Radeon PRO W6300 vs Radeon TM

AMD

Radeon PRO W6300

2022Core: 1512 MHzBoost: 2040 MHz

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Radeon TM

2024Core: 400 MHzBoost: 2900 MHz

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Radeon PRO W6300

2022

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 27.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($200 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon TM is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
  • 66.7% higher power demand at 25W vs 15W.

Radeon TM

2024

Why buy it

  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
  • More future proof: RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
  • Draws 15W instead of 25W, a 10W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 27.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $200 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Radeon TM better than Radeon PRO W6300?
Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 5,560 vs 5,564 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer Radeon TM is the overall package: you are getting a newer generation, FSR upscaling, plus much lower power draw (15W vs 25W).
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon TM is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2024 generation instead of 2022, more VRAM at 4 GB instead of 2 GB, 33.3% more ray-tracing hardware, and a 4nm process instead of 6nm. That extra memory headroom makes it the safer pick for newer games, heavier textures, and higher settings over time.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Radeon PRO W6300 can still make sense if you find it at the right price, especially around $200 MSRP. Radeon TM is still the smarter buy for most people, though, because the raw performance is close while the overall package is cleaner. Radeon TM is priced in an unclear MSRP range at an unclear MSRP versus $200 MSRP, and you are getting 0.1% higher G3D Mark. Moving to an unclear MSRP gets you newer hardware, lower power draw (15W vs 25W), and FSR upscaling.
Is Radeon PRO W6300 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Yes. Radeon PRO W6300 is still a strong gaming card in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. Price is really the swing factor here. If you find it at or below $200 MSRP, it remains a very sensible buy. Radeon TM is still the safer recommendation for most fresh builds because it offers a cleaner overall package with newer hardware and FSR upscaling.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetRadeon PRO W6300Radeon TM
1080p
low126 FPS93 FPS
medium111 FPS78 FPS
high93 FPS65 FPS
ultra69 FPS43 FPS
1440p
low110 FPS80 FPS
medium92 FPS68 FPS
high75 FPS51 FPS
ultra56 FPS32 FPS
4K
low47 FPS30 FPS
medium43 FPS28 FPS
high31 FPS19 FPS
ultra28 FPS17 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetRadeon PRO W6300Radeon TM
1080p
low165 FPS126 FPS
medium131 FPS88 FPS
high97 FPS63 FPS
ultra65 FPS45 FPS
1440p
low107 FPS90 FPS
medium81 FPS60 FPS
high60 FPS44 FPS
ultra44 FPS32 FPS
4K
low55 FPS38 FPS
medium41 FPS28 FPS
high32 FPS22 FPS
ultra21 FPS15 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetRadeon PRO W6300Radeon TM
1080p
low250 FPS250 FPS
medium200 FPS200 FPS
high167 FPS167 FPS
ultra125 FPS125 FPS
1440p
low188 FPS188 FPS
medium150 FPS150 FPS
high125 FPS125 FPS
ultra94 FPS94 FPS
4K
low125 FPS125 FPS
medium100 FPS100 FPS
high83 FPS83 FPS
ultra63 FPS60 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetRadeon PRO W6300Radeon TM
1080p
low250 FPS172 FPS
medium200 FPS135 FPS
high167 FPS112 FPS
ultra125 FPS89 FPS
1440p
low188 FPS118 FPS
medium150 FPS96 FPS
high125 FPS81 FPS
ultra94 FPS64 FPS
4K
low109 FPS71 FPS
medium82 FPS56 FPS
high70 FPS44 FPS
ultra53 FPS33 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon PRO W6300 and Radeon TM

AMD

Radeon PRO W6300

The Radeon PRO W6300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 19 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1512 MHz to 2040 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,560 points.

AMD

Radeon TM

The Radeon TM is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 15 2024. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 2900 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,564 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon PRO W6300 scores 5,560 and the Radeon TM reaches 5,564 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon PRO W6300 is built on RDNA 2.0 while the Radeon TM uses RDNA 3.5, both on 6 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 768 (Radeon PRO W6300) vs 1,024 (Radeon TM). Raw compute: 3.133 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W6300) vs 5.939 TFLOPS (Radeon TM). Boost clocks: 2040 MHz vs 2900 MHz. Ray tracing: 12 RT cores (Radeon PRO W6300) vs 16 (Radeon TM).

FeatureRadeon PRO W6300Radeon TM
G3D Mark Score
5,560
5,564
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
RDNA 3.5
Process Node
6 nm
4 nm
Shading Units
768
1024+33%
Compute (TFLOPS)
3.133 TFLOPS
5.939 TFLOPS+90%
Boost Clock
2040 MHz
2900 MHz+42%
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
48
64+33%
L1 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
L2 Cache
1 MB
2 MB+100%
Frame Generation
FSR upscaling + RSR
FSR upscaling + RSR
Ray Tracing Cores
12
16+33%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon PRO W6300Radeon TM
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon PRO W6300 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon TM has 4 GB. The Radeon TM offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon PRO W6300) vs 2 MB (Radeon TM) — the Radeon TM has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon PRO W6300Radeon TM
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
4 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB
2 MB+100%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon PRO W6300 draws 25W versus the Radeon TM's 15W — a 50% difference. The Radeon TM is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon PRO W6300) vs 350W (Radeon TM). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureRadeon PRO W6300Radeon TM
TDP
25W
15W-40%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Perf/Watt
222.4
370.9+67%
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon TM is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2022).

FeatureRadeon PRO W6300Radeon TM
MSRP
$200
Codename
Navi 24
Strix Point
Release
January 19 2022
July 15 2024
Ranking
#413
#312