
Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU
Popular choices:

Radeon R9 270 / R7 370
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU
2017Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: GCN 5.0 (2017−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 28.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
- ❌172.7% higher power demand at 300W vs 110W.
Radeon R9 270 / R7 370
2015Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 28.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Draws 110W instead of 300W, a 190W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU
2017Radeon R9 270 / R7 370
2015Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: GCN 5.0 (2017−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 28.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Draws 110W instead of 300W, a 190W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 28.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
- ❌172.7% higher power demand at 300W vs 110W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU better than Radeon R9 270 / R7 370?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU | Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 139 FPS | 77 FPS |
| medium | 129 FPS | 62 FPS |
| high | 106 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 81 FPS | 32 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 118 FPS | 65 FPS |
| medium | 102 FPS | 53 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 37 FPS |
| ultra | 64 FPS | 23 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 55 FPS | 23 FPS |
| medium | 48 FPS | 22 FPS |
| high | 38 FPS | 14 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 12 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU | Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 198 FPS | 111 FPS |
| medium | 159 FPS | 82 FPS |
| high | 132 FPS | 63 FPS |
| ultra | 99 FPS | 38 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 137 FPS | 63 FPS |
| medium | 111 FPS | 42 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 31 FPS |
| ultra | 70 FPS | 20 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 60 FPS | 23 FPS |
| medium | 50 FPS | 15 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 12 FPS |
| ultra | 40 FPS | 8 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU | Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 198 FPS | 192 FPS |
| medium | 159 FPS | 153 FPS |
| high | 132 FPS | 128 FPS |
| ultra | 99 FPS | 96 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 149 FPS | 144 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 115 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 74 FPS | 72 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 99 FPS | 96 FPS |
| medium | 79 FPS | 77 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 64 FPS |
| ultra | 50 FPS | 48 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU | Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 198 FPS | 135 FPS |
| medium | 159 FPS | 108 FPS |
| high | 132 FPS | 94 FPS |
| ultra | 99 FPS | 77 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 149 FPS | 99 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 81 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 71 FPS |
| ultra | 74 FPS | 54 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 99 FPS | 58 FPS |
| medium | 79 FPS | 44 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 35 FPS |
| ultra | 50 FPS | 25 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU and Radeon R9 270 / R7 370

Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU
Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU
The Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 27 2017. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1400 MHz to 1500 MHz. It has 4096 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,403 points.

Radeon R9 270 / R7 370
Radeon R9 270 / R7 370
The Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 925 MHz to 975 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,260 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU scores 4,403 and the Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 reaches 4,260 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU is built on GCN 5.0 while the Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 uses GCN 1.0, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 4,096 (Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU) vs 1,280 (Radeon R9 270 / R7 370). Raw compute: 12.29 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU) vs 2.496 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 270 / R7 370). Boost clocks: 1500 MHz vs 975 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU | Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,403+3% | 4,260 |
| Architecture | GCN 5.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 4096 ×2+220% | 1280 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 12.29 TFLOPS ×2+392% | 2.496 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1500 MHz+54% | 975 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 ×2+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 256 ×2+220% | 80 |
| L1 Cache | 1 MB+163% | 0.38 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+700% | 0.5 MB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU | Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon R9 270 / R7 370) — the Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU | Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 256-bit+300% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+700% | 0.5 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU draws 300W versus the Radeon R9 270 / R7 370's 110W — a 92.7% difference. The Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU) vs 450W (Radeon R9 270 / R7 370). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU | Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 300W | 110W-63% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-22% | 450W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | — | 220mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 70 |
| Perf/Watt | 14.7 | 38.7+163% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2015).
| Feature | Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU | Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $149 |
| Codename | Vega 10 | Trinidad |
| Release | June 27 2017 | May 5 2015 |
| Ranking | #474 | #456 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












