
Radeon R9 270 / R7 370
Popular choices:

Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon R9 270 / R7 370
2015Why buy it
- ✅Costs $301 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $450 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 204.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 28.6 vs 9.4 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $450 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 110W instead of 250W, a 140W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U
2020Why buy it
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than Radeon R9 270 / R7 370: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 is already obsolete for modern gaming.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌202% HIGHER MSRP$450 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 9.4 vs 28.6 G3D/$ ($450 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
- ❌127.3% higher power demand at 250W vs 110W.
Radeon R9 270 / R7 370
2015Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $301 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $450 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 204.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 28.6 vs 9.4 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $450 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 110W instead of 250W, a 140W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than Radeon R9 270 / R7 370: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 is already obsolete for modern gaming.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌202% HIGHER MSRP$450 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 9.4 vs 28.6 G3D/$ ($450 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
- ❌127.3% higher power demand at 250W vs 110W.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 better than Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U make more sense than Radeon R9 270 / R7 370?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 130 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 118 FPS |
| high | 49 FPS | 100 FPS |
| ultra | 32 FPS | 85 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 65 FPS | 107 FPS |
| medium | 53 FPS | 91 FPS |
| high | 37 FPS | 76 FPS |
| ultra | 23 FPS | 67 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 23 FPS | 60 FPS |
| medium | 22 FPS | 54 FPS |
| high | 14 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 12 FPS | 40 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 111 FPS | 190 FPS |
| medium | 82 FPS | 152 FPS |
| high | 63 FPS | 127 FPS |
| ultra | 38 FPS | 95 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 63 FPS | 143 FPS |
| medium | 42 FPS | 114 FPS |
| high | 31 FPS | 95 FPS |
| ultra | 20 FPS | 71 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 23 FPS | 95 FPS |
| medium | 15 FPS | 76 FPS |
| high | 12 FPS | 63 FPS |
| ultra | 8 FPS | 48 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 192 FPS | 190 FPS |
| medium | 153 FPS | 152 FPS |
| high | 128 FPS | 127 FPS |
| ultra | 96 FPS | 95 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 144 FPS | 143 FPS |
| medium | 115 FPS | 114 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 95 FPS |
| ultra | 72 FPS | 71 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 96 FPS | 95 FPS |
| medium | 77 FPS | 76 FPS |
| high | 64 FPS | 63 FPS |
| ultra | 48 FPS | 48 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 135 FPS | 190 FPS |
| medium | 108 FPS | 152 FPS |
| high | 94 FPS | 127 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 95 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 99 FPS | 143 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 114 FPS |
| high | 71 FPS | 95 FPS |
| ultra | 54 FPS | 71 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 58 FPS | 95 FPS |
| medium | 44 FPS | 76 FPS |
| high | 35 FPS | 63 FPS |
| ultra | 25 FPS | 48 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 and Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U

Radeon R9 270 / R7 370
Radeon R9 270 / R7 370
The Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 925 MHz to 975 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,260 points.


Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U
Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U
The Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 28 2020. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1700 MHz to 2105 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,225 points. Launch price was $579.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 scores 4,260 and the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U reaches 4,225 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U uses RDNA 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (Radeon R9 270 / R7 370) vs 3,840 (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U). Raw compute: 2.496 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 270 / R7 370) vs 16.17 TFLOPS (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U). Boost clocks: 975 MHz vs 2105 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,260 | 4,225 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 1280 | 3840+200% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.496 TFLOPS | 16.17 TFLOPS+548% |
| Boost Clock | 975 MHz | 2105 MHz+116% |
| ROPs | 32 | 96+200% |
| TMUs | 80 | 240+200% |
| L1 Cache | 384 KB | 768 KB+100% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 4 MB+700% |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling + RSR |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of video memory. Bus width: 256-bit vs System. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (Radeon R9 270 / R7 370) vs 4 MB (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U) — the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 179.2 GB/s | System |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 4 MB+700% |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 draws 110W versus the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U's 250W — a 77.8% difference. The Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (Radeon R9 270 / R7 370) vs 350W (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs None.
| Feature | Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 110W-56% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 450W | 350W-22% |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | None |
| Length | 220mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 70 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 38.7+129% | 16.9 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 launched at $149 MSRP, while the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U launched at $450. The Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 costs 66.9% less ($301 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 28.6 (Radeon R9 270 / R7 370) vs 9.4 (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U) — the Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 offers 204.3% better value. The Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2015).
| Feature | Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $149-67% | $450 |
| Performance per Dollar | 28.6+204% | 9.4 |
| Codename | Trinidad | Navi 21 |
| Release | May 5 2015 | October 28 2020 |
| Ranking | #456 | #65 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












