Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU vs Tesla K20m

AMD

Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU

2017Core: 1400 MHzBoost: 1500 MHz

Popular choices:

VS
NVIDIA

Tesla K20m

2013Core: 706 MHz

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU

2017

Why buy it

  • More future proof: GCN 5.0 (2017−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 1.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $3,199 MSRP).
  • 33.3% higher power demand at 300W vs 225W.

Tesla K20m

2013

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($3,199 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • Draws 225W instead of 300W, a 75W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.

Quick Answers

So, is Tesla K20m better than Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU?
Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 4,403 vs 4,432 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer Tesla K20m is the overall package: you are getting no meaningful modern upscaling stack, plus much lower power draw (225W vs 300W).
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2017 generation instead of 2013, better upscaling support with FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, and a 14nm process instead of 28nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Tesla K20m can still make sense if you find it at the right price, especially around $3,199 MSRP. Tesla K20m is still the smarter buy for most people, though, because the raw performance is close while the overall package is cleaner. Tesla K20m is priced in an unclear MSRP range at $3,199 MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 0.7% higher G3D Mark. Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU is the newer 2017 card, so it still has a real case if you care more about newer architecture and future-proofing than about squeezing out the strongest gaming value today.
When does Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU make more sense than Tesla K20m?
Yes. Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, future-proofing, and staying closer to an unclear MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of Tesla K20m. The trade-off is that Tesla K20m currently gives you 0.7% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 100+%.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetRadeon Instinct MI25 MxGPUTesla K20m
1080p
low139 FPS102 FPS
medium129 FPS83 FPS
high106 FPS66 FPS
ultra81 FPS39 FPS
1440p
low118 FPS85 FPS
medium102 FPS71 FPS
high82 FPS50 FPS
ultra64 FPS29 FPS
4K
low55 FPS28 FPS
medium48 FPS26 FPS
high38 FPS17 FPS
ultra34 FPS15 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetRadeon Instinct MI25 MxGPUTesla K20m
1080p
low198 FPS88 FPS
medium159 FPS62 FPS
high132 FPS48 FPS
ultra99 FPS32 FPS
1440p
low137 FPS49 FPS
medium111 FPS32 FPS
high92 FPS24 FPS
ultra70 FPS17 FPS
4K
low60 FPS18 FPS
medium50 FPS12 FPS
high48 FPS9 FPS
ultra40 FPS7 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetRadeon Instinct MI25 MxGPUTesla K20m
1080p
low198 FPS199 FPS
medium159 FPS160 FPS
high132 FPS133 FPS
ultra99 FPS100 FPS
1440p
low149 FPS150 FPS
medium119 FPS120 FPS
high99 FPS100 FPS
ultra74 FPS75 FPS
4K
low99 FPS100 FPS
medium79 FPS80 FPS
high66 FPS66 FPS
ultra50 FPS50 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetRadeon Instinct MI25 MxGPUTesla K20m
1080p
low198 FPS182 FPS
medium159 FPS146 FPS
high132 FPS124 FPS
ultra99 FPS94 FPS
1440p
low149 FPS127 FPS
medium119 FPS104 FPS
high99 FPS89 FPS
ultra74 FPS66 FPS
4K
low99 FPS74 FPS
medium79 FPS57 FPS
high66 FPS46 FPS
ultra50 FPS31 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU and Tesla K20m

AMD

Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU

The Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 27 2017. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1400 MHz to 1500 MHz. It has 4096 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,403 points.

NVIDIA

Tesla K20m

The Tesla K20m is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 5 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 706 MHz. It has 2496 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,432 points. Launch price was $3,199.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU scores 4,403 and the Tesla K20m reaches 4,432 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU is built on GCN 5.0 while the Tesla K20m uses Kepler, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 4,096 (Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU) vs 2,496 (Tesla K20m). Raw compute: 12.29 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU) vs 3.524 TFLOPS (Tesla K20m).

FeatureRadeon Instinct MI25 MxGPUTesla K20m
G3D Mark Score
4,403
4,432
Architecture
GCN 5.0
Kepler
Process Node
14 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
4096 ×2+64%
2496
Compute (TFLOPS)
12.29 TFLOPS ×2+249%
3.524 TFLOPS
ROPs
64 ×2+60%
40
TMUs
256 ×2+23%
208
L1 Cache
1 MB+400%
0.2 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB+220%
1.25 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon Instinct MI25 MxGPUTesla K20m
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU) vs 1.25 MB (Tesla K20m) — the Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon Instinct MI25 MxGPUTesla K20m
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
4 MB+220%
1.25 MB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU draws 300W versus the Tesla K20m's 225W — a 28.6% difference. The Tesla K20m is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU) vs 350W (Tesla K20m). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureRadeon Instinct MI25 MxGPUTesla K20m
TDP
300W
225W-25%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Perf/Watt
14.7
19.7+34%
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2013).

FeatureRadeon Instinct MI25 MxGPUTesla K20m
MSRP
$3199
Codename
Vega 10
GK110
Release
June 27 2017
January 5 2013
Ranking
#474
#470