080pLimited
10%
low10%
medium10%
high10%
ultra10%
1440pLimited
10%
low10%
medium10%
high10%
ultra10%
4KLimited
10%
low10%
medium10%
high10%
ultra10%

πŸ“Š Performance Analysis

1 GB VRAM Β· 85 G3D Mark (entry-level)

1080pLimited. Older/lighter games only.
1440pNot recommended. Use 1080p.
4KNot viable. Use lower resolution or heavy upscaling.

⚑Ray Tracing: RT not recommended. Keep disabled for playable FPS.

πŸš€Upscaling: Performance mode: +50-70% FPS, noticeable quality loss.

nForce 750a SLIN/A
016GB32GB
VRAM data unavailable

Benchmarks & Performance Comparison

In this GPU comparison, Radeon X1650 Pro performs 2.4% better in benchmarks. Below you'll find detailed performance analysis, gaming benchmarks, power consumption data, and specifications to help you decide between Radeon X1650 Pro and nForce 750a SLI.

Both graphics cards are popular choices for gaming. When comparing GPUs, consider VRAM capacity, ray tracing performance, power requirements, and price-to-performance ratio for your target gaming resolution (1080p, 1440p, or 4K).

Technical Specifications

Detailed hardware specifications for Radeon X1650 Pro and nForce 750a SLI

AMD

Radeon X1650 Pro

The Radeon X1650 Pro is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 17 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. Boost clock: 2581 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 85 points. Launch price was $549.

Technical Specifications

ROPs:64
TMUs:160
Vram:512 MB
Boost Clock:2581 MHz
Shading Units:2560
Transistor Count:17,200 million
Texture Fill Rate:413.0
Manufacturing Process:7 nm
Power Consumption (TDP):250 Watt

General Information

Codename:Navi 22
Architecture:RDNA 2.0 (2020βˆ’2025)
Launch Price:$549
Release Date:October 17 2023
Performance Ranking Position:92

nForce 750a SLI

The nForce 750a SLI is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in April 1 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. Core clock: 967 MHz. It has 768 shading units. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 83 points.

Technical Specifications

Vram:null
Core Clock:967 MHz
Shading Units:768
Transistor Count:1300 Million
Manufacturing Process:28 nm

General Information

Codename:N14P-GT
Architecture:Kepler (2012βˆ’2018)
Release Date:April 1 2013
Performance Ranking Position:616

Top Performing GPUs

The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores

You May Also Compare

Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon X1650 Pro and nForce 750a SLI