Radeon PRO W6300 vs Radeon R9 285 / 380

AMD

Radeon PRO W6300

2022Core: 1512 MHzBoost: 2040 MHz

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Radeon R9 285 / 380

2014Core: 918 MHz

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Radeon PRO W6300

2022

Why buy it

  • More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
  • Draws 25W instead of 190W, a 165W reduction.
  • More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • 0.5% HIGHER MSRP
    $200 MSRPvs$199 MSRP

Radeon R9 285 / 380

2014

Why buy it

  • Costs $1 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
  • 660% higher power demand at 190W vs 25W.

Quick Answers

So, is Radeon PRO W6300 better than Radeon R9 285 / 380?
Yes. Radeon PRO W6300 is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 5,560 vs 5,550 in G3D Mark. On top of that, Radeon PRO W6300 is a 2022 card with FSR upscaling, while Radeon R9 285 / 380 is a 2014 model from an older generation with FSR upscaling. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon PRO W6300 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2022 generation instead of 2014, 100.0% more ray-tracing hardware, and a 6nm process instead of 28nm. That makes it the safer long-run choice for modern games.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Radeon PRO W6300 is the smarter buy by a wide margin. Radeon PRO W6300 is about 0.5% more expensive on MSRP at $200 MSRP versus $199 MSRP, and you are getting 0.2% higher G3D Mark. Radeon R9 285 / 380 really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.
Is Radeon R9 285 / 380 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
No, not for a fresh gaming build. Radeon R9 285 / 380 is 2014 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM, 5,550 in G3D Mark, and FSR upscaling. That is simply too far behind to be an easy modern recommendation.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetRadeon PRO W6300Radeon R9 285 / 380
1080p
low101 FPS80 FPS
medium89 FPS65 FPS
high75 FPS52 FPS
ultra62 FPS34 FPS
1440p
low89 FPS67 FPS
medium75 FPS56 FPS
high61 FPS40 FPS
ultra51 FPS25 FPS
4K
low43 FPS25 FPS
medium40 FPS23 FPS
high29 FPS15 FPS
ultra26 FPS13 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetRadeon PRO W6300Radeon R9 285 / 380
1080p
low160 FPS129 FPS
medium127 FPS98 FPS
high94 FPS78 FPS
ultra62 FPS52 FPS
1440p
low106 FPS73 FPS
medium81 FPS53 FPS
high60 FPS39 FPS
ultra44 FPS27 FPS
4K
low54 FPS27 FPS
medium41 FPS19 FPS
high32 FPS15 FPS
ultra21 FPS11 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetRadeon PRO W6300Radeon R9 285 / 380
1080p
low250 FPS250 FPS
medium200 FPS200 FPS
high167 FPS166 FPS
ultra125 FPS125 FPS
1440p
low188 FPS187 FPS
medium150 FPS150 FPS
high125 FPS125 FPS
ultra94 FPS94 FPS
4K
low125 FPS125 FPS
medium100 FPS100 FPS
high83 FPS83 FPS
ultra56 FPS62 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetRadeon PRO W6300Radeon R9 285 / 380
1080p
low250 FPS139 FPS
medium193 FPS113 FPS
high167 FPS97 FPS
ultra125 FPS80 FPS
1440p
low188 FPS103 FPS
medium144 FPS85 FPS
high125 FPS73 FPS
ultra94 FPS57 FPS
4K
low101 FPS61 FPS
medium75 FPS47 FPS
high65 FPS36 FPS
ultra49 FPS26 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon PRO W6300 and Radeon R9 285 / 380

AMD

Radeon PRO W6300

The Radeon PRO W6300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 19 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1512 MHz to 2040 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,560 points.

AMD

Radeon R9 285 / 380

The Radeon R9 285 / 380 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in September 2 2014. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 918 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 190W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,550 points. Launch price was $249.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon PRO W6300 scores 5,560 and the Radeon R9 285 / 380 reaches 5,550 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon PRO W6300 is built on RDNA 2.0 while the Radeon R9 285 / 380 uses GCN 3.0, both on 6 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 768 (Radeon PRO W6300) vs 1,792 (Radeon R9 285 / 380). Raw compute: 3.133 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W6300) vs 3.29 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 285 / 380).

FeatureRadeon PRO W6300Radeon R9 285 / 380
G3D Mark Score
5,560
5,550
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
GCN 3.0
Process Node
6 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
768
1792+133%
Compute (TFLOPS)
3.133 TFLOPS
3.29 TFLOPS+5%
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
48
112+133%
L1 Cache
256 KB
448 KB+75%
L2 Cache
1 MB+100%
0.5 MB
Frame Generation
FSR upscaling + RSR
FSR upscaling

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon PRO W6300Radeon R9 285 / 380
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 2 GB of video memory. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon PRO W6300) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon R9 285 / 380) — the Radeon PRO W6300 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon PRO W6300Radeon R9 285 / 380
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit
256-bit+100%
L2 Cache
1 MB+100%
0.5 MB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon PRO W6300 draws 25W versus the Radeon R9 285 / 380's 190W — a 153.5% difference. The Radeon PRO W6300 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon PRO W6300) vs 500W (Radeon R9 285 / 380). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 6-pin.

FeatureRadeon PRO W6300Radeon R9 285 / 380
TDP
25W-87%
190W
Recommended PSU
350W-30%
500W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
2x 6-pin
Length
221mm
Height
111mm
Slots
2
Perf/Watt
222.4+662%
29.2
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon PRO W6300 launched at $200 MSRP, while the Radeon R9 285 / 380 launched at $199. The Radeon R9 285 / 380 costs 0.5% less ($1 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 27.8 (Radeon PRO W6300) vs 27.9 (Radeon R9 285 / 380) — the Radeon R9 285 / 380 offers 0.4% better value. The Radeon PRO W6300 is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2014).

FeatureRadeon PRO W6300Radeon R9 285 / 380
MSRP
$200
$199
Performance per Dollar
27.8
27.9
Codename
Navi 24
Tonga
Release
January 19 2022
September 2 2014
Ranking
#413
#365