GeForce RTX 4060 vs Radeon TM

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 4060

2023

Why buy it

✅153.5% more average FPS across 43 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌666.7% higher power demand at 115W vs 15W.

Radeon TM

2024

Why buy it

✅Draws 15W instead of 115W, a 100W reduction.
✅More future proof: RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 across 43 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 65.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $299 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 4060

2023

Radeon TM

2024

Why buy it

✅153.5% more average FPS across 43 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Why buy it

✅Draws 15W instead of 115W, a 100W reduction.
✅More future proof: RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌666.7% higher power demand at 115W vs 15W.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 across 43 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 65.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $299 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 4060 better than Radeon TM?

Yes. GeForce RTX 4060 is clearly the better overall GPU here. GeForce RTX 4060 averages 153.5% more FPS across 43 tracked games in our benchmark data. You are also looking at 19,548 vs 5,564 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce RTX 4060 is a 2023 card with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, while Radeon TM is a 2024 model from an older generation with FSR upscaling. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 4060 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 251.3% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 8 GB instead of 4 GB, and better frame-generation support with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023) instead of FSR upscaling. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 4060 is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. GeForce RTX 4060 is priced in an unclear MSRP range at $299 MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 153.5% more estimated average FPS across 43 tracked games in our benchmark data and 251.3% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 100+%. Radeon TM is the newer 2024 card, so it still has a real case if you care more about newer architecture and lower power draw (15W vs 115W) than about squeezing out the strongest gaming value today.

When does Radeon TM make more sense than GeForce RTX 4060?

Yes. Radeon TM is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (15W vs 115W), and staying closer to an unclear MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of GeForce RTX 4060. The trade-off is that GeForce RTX 4060 currently gives you 251.3% higher G3D Mark and 153.5% more estimated average FPS across 43 tracked games in our benchmark data. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 100+%.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 4060 Benchmark Check

Radeon TM Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060	Radeon TM
1080p
low	167 FPS	93 FPS
medium	152 FPS	78 FPS
high	134 FPS	65 FPS
ultra	115 FPS	43 FPS
1440p
low	137 FPS	80 FPS
medium	114 FPS	68 FPS
high	99 FPS	51 FPS
ultra	90 FPS	32 FPS
4K
low	86 FPS	30 FPS
medium	74 FPS	28 FPS
high	62 FPS	19 FPS
ultra	55 FPS	17 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Open Radeon TM

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060	Radeon TM
1080p
low	392 FPS	126 FPS
medium	334 FPS	88 FPS
high	268 FPS	63 FPS
ultra	211 FPS	45 FPS
1440p
low	240 FPS	90 FPS
medium	209 FPS	60 FPS
high	169 FPS	44 FPS
ultra	137 FPS	32 FPS
4K
low	119 FPS	38 FPS
medium	98 FPS	28 FPS
high	82 FPS	22 FPS
ultra	63 FPS	15 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Open Radeon TM

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060	Radeon TM
1080p
low	812 FPS	250 FPS
medium	642 FPS	200 FPS
high	551 FPS	167 FPS
ultra	440 FPS	125 FPS
1440p
low	535 FPS	188 FPS
medium	443 FPS	150 FPS
high	379 FPS	125 FPS
ultra	329 FPS	94 FPS
4K
low	365 FPS	125 FPS
medium	297 FPS	100 FPS
high	234 FPS	83 FPS
ultra	186 FPS	60 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Open Radeon TM

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060	Radeon TM
1080p
low	746 FPS	172 FPS
medium	613 FPS	135 FPS
high	536 FPS	112 FPS
ultra	440 FPS	89 FPS
1440p
low	594 FPS	118 FPS
medium	486 FPS	96 FPS
high	421 FPS	81 FPS
ultra	330 FPS	64 FPS
4K
low	358 FPS	71 FPS
medium	308 FPS	56 FPS
high	285 FPS	44 FPS
ultra	220 FPS	33 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Open Radeon TM

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 and Radeon TM

GeForce RTX 4060

The GeForce RTX 4060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1830 MHz to 2460 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,548 points. Launch price was $299.

Radeon TM

The Radeon TM is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 15 2024. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 2900 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,564 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 scores 19,548 versus the Radeon TM's 5,564 — the GeForce RTX 4060 leads by 251.3%. The GeForce RTX 4060 is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon TM uses RDNA 3.5, both on 5 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 1,024 (Radeon TM). Raw compute: 15.11 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 5.939 TFLOPS (Radeon TM). Boost clocks: 2460 MHz vs 2900 MHz. Ray tracing: 24 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 16 (Radeon TM) with 96 Tensor cores.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060	Radeon TM
G3D Mark Score	19,548+251%	5,564
Architecture	Ada Lovelace	RDNA 3.5
Process Node	5 nm	4 nm
Shading Units	3072+200%	1024
Compute (TFLOPS)	15.11 TFLOPS+154%	5.939 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2460 MHz	2900 MHz+18%
ROPs	48+50%	32
TMUs	96+50%	64
L1 Cache	3 MB+1100%	0.25 MB
L2 Cache	24 MB+1100%	2 MB
Ray Tracing Cores	24+50%	16

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon TM lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon TM relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060	Radeon TM
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	Yes (DLSS 3.5)	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 4060 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon TM has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 4060 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 24 MB (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 2 MB (Radeon TM) — the GeForce RTX 4060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060	Radeon TM
VRAM Capacity	8 GB+100%	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	24 MB+1100%	2 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4060 draws 115W versus the Radeon TM's 15W — a 153.8% difference. The Radeon TM is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 350W (Radeon TM). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060	Radeon TM
TDP	115W	15W-87%
Recommended PSU	550W	350W-36%
Power Connector	8-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	240mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	—
Temp (Load)	73°C	—
Perf/Watt	170.0	370.9+118%