
Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU
Popular choices:

Tesla K20m
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU
2017Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: GCN 5.0 (2017−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 1.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $3,199 MSRP).
- ❌33.3% higher power demand at 300W vs 225W.
Tesla K20m
2013Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($3,199 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Draws 225W instead of 300W, a 75W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU
2017Tesla K20m
2013Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: GCN 5.0 (2017−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($3,199 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Draws 225W instead of 300W, a 75W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 1.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $3,199 MSRP).
- ❌33.3% higher power demand at 300W vs 225W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Quick Answers
So, is Tesla K20m better than Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU make more sense than Tesla K20m?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU | Tesla K20m |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 139 FPS | 102 FPS |
| medium | 129 FPS | 83 FPS |
| high | 106 FPS | 66 FPS |
| ultra | 81 FPS | 39 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 118 FPS | 85 FPS |
| medium | 102 FPS | 71 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 50 FPS |
| ultra | 64 FPS | 29 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 55 FPS | 28 FPS |
| medium | 48 FPS | 26 FPS |
| high | 38 FPS | 17 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 15 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU | Tesla K20m |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 198 FPS | 88 FPS |
| medium | 159 FPS | 62 FPS |
| high | 132 FPS | 48 FPS |
| ultra | 99 FPS | 32 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 137 FPS | 49 FPS |
| medium | 111 FPS | 32 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 24 FPS |
| ultra | 70 FPS | 17 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 60 FPS | 18 FPS |
| medium | 50 FPS | 12 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 9 FPS |
| ultra | 40 FPS | 7 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU | Tesla K20m |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 198 FPS | 199 FPS |
| medium | 159 FPS | 160 FPS |
| high | 132 FPS | 133 FPS |
| ultra | 99 FPS | 100 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 149 FPS | 150 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 120 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 100 FPS |
| ultra | 74 FPS | 75 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 99 FPS | 100 FPS |
| medium | 79 FPS | 80 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 66 FPS |
| ultra | 50 FPS | 50 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU | Tesla K20m |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 198 FPS | 182 FPS |
| medium | 159 FPS | 146 FPS |
| high | 132 FPS | 124 FPS |
| ultra | 99 FPS | 94 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 149 FPS | 127 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 104 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 89 FPS |
| ultra | 74 FPS | 66 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 99 FPS | 74 FPS |
| medium | 79 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 50 FPS | 31 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU and Tesla K20m

Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU
Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU
The Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 27 2017. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1400 MHz to 1500 MHz. It has 4096 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,403 points.

Tesla K20m
Tesla K20m
The Tesla K20m is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 5 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 706 MHz. It has 2496 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,432 points. Launch price was $3,199.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU scores 4,403 and the Tesla K20m reaches 4,432 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU is built on GCN 5.0 while the Tesla K20m uses Kepler, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 4,096 (Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU) vs 2,496 (Tesla K20m). Raw compute: 12.29 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU) vs 3.524 TFLOPS (Tesla K20m).
| Feature | Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU | Tesla K20m |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,403 | 4,432 |
| Architecture | GCN 5.0 | Kepler |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 4096 ×2+64% | 2496 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 12.29 TFLOPS ×2+249% | 3.524 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 64 ×2+60% | 40 |
| TMUs | 256 ×2+23% | 208 |
| L1 Cache | 1 MB+400% | 0.2 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+220% | 1.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU | Tesla K20m |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU) vs 1.25 MB (Tesla K20m) — the Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU | Tesla K20m |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+220% | 1.25 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU draws 300W versus the Tesla K20m's 225W — a 28.6% difference. The Tesla K20m is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU) vs 350W (Tesla K20m). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU | Tesla K20m |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 300W | 225W-25% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Perf/Watt | 14.7 | 19.7+34% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2013).
| Feature | Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU | Tesla K20m |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $3199 |
| Codename | Vega 10 | GK110 |
| Release | June 27 2017 | January 5 2013 |
| Ranking | #474 | #470 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












