Radeon R9 270 vs Radeon R9 270 / R7 370

AMD

Radeon R9 270

2013Boost: 925 MHz

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Radeon R9 270 / R7 370

2015Core: 925 MHzBoost: 975 MHz

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Radeon R9 270

2013

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
  • 20.1% HIGHER MSRP
    $179 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 24.1 vs 28.6 G3D/$ ($179 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
  • 36.4% higher power demand at 150W vs 110W.

Radeon R9 270 / R7 370

2015

Why buy it

  • Costs $30 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $179 MSRP).
  • Delivers 18.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 28.6 vs 24.1 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $179 MSRP).
  • Draws 110W instead of 150W, a 40W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.

Quick Answers

So, is Radeon R9 270 better than Radeon R9 270 / R7 370?
Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 4,306 vs 4,260 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer Radeon R9 270 is the overall package: you are getting FSR upscaling.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon R9 270 is the safer long-term GPU choice because it gives you the stronger overall hardware and feature outlook for modern games.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Radeon R9 270 is the smarter buy by a wide margin. Radeon R9 270 is about 20.1% more expensive on MSRP at $179 MSRP versus $149 MSRP, and you are getting 1.1% higher G3D Mark. Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.
When does Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 make more sense than Radeon R9 270?
Yes. Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (110W vs 150W), and staying closer to $149 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of Radeon R9 270. The trade-off is that Radeon R9 270 currently gives you 1.1% higher G3D Mark. Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetRadeon R9 270Radeon R9 270 / R7 370
1080p
low77 FPS77 FPS
medium62 FPS62 FPS
high49 FPS49 FPS
ultra32 FPS32 FPS
1440p
low65 FPS65 FPS
medium53 FPS53 FPS
high37 FPS37 FPS
ultra23 FPS23 FPS
4K
low23 FPS23 FPS
medium22 FPS22 FPS
high14 FPS14 FPS
ultra12 FPS12 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetRadeon R9 270Radeon R9 270 / R7 370
1080p
low116 FPS111 FPS
medium86 FPS82 FPS
high66 FPS63 FPS
ultra41 FPS38 FPS
1440p
low65 FPS63 FPS
medium44 FPS42 FPS
high32 FPS31 FPS
ultra21 FPS20 FPS
4K
low23 FPS23 FPS
medium16 FPS15 FPS
high13 FPS12 FPS
ultra9 FPS8 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetRadeon R9 270Radeon R9 270 / R7 370
1080p
low194 FPS192 FPS
medium155 FPS153 FPS
high129 FPS128 FPS
ultra97 FPS96 FPS
1440p
low145 FPS144 FPS
medium116 FPS115 FPS
high97 FPS96 FPS
ultra73 FPS72 FPS
4K
low97 FPS96 FPS
medium78 FPS77 FPS
high65 FPS64 FPS
ultra48 FPS48 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetRadeon R9 270Radeon R9 270 / R7 370
1080p
low136 FPS135 FPS
medium111 FPS108 FPS
high96 FPS94 FPS
ultra82 FPS77 FPS
1440p
low100 FPS99 FPS
medium82 FPS81 FPS
high71 FPS71 FPS
ultra56 FPS54 FPS
4K
low59 FPS58 FPS
medium46 FPS44 FPS
high36 FPS35 FPS
ultra26 FPS25 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R9 270 and Radeon R9 270 / R7 370

AMD

Radeon R9 270

The Radeon R9 270 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 13 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 925 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,306 points. Launch price was $179.

AMD

Radeon R9 270 / R7 370

The Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 925 MHz to 975 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,260 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon R9 270 scores 4,306 and the Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 reaches 4,260 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 270 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,280 (Radeon R9 270) vs 1,280 (Radeon R9 270 / R7 370). Raw compute: 2.368 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 270) vs 2.496 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 270 / R7 370). Boost clocks: 925 MHz vs 975 MHz.

FeatureRadeon R9 270Radeon R9 270 / R7 370
G3D Mark Score
4,306+1%
4,260
Architecture
GCN 1.0
GCN 1.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
1280
1280
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.368 TFLOPS
2.496 TFLOPS+5%
Boost Clock
925 MHz
975 MHz+5%
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
80
80
L1 Cache
320 KB
384 KB+20%
L2 Cache
512 KB
512 KB
Frame Generation
FSR upscaling
FSR upscaling

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon R9 270Radeon R9 270 / R7 370
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit.

FeatureRadeon R9 270Radeon R9 270 / R7 370
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
179.2 GB/s
179.2 GB/s
Bus Width
256-bit
256-bit
L2 Cache
512 KB
512 KB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R9 270 draws 150W versus the Radeon R9 270 / R7 370's 110W — a 30.8% difference. The Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon R9 270) vs 450W (Radeon R9 270 / R7 370). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs 1x 6-pin.

FeatureRadeon R9 270Radeon R9 270 / R7 370
TDP
150W
110W-27%
Recommended PSU
500W
450W-10%
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
1x 6-pin
Length
220mm
Height
111mm
Slots
2
Temp (Load)
70
Perf/Watt
28.7
38.7+35%
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon R9 270 launched at $179 MSRP, while the Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 launched at $149. The Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 costs 16.8% less ($30 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 24.1 (Radeon R9 270) vs 28.6 (Radeon R9 270 / R7 370) — the Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 offers 18.7% better value. The Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2013).

FeatureRadeon R9 270Radeon R9 270 / R7 370
MSRP
$179
$149-17%
Performance per Dollar
24.1
28.6+19%
Codename
Curacao
Trinidad
Release
November 13 2013
May 5 2015
Ranking
#476
#456