
FirePro S7000
Popular choices:

Radeon Sky 500
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
FirePro S7000
2012Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2012-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌149.8% HIGHER MSRP$1,249 MSRPvs$500 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 3.6 vs 9.4 G3D/$ ($1,249 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
Radeon Sky 500
2013Why buy it
- ✅Costs $749 less on MSRP ($500 MSRP vs $1,249 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 160.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.4 vs 3.6 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $1,249 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
FirePro S7000
2012Radeon Sky 500
2013Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $749 less on MSRP ($500 MSRP vs $1,249 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 160.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.4 vs 3.6 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $1,249 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2012-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌149.8% HIGHER MSRP$1,249 MSRPvs$500 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 3.6 vs 9.4 G3D/$ ($1,249 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon Sky 500 better than FirePro S7000?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does FirePro S7000 make more sense than Radeon Sky 500?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | FirePro S7000 | Radeon Sky 500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 103 FPS | 80 FPS |
| medium | 88 FPS | 65 FPS |
| high | 71 FPS | 51 FPS |
| ultra | 42 FPS | 33 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 90 FPS | 67 FPS |
| medium | 77 FPS | 55 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 39 FPS |
| ultra | 32 FPS | 25 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 28 FPS | 24 FPS |
| medium | 27 FPS | 23 FPS |
| high | 18 FPS | 15 FPS |
| ultra | 15 FPS | 13 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | FirePro S7000 | Radeon Sky 500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 119 FPS |
| medium | 101 FPS | 89 FPS |
| high | 80 FPS | 68 FPS |
| ultra | 51 FPS | 43 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 66 FPS |
| medium | 52 FPS | 45 FPS |
| high | 38 FPS | 33 FPS |
| ultra | 27 FPS | 23 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 28 FPS | 24 FPS |
| medium | 19 FPS | 17 FPS |
| high | 15 FPS | 13 FPS |
| ultra | 11 FPS | 9 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | FirePro S7000 | Radeon Sky 500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 204 FPS | 213 FPS |
| medium | 163 FPS | 170 FPS |
| high | 136 FPS | 142 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 106 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 153 FPS | 159 FPS |
| medium | 122 FPS | 128 FPS |
| high | 102 FPS | 106 FPS |
| ultra | 76 FPS | 80 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 102 FPS | 106 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 85 FPS |
| high | 68 FPS | 71 FPS |
| ultra | 51 FPS | 53 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | FirePro S7000 | Radeon Sky 500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 181 FPS | 144 FPS |
| medium | 146 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 128 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 80 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 127 FPS | 105 FPS |
| medium | 104 FPS | 85 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 67 FPS | 56 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 73 FPS | 61 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 46 FPS |
| high | 45 FPS | 36 FPS |
| ultra | 31 FPS | 25 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FirePro S7000 and Radeon Sky 500

FirePro S7000
FirePro S7000
The FirePro S7000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 27 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 950 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,524 points. Launch price was $1,249.

Radeon Sky 500
Radeon Sky 500
The Radeon Sky 500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 27 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 950 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,723 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro S7000 scores 4,524 and the Radeon Sky 500 reaches 4,723 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro S7000 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon Sky 500 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,280 (FirePro S7000) vs 1,280 (Radeon Sky 500). Raw compute: 2.432 TFLOPS (FirePro S7000) vs 2.432 TFLOPS (Radeon Sky 500).
| Feature | FirePro S7000 | Radeon Sky 500 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,524 | 4,723+4% |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1280 | 1280 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.432 TFLOPS | 2.432 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 80 | 80 |
| L1 Cache | 320 KB | 320 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro S7000 | Radeon Sky 500 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro S7000 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Sky 500 has 2 GB. The FirePro S7000 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | FirePro S7000 | Radeon Sky 500 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro S7000 draws 150W versus the Radeon Sky 500's 150W — a 0% difference. The Radeon Sky 500 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro S7000) vs 350W (Radeon Sky 500). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | FirePro S7000 | Radeon Sky 500 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 150W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 292mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 85 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 30.2 | 31.5+4% |
Value Analysis
The FirePro S7000 launched at $1249 MSRP, while the Radeon Sky 500 launched at $500. The Radeon Sky 500 costs 60% less ($749 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 3.6 (FirePro S7000) vs 9.4 (Radeon Sky 500) — the Radeon Sky 500 offers 161.1% better value. The Radeon Sky 500 is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2012).
| Feature | FirePro S7000 | Radeon Sky 500 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1249 | $500-60% |
| Performance per Dollar | 3.6 | 9.4+161% |
| Codename | Pitcairn | Pitcairn |
| Release | August 27 2012 | March 27 2013 |
| Ranking | #462 | #455 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













