
Radeon PRO W6300
Popular choices:

Radeon TM
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon PRO W6300
2022Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 27.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($200 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon TM is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌66.7% higher power demand at 25W vs 15W.
Radeon TM
2024Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 25W, a 10W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 27.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
Radeon PRO W6300
2022Radeon TM
2024Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 27.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($200 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 25W, a 10W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon TM is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌66.7% higher power demand at 25W vs 15W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 27.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon TM better than Radeon PRO W6300?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon PRO W6300 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon PRO W6300 | Radeon TM |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 126 FPS | 93 FPS |
| medium | 111 FPS | 78 FPS |
| high | 93 FPS | 65 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 43 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 110 FPS | 80 FPS |
| medium | 92 FPS | 68 FPS |
| high | 75 FPS | 51 FPS |
| ultra | 56 FPS | 32 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 47 FPS | 30 FPS |
| medium | 43 FPS | 28 FPS |
| high | 31 FPS | 19 FPS |
| ultra | 28 FPS | 17 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon PRO W6300 | Radeon TM |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 165 FPS | 126 FPS |
| medium | 131 FPS | 88 FPS |
| high | 97 FPS | 63 FPS |
| ultra | 65 FPS | 45 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 107 FPS | 90 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 60 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 32 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 55 FPS | 38 FPS |
| medium | 41 FPS | 28 FPS |
| high | 32 FPS | 22 FPS |
| ultra | 21 FPS | 15 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon PRO W6300 | Radeon TM |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 250 FPS | 250 FPS |
| medium | 200 FPS | 200 FPS |
| high | 167 FPS | 167 FPS |
| ultra | 125 FPS | 125 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 188 FPS | 188 FPS |
| medium | 150 FPS | 150 FPS |
| high | 125 FPS | 125 FPS |
| ultra | 94 FPS | 94 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 125 FPS | 125 FPS |
| medium | 100 FPS | 100 FPS |
| high | 83 FPS | 83 FPS |
| ultra | 63 FPS | 60 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon PRO W6300 | Radeon TM |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 250 FPS | 172 FPS |
| medium | 200 FPS | 135 FPS |
| high | 167 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 125 FPS | 89 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 188 FPS | 118 FPS |
| medium | 150 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 125 FPS | 81 FPS |
| ultra | 94 FPS | 64 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 109 FPS | 71 FPS |
| medium | 82 FPS | 56 FPS |
| high | 70 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 53 FPS | 33 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon PRO W6300 and Radeon TM

Radeon PRO W6300
Radeon PRO W6300
The Radeon PRO W6300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 19 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1512 MHz to 2040 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,560 points.

Radeon TM
Radeon TM
The Radeon TM is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 15 2024. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 2900 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,564 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon PRO W6300 scores 5,560 and the Radeon TM reaches 5,564 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon PRO W6300 is built on RDNA 2.0 while the Radeon TM uses RDNA 3.5, both on 6 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 768 (Radeon PRO W6300) vs 1,024 (Radeon TM). Raw compute: 3.133 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W6300) vs 5.939 TFLOPS (Radeon TM). Boost clocks: 2040 MHz vs 2900 MHz. Ray tracing: 12 RT cores (Radeon PRO W6300) vs 16 (Radeon TM).
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6300 | Radeon TM |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,560 | 5,564 |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | RDNA 3.5 |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 1024+33% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.133 TFLOPS | 5.939 TFLOPS+90% |
| Boost Clock | 2040 MHz | 2900 MHz+42% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 48 | 64+33% |
| L1 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling + RSR | FSR upscaling + RSR |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 12 | 16+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6300 | Radeon TM |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon PRO W6300 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon TM has 4 GB. The Radeon TM offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon PRO W6300) vs 2 MB (Radeon TM) — the Radeon TM has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6300 | Radeon TM |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 4 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon PRO W6300 draws 25W versus the Radeon TM's 15W — a 50% difference. The Radeon TM is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon PRO W6300) vs 350W (Radeon TM). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6300 | Radeon TM |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 25W | 15W-40% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Perf/Watt | 222.4 | 370.9+67% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon TM is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2022).
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6300 | Radeon TM |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $200 | — |
| Codename | Navi 24 | Strix Point |
| Release | January 19 2022 | July 15 2024 |
| Ranking | #413 | #312 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












