
Radeon PRO W6300
Popular choices:

Radeon R9 285 / 380
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon PRO W6300
2022Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 25W instead of 190W, a 165W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌0.5% HIGHER MSRP$200 MSRPvs$199 MSRP
Radeon R9 285 / 380
2014Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌660% higher power demand at 190W vs 25W.
Radeon PRO W6300
2022Radeon R9 285 / 380
2014Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 25W instead of 190W, a 165W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌0.5% HIGHER MSRP$200 MSRPvs$199 MSRP
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌660% higher power demand at 190W vs 25W.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon PRO W6300 better than Radeon R9 285 / 380?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon R9 285 / 380 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon PRO W6300 | Radeon R9 285 / 380 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 101 FPS | 80 FPS |
| medium | 89 FPS | 65 FPS |
| high | 75 FPS | 52 FPS |
| ultra | 62 FPS | 34 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 89 FPS | 67 FPS |
| medium | 75 FPS | 56 FPS |
| high | 61 FPS | 40 FPS |
| ultra | 51 FPS | 25 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 43 FPS | 25 FPS |
| medium | 40 FPS | 23 FPS |
| high | 29 FPS | 15 FPS |
| ultra | 26 FPS | 13 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon PRO W6300 | Radeon R9 285 / 380 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 160 FPS | 129 FPS |
| medium | 127 FPS | 98 FPS |
| high | 94 FPS | 78 FPS |
| ultra | 62 FPS | 52 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 106 FPS | 73 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 53 FPS |
| high | 60 FPS | 39 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 27 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 54 FPS | 27 FPS |
| medium | 41 FPS | 19 FPS |
| high | 32 FPS | 15 FPS |
| ultra | 21 FPS | 11 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon PRO W6300 | Radeon R9 285 / 380 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 250 FPS | 250 FPS |
| medium | 200 FPS | 200 FPS |
| high | 167 FPS | 166 FPS |
| ultra | 125 FPS | 125 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 188 FPS | 187 FPS |
| medium | 150 FPS | 150 FPS |
| high | 125 FPS | 125 FPS |
| ultra | 94 FPS | 94 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 125 FPS | 125 FPS |
| medium | 100 FPS | 100 FPS |
| high | 83 FPS | 83 FPS |
| ultra | 56 FPS | 62 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon PRO W6300 | Radeon R9 285 / 380 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 250 FPS | 139 FPS |
| medium | 193 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 167 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 125 FPS | 80 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 188 FPS | 103 FPS |
| medium | 144 FPS | 85 FPS |
| high | 125 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 94 FPS | 57 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 101 FPS | 61 FPS |
| medium | 75 FPS | 47 FPS |
| high | 65 FPS | 36 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 26 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon PRO W6300 and Radeon R9 285 / 380

Radeon PRO W6300
Radeon PRO W6300
The Radeon PRO W6300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 19 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1512 MHz to 2040 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,560 points.

Radeon R9 285 / 380
Radeon R9 285 / 380
The Radeon R9 285 / 380 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in September 2 2014. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 918 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 190W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,550 points. Launch price was $249.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon PRO W6300 scores 5,560 and the Radeon R9 285 / 380 reaches 5,550 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon PRO W6300 is built on RDNA 2.0 while the Radeon R9 285 / 380 uses GCN 3.0, both on 6 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 768 (Radeon PRO W6300) vs 1,792 (Radeon R9 285 / 380). Raw compute: 3.133 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W6300) vs 3.29 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 285 / 380).
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6300 | Radeon R9 285 / 380 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,560 | 5,550 |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 1792+133% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.133 TFLOPS | 3.29 TFLOPS+5% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 48 | 112+133% |
| L1 Cache | 256 KB | 448 KB+75% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 0.5 MB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling + RSR | FSR upscaling |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6300 | Radeon R9 285 / 380 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of video memory. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon PRO W6300) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon R9 285 / 380) — the Radeon PRO W6300 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6300 | Radeon R9 285 / 380 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 0.5 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon PRO W6300 draws 25W versus the Radeon R9 285 / 380's 190W — a 153.5% difference. The Radeon PRO W6300 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon PRO W6300) vs 500W (Radeon R9 285 / 380). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 6-pin.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6300 | Radeon R9 285 / 380 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 25W-87% | 190W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-30% | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 2x 6-pin |
| Length | — | 221mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Perf/Watt | 222.4+662% | 29.2 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon PRO W6300 launched at $200 MSRP, while the Radeon R9 285 / 380 launched at $199. The Radeon R9 285 / 380 costs 0.5% less ($1 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 27.8 (Radeon PRO W6300) vs 27.9 (Radeon R9 285 / 380) — the Radeon R9 285 / 380 offers 0.4% better value. The Radeon PRO W6300 is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2014).
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6300 | Radeon R9 285 / 380 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $200 | $199 |
| Performance per Dollar | 27.8 | 27.9 |
| Codename | Navi 24 | Tonga |
| Release | January 19 2022 | September 2 2014 |
| Ranking | #413 | #365 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












