
GeForce GTX 580
Popular choices:

Radeon Sky 500
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 580
2010Why buy it
- ✅8.1% more average FPS across 39 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $1 less on MSRP ($499 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (3 GB vs 2 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2010-era hardware with 3 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌62.7% higher power demand at 244W vs 150W.
Radeon Sky 500
2013Why buy it
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 244W, a 94W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 580 across 39 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 3 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
GeForce GTX 580
2010Radeon Sky 500
2013Why buy it
- ✅8.1% more average FPS across 39 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $1 less on MSRP ($499 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (3 GB vs 2 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 244W, a 94W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2010-era hardware with 3 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌62.7% higher power demand at 244W vs 150W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 580 across 39 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 3 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon Sky 500 better than GeForce GTX 580?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce GTX 580 make more sense than Radeon Sky 500?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 580 | Radeon Sky 500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 80 FPS | 80 FPS |
| medium | 65 FPS | 65 FPS |
| high | 52 FPS | 51 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 33 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 67 FPS | 67 FPS |
| medium | 55 FPS | 55 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 39 FPS |
| ultra | 25 FPS | 25 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 24 FPS | 24 FPS |
| medium | 23 FPS | 23 FPS |
| high | 15 FPS | 15 FPS |
| ultra | 13 FPS | 13 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 580 | Radeon Sky 500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 132 FPS | 119 FPS |
| medium | 103 FPS | 89 FPS |
| high | 81 FPS | 68 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 43 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 91 FPS | 66 FPS |
| medium | 65 FPS | 45 FPS |
| high | 52 FPS | 33 FPS |
| ultra | 39 FPS | 23 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 42 FPS | 24 FPS |
| medium | 32 FPS | 17 FPS |
| high | 29 FPS | 13 FPS |
| ultra | 23 FPS | 9 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 580 | Radeon Sky 500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 209 FPS | 213 FPS |
| medium | 167 FPS | 170 FPS |
| high | 139 FPS | 142 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 106 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 156 FPS | 159 FPS |
| medium | 125 FPS | 128 FPS |
| high | 104 FPS | 106 FPS |
| ultra | 78 FPS | 80 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 104 FPS | 106 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 85 FPS |
| high | 70 FPS | 71 FPS |
| ultra | 52 FPS | 53 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 580 | Radeon Sky 500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 157 FPS | 144 FPS |
| medium | 116 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 100 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 84 FPS | 80 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 118 FPS | 105 FPS |
| medium | 89 FPS | 85 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 56 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 70 FPS | 61 FPS |
| medium | 50 FPS | 46 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 36 FPS |
| ultra | 28 FPS | 25 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 580 and Radeon Sky 500

GeForce GTX 580
GeForce GTX 580
The GeForce GTX 580 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 9 2010. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 772 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 244W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,634 points. Launch price was $499.

Radeon Sky 500
Radeon Sky 500
The Radeon Sky 500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 27 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 950 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,723 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 580 scores 4,634 and the Radeon Sky 500 reaches 4,723 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 580 is built on Fermi 2.0 while the Radeon Sky 500 uses GCN 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 512 (GeForce GTX 580) vs 1,280 (Radeon Sky 500). Raw compute: 1.581 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 580) vs 2.432 TFLOPS (Radeon Sky 500).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 580 | Radeon Sky 500 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,634 | 4,723+2% |
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 512 | 1280+150% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.581 TFLOPS | 2.432 TFLOPS+54% |
| ROPs | 48+50% | 32 |
| TMUs | 64 | 80+25% |
| L1 Cache | 1 MB+223% | 0.31 MB |
| L2 Cache | 768 KB+50% | 512 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 580 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Sky 500 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 580 | Radeon Sky 500 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 580 comes with 3 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Sky 500 has 2 GB. The GeForce GTX 580 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 384-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 768 KB (GeForce GTX 580) vs 512 KB (Radeon Sky 500) — the GeForce GTX 580 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 580 | Radeon Sky 500 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 3 GB+50% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+500% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 768 KB+50% | 512 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 580 draws 244W versus the Radeon Sky 500's 150W — a 47.7% difference. The Radeon Sky 500 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce GTX 580) vs 350W (Radeon Sky 500). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 580 | Radeon Sky 500 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 244W | 150W-39% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 350W-36% |
| Power Connector | 6-pin + 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 85 C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 19.0 | 31.5+66% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 580 launched at $499 MSRP, while the Radeon Sky 500 launched at $500. The GeForce GTX 580 costs 0.2% less ($1 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 9.3 (GeForce GTX 580) vs 9.4 (Radeon Sky 500) — the Radeon Sky 500 offers 1.1% better value. The Radeon Sky 500 is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2010).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 580 | Radeon Sky 500 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $499 | $500 |
| Performance per Dollar | 9.3 | 9.4+1% |
| Codename | GF110 | Pitcairn |
| Release | November 9 2010 | March 27 2013 |
| Ranking | #458 | #455 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












