FirePro S7000 vs Radeon Sky 500

FirePro S7000

2012Core: 950 MHz

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Radeon Sky 500

2013Core: 950 MHz

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

FirePro S7000

2012

Why buy it

  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).

Trade-offs

  • Very weak future-proofing: 2012-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
  • 149.8% HIGHER MSRP
    $1,249 MSRPvs$500 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 3.6 vs 9.4 G3D/$ ($1,249 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).

Radeon Sky 500

2013

Why buy it

  • Costs $749 less on MSRP ($500 MSRP vs $1,249 MSRP).
  • Delivers 160.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.4 vs 3.6 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $1,249 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.

Quick Answers

So, is Radeon Sky 500 better than FirePro S7000?
Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 4,524 vs 4,723 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer Radeon Sky 500 is the overall package: you are getting a newer generation, FSR upscaling.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
FirePro S7000 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more VRAM at 4 GB instead of 2 GB and the stronger feature stack with no meaningful modern upscaling stack instead of FSR upscaling. That extra memory headroom makes it the safer pick for newer games, heavier textures, and higher settings over time.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Radeon Sky 500 can still make sense if you find it at the right price, especially around $500 MSRP. Radeon Sky 500 is still the smarter buy for most people, though, because the raw performance is close while the overall package is cleaner. Radeon Sky 500 is about $749 cheaper on MSRP at $500 MSRP versus $1,249 MSRP, and you are getting 4.4% higher G3D Mark. FirePro S7000 is the more forward-looking alternative, so it still has a real case if you care more about future-proofing than about squeezing out the strongest gaming value today.
When does FirePro S7000 make more sense than Radeon Sky 500?
Yes. FirePro S7000 is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is future-proofing and staying closer to $1,249 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of Radeon Sky 500. The trade-off is that Radeon Sky 500 currently gives you 4.4% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 160.8%.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetFirePro S7000Radeon Sky 500
1080p
low103 FPS80 FPS
medium88 FPS65 FPS
high71 FPS51 FPS
ultra42 FPS33 FPS
1440p
low90 FPS67 FPS
medium77 FPS55 FPS
high56 FPS39 FPS
ultra32 FPS25 FPS
4K
low28 FPS24 FPS
medium27 FPS23 FPS
high18 FPS15 FPS
ultra15 FPS13 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetFirePro S7000Radeon Sky 500
1080p
low134 FPS119 FPS
medium101 FPS89 FPS
high80 FPS68 FPS
ultra51 FPS43 FPS
1440p
low77 FPS66 FPS
medium52 FPS45 FPS
high38 FPS33 FPS
ultra27 FPS23 FPS
4K
low28 FPS24 FPS
medium19 FPS17 FPS
high15 FPS13 FPS
ultra11 FPS9 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetFirePro S7000Radeon Sky 500
1080p
low204 FPS213 FPS
medium163 FPS170 FPS
high136 FPS142 FPS
ultra102 FPS106 FPS
1440p
low153 FPS159 FPS
medium122 FPS128 FPS
high102 FPS106 FPS
ultra76 FPS80 FPS
4K
low102 FPS106 FPS
medium81 FPS85 FPS
high68 FPS71 FPS
ultra51 FPS53 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetFirePro S7000Radeon Sky 500
1080p
low181 FPS144 FPS
medium146 FPS113 FPS
high128 FPS97 FPS
ultra100 FPS80 FPS
1440p
low127 FPS105 FPS
medium104 FPS85 FPS
high92 FPS73 FPS
ultra67 FPS56 FPS
4K
low73 FPS61 FPS
medium57 FPS46 FPS
high45 FPS36 FPS
ultra31 FPS25 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of FirePro S7000 and Radeon Sky 500

AMD

FirePro S7000

The FirePro S7000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 27 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 950 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,524 points. Launch price was $1,249.

AMD

Radeon Sky 500

The Radeon Sky 500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 27 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 950 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,723 points.

Graphics Performance

The FirePro S7000 scores 4,524 and the Radeon Sky 500 reaches 4,723 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro S7000 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon Sky 500 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,280 (FirePro S7000) vs 1,280 (Radeon Sky 500). Raw compute: 2.432 TFLOPS (FirePro S7000) vs 2.432 TFLOPS (Radeon Sky 500).

FeatureFirePro S7000Radeon Sky 500
G3D Mark Score
4,524
4,723+4%
Architecture
GCN 1.0
GCN 1.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
1280
1280
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.432 TFLOPS
2.432 TFLOPS
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
80
80
L1 Cache
320 KB
320 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
512 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureFirePro S7000Radeon Sky 500
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro S7000 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Sky 500 has 2 GB. The FirePro S7000 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.

FeatureFirePro S7000Radeon Sky 500
VRAM Capacity
4 GB+100%
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
512 KB
512 KB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro S7000 draws 150W versus the Radeon Sky 500's 150W — a 0% difference. The Radeon Sky 500 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro S7000) vs 350W (Radeon Sky 500). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureFirePro S7000Radeon Sky 500
TDP
150W
150W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
292mm
Height
111mm
Slots
1
Temp (Load)
85
Perf/Watt
30.2
31.5+4%
💰

Value Analysis

The FirePro S7000 launched at $1249 MSRP, while the Radeon Sky 500 launched at $500. The Radeon Sky 500 costs 60% less ($749 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 3.6 (FirePro S7000) vs 9.4 (Radeon Sky 500) — the Radeon Sky 500 offers 161.1% better value. The Radeon Sky 500 is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2012).

FeatureFirePro S7000Radeon Sky 500
MSRP
$1249
$500-60%
Performance per Dollar
3.6
9.4+161%
Codename
Pitcairn
Pitcairn
Release
August 27 2012
March 27 2013
Ranking
#462
#455