FirePro W8000 vs Radeon R9 270

FirePro W8000

Popular choices:

RTX 4060β€’RTX 3060β€’RTX 4060 Tiβ€’RTX 3070β€’GTX 1650β€’RTX 3060 Tiβ€’RTX 4070β€’RTX 3050
VS
AMD

Radeon R9 270

Popular choices:

RTX 4060β€’RTX 3060β€’RTX 4060 Tiβ€’RTX 3070β€’GTX 1650β€’RTX 3060 Tiβ€’RTX 4070β€’RTX 3050

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark Score

4259

G3D Mark Score

4306

Performance Difference

Radeon R9 270 is 1.1% faster than FirePro W8000

VRAM & Game Performance

VRAM (Video RAM) is dedicated memory on your graphics card that stores textures, frame buffers, and game assets. Higher VRAM allows for sharper textures at high resolutions (1440p/4K) and prevents stuttering in modern AAA games. 8GB is minimum for 1080p, 12GB+ recommended for 1440p, and 16GB+ for 4K gaming.

FirePro W80004096 MB
016GB32GB
1080pLow
13%
low60%
medium20%
high4%
ultra4%
1440pLimited
7%
low30%
medium4%
high4%
ultra4%
4KLimited
4%
low4%
medium4%
high4%
ultra4%

πŸ“Š Performance Analysis

4 GB VRAM Β· 4,259 G3D Mark (entry-level)

1080pLow settings needed for 60 FPS.
1440pNot recommended. Use 1080p.
4KNot viable. Use lower resolution or heavy upscaling.

⚑Ray Tracing: RT not recommended. Keep disabled for playable FPS.

πŸš€Upscaling: Performance mode: +50-70% FPS, noticeable quality loss.

Radeon R9 270N/A
016GB32GB
VRAM data unavailable

Benchmarks & Performance Comparison

In this GPU comparison, Radeon R9 270 performs 1.1% better in benchmarks. Below you'll find detailed performance analysis, gaming benchmarks, power consumption data, and specifications to help you decide between FirePro W8000 and Radeon R9 270.

Both graphics cards are popular choices for gaming. When comparing GPUs, consider VRAM capacity, ray tracing performance, power requirements, and price-to-performance ratio for your target gaming resolution (1080p, 1440p, or 4K).

Technical Specifications

Detailed hardware specifications for FirePro W8000 and Radeon R9 270

FirePro W8000

The FirePro W8000 is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in June 14 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. Core clock: 900 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,259 points. Launch price was $1,599.

Technical Specifications

ROPs:32
TMUs:112
Vram:4096 MB
L1 Cache:448 kB
L2 Cache:512 kB
Core Clock:900 MHz
Shading Units:1792
Transistor Count:4,313 million
Texture Fill Rate:100.8
Manufacturing Process:28 nm
Power Consumption (TDP):225 Watt
Floating Point Performance:3.226 TFLOPS

General Information

Codename:Tahiti
Architecture:GCN 1.0 (2012βˆ’2020)
Launch Price:$1,599
Release Date:June 14 2012
Performance Ranking Position:481
AMD

Radeon R9 270

The Radeon R9 270 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 13 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. Boost clock: 925 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,306 points. Launch price was $179.

Technical Specifications

ROPs:32
TMUs:80
Vram:null
L1 Cache:320 kB
L2 Cache:512 kB
Boost Clock:925 MHz
Shading Units:1280
Transistor Count:2,800 million
Texture Fill Rate:74.00
Manufacturing Process:28 nm
Power Consumption (TDP):150 Watt
Floating Point Performance:2.368 TFLOPS

General Information

Design:reference
Codename:Curacao
Architecture:GCN 1.0 (2012βˆ’2020)
Launch Price:$179
Release Date:November 13 2013
Performance Ranking Position:476

Top Performing GPUs

The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores

You May Also Compare

Similar GPU comparisons based on FirePro W8000 and Radeon R9 270