
Radeon R9 270
Popular choices:

Radeon R9 270 / R7 370
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon R9 270
2013Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌20.1% HIGHER MSRP$179 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 24.1 vs 28.6 G3D/$ ($179 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
- ❌36.4% higher power demand at 150W vs 110W.
Radeon R9 270 / R7 370
2015Why buy it
- ✅Costs $30 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $179 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 18.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 28.6 vs 24.1 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $179 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 110W instead of 150W, a 40W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Radeon R9 270
2013Radeon R9 270 / R7 370
2015Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $30 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $179 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 18.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 28.6 vs 24.1 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $179 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 110W instead of 150W, a 40W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌20.1% HIGHER MSRP$179 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 24.1 vs 28.6 G3D/$ ($179 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
- ❌36.4% higher power demand at 150W vs 110W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon R9 270 better than Radeon R9 270 / R7 370?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 make more sense than Radeon R9 270?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon R9 270 | Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 77 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 62 FPS |
| high | 49 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 32 FPS | 32 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 65 FPS | 65 FPS |
| medium | 53 FPS | 53 FPS |
| high | 37 FPS | 37 FPS |
| ultra | 23 FPS | 23 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 23 FPS | 23 FPS |
| medium | 22 FPS | 22 FPS |
| high | 14 FPS | 14 FPS |
| ultra | 12 FPS | 12 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon R9 270 | Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 116 FPS | 111 FPS |
| medium | 86 FPS | 82 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 63 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 38 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 65 FPS | 63 FPS |
| medium | 44 FPS | 42 FPS |
| high | 32 FPS | 31 FPS |
| ultra | 21 FPS | 20 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 23 FPS | 23 FPS |
| medium | 16 FPS | 15 FPS |
| high | 13 FPS | 12 FPS |
| ultra | 9 FPS | 8 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon R9 270 | Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 194 FPS | 192 FPS |
| medium | 155 FPS | 153 FPS |
| high | 129 FPS | 128 FPS |
| ultra | 97 FPS | 96 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 145 FPS | 144 FPS |
| medium | 116 FPS | 115 FPS |
| high | 97 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 73 FPS | 72 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 97 FPS | 96 FPS |
| medium | 78 FPS | 77 FPS |
| high | 65 FPS | 64 FPS |
| ultra | 48 FPS | 48 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon R9 270 | Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 136 FPS | 135 FPS |
| medium | 111 FPS | 108 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 94 FPS |
| ultra | 82 FPS | 77 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 100 FPS | 99 FPS |
| medium | 82 FPS | 81 FPS |
| high | 71 FPS | 71 FPS |
| ultra | 56 FPS | 54 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 59 FPS | 58 FPS |
| medium | 46 FPS | 44 FPS |
| high | 36 FPS | 35 FPS |
| ultra | 26 FPS | 25 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R9 270 and Radeon R9 270 / R7 370

Radeon R9 270
Radeon R9 270
The Radeon R9 270 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 13 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 925 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,306 points. Launch price was $179.

Radeon R9 270 / R7 370
Radeon R9 270 / R7 370
The Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 925 MHz to 975 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,260 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R9 270 scores 4,306 and the Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 reaches 4,260 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 270 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,280 (Radeon R9 270) vs 1,280 (Radeon R9 270 / R7 370). Raw compute: 2.368 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 270) vs 2.496 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 270 / R7 370). Boost clocks: 925 MHz vs 975 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon R9 270 | Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,306+1% | 4,260 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1280 | 1280 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.368 TFLOPS | 2.496 TFLOPS+5% |
| Boost Clock | 925 MHz | 975 MHz+5% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 80 | 80 |
| L1 Cache | 320 KB | 384 KB+20% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R9 270 | Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | Radeon R9 270 | Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 179.2 GB/s | 179.2 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R9 270 draws 150W versus the Radeon R9 270 / R7 370's 110W — a 30.8% difference. The Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon R9 270) vs 450W (Radeon R9 270 / R7 370). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | Radeon R9 270 | Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 110W-27% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 450W-10% |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | — | 220mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 70 |
| Perf/Watt | 28.7 | 38.7+35% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R9 270 launched at $179 MSRP, while the Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 launched at $149. The Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 costs 16.8% less ($30 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 24.1 (Radeon R9 270) vs 28.6 (Radeon R9 270 / R7 370) — the Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 offers 18.7% better value. The Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2013).
| Feature | Radeon R9 270 | Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $179 | $149-17% |
| Performance per Dollar | 24.1 | 28.6+19% |
| Codename | Curacao | Trinidad |
| Release | November 13 2013 | May 5 2015 |
| Ranking | #476 | #456 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












